When people experience trouble in their relations with others, they may come to define the problem in nonjudgmental ways as a conflict to be resolved or in moralistic terms as a product of the other’s deviant intentions or character. Empirical materials on troubles among college roommates reveal an initial preference for the former, with the latter typically emerging if and when initial response efforts fail and the trouble escalates. These findings force a revision of analyses that take up consideration of the conflict/deviance alternative only with the entrance of a third party into dyadic troubles.
Aubert, Vilhelm.1965. Competition and dissensus: Two types of conflict and conflict resolution. In The hidden society, ed. V. Aubert, 83-115. Totowa, NJ: Bedminister .
2.
Black, Donald.1980. The manners and customs of the police. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Black, Donald.1998. The social structure of right and wrong. Rev. ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
Cavan, Sherri.1966. Liquor license: An ethnography of bar behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
5.
Charmaz, Kathy.2001. Grounded theory. In Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations. 2nd ed., ed. R. M. Emerson.Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
6.
Coser, Lewis.1956. The functions of social conflict. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
Davis, Phillip W.1983. Restoring the semblance of order: Police strategies in the domestic disturbance. Symbolic Interaction6:261-78.
8.
Emerson, Robert M.1981. On last resorts. American Journal of Sociology87:1-22.
9.
Emerson, Robert M.2008. Responding to roommate troubles: Reconsidering informal dyadic control. Law & Society Review42:483-512.
10.
Emerson, Robert M.2009. Ethnography, interaction and ordinary trouble. Ethnography10:535-48.
11.
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw .1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes . Chicago: University of Chicago .
12.
Emerson, Robert M., and Sheldon L. Messinger .1977. The micro-politics of trouble . Social Problems25:121-34.
13.
Felstiner, William L. F.1975. Avoidance as dispute processing. Law & Society Review9:695-705.
14.
Goffman, Erving.1971. Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order . New York: Basic Books.
15.
Gubrium, Jaber F., and James A. Holstein .1997. The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University .
16.
Gulliver, Phillip H.1979. Disputes and negotiations: A cross-cultural perspective . San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
17.
Hart, H.L.A.1965. The ascription of responsibility and rights. In Logic and language, ed. A. Flew, 151-74. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
18.
Holstein, James A., and Gale E. Miller .1990. Rethinking victimization: An interactional approach to victimology. Symbolic Interaction13:103-22.
19.
Katz, Jack.1975. Essences as moral identities: On verifiability and responsibility in imputations of deviance and charisma. American Journal of Sociology80:1369-390.
20.
Katz, Jack.1988. Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books .
21.
Katz, Jack.1999. How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago.
22.
Kitsuse, John I.1964. Societal reaction to deviant behavior: Problems of theory and method. In The other side: Perspectives on deviance, ed. H. S. Becker, 87-102. New York: Free Press.
23.
Kleinman, S., B. Stenross, and M. McMahon.1994. Privileging fieldwork over interviewing: Consequences for identity and practice. Symbolic Interaction17:37-50.
24.
Luckenbill, David F.1977. Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems25:176-86.
25.
Lynch, Michael.1983. Accommodation practices: Vernacular treatments of madness . Social Problems31:152-63.
26.
Macaulay, S.1963. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study . American Sociological Review28:55-69.
27.
Matza, David.1969. Becoming deviant. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
McHugh, Peter.1970. A common-sense conception of deviance. In Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings, ed. J. D. Douglas, 61-88. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Merry, Sally E.1990. Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago.
30.
Mills, C. Wright.1940. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review5:904-13.
31.
Morrill, Calvin.1995. The executive way: Conflict management in corporations . Chicago: University of Chicago .
32.
Nader, Laura.1969. Styles of court procedure: To make the balance. In Law in culture and society, ed. L. Nader, 69-91. Chicago: Aldine.
33.
Sacks, Harvey.1992. Lectures on conversation Volume II. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
34.
Sillars, Alan L.1980a. Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts . Communication Monographs47:180-200.
35.
Sillars, Alan L.1980b. The sequential and distributional structure of conflict interactions as a function of attributions concerning the locus of responsibility and stability of conflicts. In Communication yearbook IV, ed. D. Nimmo, 217-35. Edison, NJ: Transaction Books.
36.
Sillars, Alan L.1981. Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution. In New directions in attribution research, Vol. 3, ed. J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, and R. F. Kidd, 279-305. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Simmel, Georg.1955. Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York: Free Press.
38.
Smith, Dorothy E.1978. "’K is mentally ill": The anatomy of a factual account . Sociology12:23-47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
