Codependency is a term used to describe a range of behaviors among persons who are affected by the problematic drug use of family members. This article analyzes how 32 Swedish parents of adult children with drug problems talked about and understood codependency. The sociology of trouble was used as a theoretical framework and three significant themes were identified in the interviews. The parents spoke about how they defined codependency troubles, how they discovered codependency, and how they set boundaries for their children. The parents talked about their situations as highly distressing, and third-party troubleshooters defined their troubles and problems as codependency. The parents generally rejected the advice to “close the door” on their children and engaged in a range of remedial actions. The analytical focus of this study on the identification, definition, and remedial actions of parents gives valuable insights into family disruptions related to drug problems.
BaconI. G. F. I. (2014). An exploration of the experience of codependency through interpretative phenomenological analysis (PhD thesis). London: Brunel University.
2.
BeattieM. (1989). Beyond codependency: And getting better all the time. Center City, PA: Hazelden Publishing.
3.
BeattieM. (1992). Codependent no more. How to top controlling others and start caring for yourself. Center City, PA: Hazelden Publishing.
4.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
5.
CorriganP. W.WatsonA.C.MillerF. E. (2006). Blame, shame, and contamination: The impact of mental illness and drug dependence stigma on family members. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 239–246.
6.
DevaneyE. (2017). The emergence of the affected adult family member in drug policy discourse: A Foucauldian perspective. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 24(4), 359–367).
7.
EmersonR. M. (2009). Ethnography, interaction and ordinary trouble. Ethnography, 10(4), 535–548.
8.
EmersonR. M. (2011). From normal conflict to normative deviance: The micro-politics of trouble in close relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(1), 3–38.
9.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
EmersonR. M.MessingerS. L. (1977). The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problems, 23(2), 121–134.
11.
FrancisA. A. (2012). The dynamics of family trouble: Middle-class parents whose children have problems. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(4), 371–401.
12.
GeminJ. (1997). Manufacturing codependency: Self-help as discursive formation. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 14(3), 249–266.
13.
GerdnerA. (1999). “Problem kring begreppet ‘medberoende [Problems with the concept ‘codependency’].” Socionomen, 4, 53–63.
14.
GiddensA. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
HazledenB. (2014). Whose fault is it? Exoneration and allocation of personal responsibility in relationship manuals. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 422–436.
16.
IrvineL. J. (1995). Codependency and recovery: Gender, self, and emotions in popular self-help. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 145–163.
17.
JacksonD.MannixJ. (2003). Then suddenly he went right off the rails: Mothers’ stories of adolescent cannabis use. Contemporary Nurse, 14, 169–179.
18.
JacksonI. C. (2018). What impact does an adult substance user have on mothers, and how do they make sense of their experience?Universal Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 19–28.
19.
LloydC. (2013). The stigmatization of problem drug users: A narrative literature review. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 20(2), 85–95.
20.
McGrathM.OakleyB. (2012). Codependency and pathological altruism. In OakleyB.KnafoA.MadhavanG.WilsonD.S. (Eds.), Pathological altruism (pp. 49–75), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
OrfordJ.CopelloA. (2002). Addiction and the family: Is it time for services to take notice of the evidence?Addiction, 97, 1361–1363.
22.
OrfordJ.CopelloA.VallemanR.TempletonL. (2010a). Family members affected by a close relative’s addiction: The stress-strain-coping-support model. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(1), 36–43.
23.
OrfordJ.VallemanR.CopelloA.TempletonL.IbangaA. (2010b). The experiences of affected family members: A summary of two decades of qualitative research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(1), 44–62.
24.
PalmbladE. (2013). Medberoende–en introduktion [Codependency–An introduction]. In PalmbladE.BörjessonM.LindforsM.SahlinI. (Eds.), Medberoende och moral. Framväxten av en problemkategori [Codependency and morality. The emergence of a problem category], (pp. 9–33). Stockholm: Carlsson bokförlag.
25.
RichertT.JohnsonB.SvenssonB. (2017). Being a parent to an adult child with drug problems: Negative impacts on life situation, health, and emotions. Journal of Family Issues, 39(8), 2311–2335.
26.
RotundaR. J.DomanK. (2001). Partner enabling of substance use disorders: Critical review and future directions. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(4), 257–270.
27.
SingerM.PageJ. B. (2014). The social value of drug addicts: uses of the useless. Walnut Creek, CA, Left Coast Press.
28.
SöderbladA.LundellS. (2015). Djävulsdansen: Bli fri från ditt medberoende [The Devil’s dance: Free yourself from your codependency], Stockholm: Bladh by Bladh.
29.
SturgesJ. E.HanrahanK. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107–118.
30.
ThomasE. J.YoshiokaM.AgerR. D. (1996). Spouse enabling of alcohol abuse: Conception, assessment, and modification. Journal of Substance Abuse, 8(1), 61–80.
