This article explores narratives of parenting a child with impairments for insight into impairment as both a materially and socially meaningful phenomenon. Drawing from in-depth interviews with parents, a narrative approach is employed to explore the ambiguities of human impairment and embodiment as experienced by an intimate other. Parents’stories illustrate impairment as an intersubjective and intercorporeal accomplishment and illustrate multiple locations of meaning of impairment within the context of intimate social relationships. Narrative approaches have largely been identified with research on embodiment from the perspective of disabled people; it is argued that narrative accounts of embodied others may avoid dualisms of objective/subjective and social/natural that trouble current theoretical approaches to impairment.
Asch, Adrienne. 1990. The meeting of disability and bioethics: A beginning rapproachement. In Ethical issues in disability and rehabilitation: An international perspective, edited by B. S. Duncan and D. Woods. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund, World Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation International.
2.
Asch, Adrienne. 2001. Disability, bioethics, and human rights. In Handbook of disability studies, edited by G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, and M. Bury, 297–326. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bjarnason, D. S.2002. New voices in Iceland. Parents and children: Supports and choices in time and space. Disability & Society17 (3): 307–326.
4.
Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bury, Michael. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness4:167–192.
6.
Charmaz, Kathy. 1991. Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
Chase, Susan E.1995. Taking narrative seriously: Consequences for method and theory in interview studies. In Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives, edited by R. Josselson and A. Lieblich, 1–26. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Crow, Liz. 1996. Including all our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In Exploring the divide: Illness and disability, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 55–73. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
9.
Dowling, Monica, and Linda Dolan. 2001. Families with children with disabilities—Inequalities and the social model. Disability & Society16 (1): 21–35.
10.
Ferguson, Philip M.2001. Mapping the family: Disability studies and the exploration of parental response to disability. In Handbook of disability studies, edited by G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, and M. Bury, 373–395. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Frank, Arthur. 1995. The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
French, Sally. 1993. Disability, impairment or something in between? In Disabling barriers—Enabling environments, edited by J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, and M. Oliver, 17–25. London: Sage.
13.
Fujimura, Joan. 1992. Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation.” In Science as practice and culture, edited by A. Pickering, 168–211. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
15.
Groce, Nora, and Irving K. Zola. 1993. Multiculturalism, chronic illness, and disability. Pediatrics91 (5): 1048–1055.
16.
Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 1995. Deprivatization and the construction of domestic life. Journal of Marriage and the Family57:894–908.
17.
Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Paterson. 1997. The social model of disability and the disappearingbody:Towardsasociologyofimpairment. Disability&Society12(3):325–340.
18.
Josselson, Ruthellen. 1995. Imagining the real: Empathy, narrative, and the dialogic self. In Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives, edited by R. Josselson and A. Lieblich, 27–44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2002. When caring is just and justice is caring: Justice and mental retardation. In The subject of care: Feminist perspectives on dependency, edited by E. F. Kittay and E. K Feder. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
20.
Landsman, Gail. 1999. Does God give special kids to special parents? Personhood and the child with disabilities as gift and giver. In Transformative motherhood: On giving and getting in a consumer culture, edited by Linda L. Layne. New York: New York University Press.
21.
Landsman, Gail. 2000. “Real motherhood,” class, and children with disabilities. In Ideologies and technologies of motherhood: Race, class, sexuality, nationalism, edited by R. Heléna and F. W. Twine, 169–187. London: Routledge.
22.
Landsman, Gail. 2003. Emplotting children’s lives: Developmental delay vs. disability. Social Science & Medicine56:1947–1960.
23.
Larson, Elizabeth. 1998. Reframing the meaning of disability to families: Embracing the paradox. Social Science & Medicine47 (7): 865–875.
24.
Layne, Linda. 2003. Motherhood lost: A feminist account of pregnancy loss in America. New York: Routledge.
25.
Leiter, Valerie R. 2001. Gentle intrusions: Family-centered care in early intervention (Doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International 62: 796-796.
26.
Leiter, Valerie R.2004. Dilemmas in sharing care: Maternal provision of professionally driven therapy for children with disabilities. Social Science and Medicine58:837–849.
27.
Lieblich, Amia, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach, and Tamar Zilber. 1998. Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
McLaughlin, A. M., and J. L. Carey. 1993. The adversarial alliance: Developing therapeutic relationships between families and the team in brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury7:45–51.
29.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.
30.
Oliver, Michael. 1993. Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies? In Disabling barriers—Enabling environments, edited by J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, and M. Oliver. London: Sage.
31.
Mutua, N. Kagendo. 2001. Policed identities: Children with disabilities. Educational Studies32 (3): 289–300.
32.
Seymour, Wendy. 1998. Remaking the body: Rehabilitation and change. London: Routledge.
33.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1990. Difference and danger: The cultural dynamics of childhood stigma, rejection, and rescue. The Cleft Palate Journal27 (3): 301–306.
34.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, and Margaret Lock. 1987. The mindful body: A prolegomena to future work in medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly1 (1): 6–41.
36.
Sparkes, Andrew C., and Brett Smith. 2002. Sport, spinal cord injury, embodied masculinities, and the dilemmas of narrative identity. Men and Masculinities4(3): 258–285.
37.
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Thomas, Carol. 1999. Narrative identity and the disabled self. In Disability and discourse, edited by M. Corker and S. French. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.
39.
Turner, Bryan. 1992. Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. London: Routledge.
40.
Turner, Bryan. 2001. Disability and sociology of the body. In Handbook of disability studies, edited by G.L. Albrecht, K.D.Seelman, and M.Bury, 252–265. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Young, Katherine. 1997. Presence in the flesh: The body in medicine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Weiss, Meira. 1997. Territorial isolation and physical deformity: Israeli parents’ reaction to disabled children. Disability & Society12 (2): 259–271.
43.
Williams, Gareth. 2001. Theorizing disability. In Handbook of disability studies, edited by G.L. Albrecht, K.D.Seelman, and M. Bury, 123–144. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
