The desire to collect objects that represent a distant age has long been a part of the human social anatomy. However, only in the last several decades have academics given attention to collecting behaviors that affect local and global heritage sites. Although this scholarly discourse has become increasingly sophisticated, writers still often cast all collecting within the framework of “looting.” Grounded in detailed ethnographic interviews and observations in the San Pedro Valley of Arizona, this study suggests other possible connections to the archaeological landscape. By incorporating a more humanistic approach and focusing on the everyday experiences of people who collect objects, scholars may more fully comprehend the complex intersections that link people to the ancient past through things.
Antevs, E.1959. Geological age of the Lehner mammoth site. American Antiquity25:31-34.
2.
Aunger, R.1995. On ethnography: Storytelling or science?Current Anthropology36:97-114.
3.
Badone, E.1987. Ethnicity, folklore, and local identity in rural Brittany. Journal of American Folklore100:161-190.
4.
Badone, E.1991. Ethnography, fiction, and the meanings of the past in Brittany. American Ethnologist18:518-545.
5.
Barker, A. W.2000. Ethics, e-commerce, and the future of the past. Society for American Archaeology Bulletin18:15.
6.
Bender, B., ed. 1993. Landscape: Politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
7.
Berlo, C., ed. 1992. The early years of Native American art history: The politics of scholarship and collecting. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
8.
Bernard, H. R.1994. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
9.
Bird, S. E.2002. It makes sense to us: Cultural identity in local legends and place. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography31:519-547.
10.
Blocker, G. H.1994. The aesthetics of primitive art. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
11.
Bourne, E.1967. Woman in Levi’s. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
12.
Breckenridge, C. A.1989. The aesthetics and politics of colonial collecting: India at world fairs. Comparative Studies in Society and History31:195-216.
13.
Bruhns, K. O.2000. www.plunderedpast.com. Society for American Archaeology Bulletin18:14-15, 17.
14.
Byrne, D.1999. The nation, the elite and the Southeast Asian antiquities trade: With special reference to Thailand. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites3:145-153.
15.
Chamberlin, R.1983. Loot! The heritage of plunder. New York: Facts on File.
16.
Chippindale, C.1986. Stoned henge: Events and issues at the summer solstice, 1985. World Archaeology18:38-58.
17.
Chippindale, C., and D. W. J. Gill. 2000. Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting. American Journal of Archaeology104:463-511.
18.
Clark, J. J.2003. A brief history of lower San Pedro archaeology. Archaeology Southwest17:2-3.
19.
Clewlow, C. W., Jr., P. S. Hallinan, and R. D. Ambro. 1971. A crisis in archaeology. American Antiquity36:472-473.
20.
Coggins, C.1969. Illicit traffic of pre-Columbian antiquities. Art Journal29:94-98, 114.
21.
Coggins, C.1998. United States cultural property legislation: Observations of a combatant. International Journal of Cultural Property7:52-68.
22.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C.2003. Signs in place: Native American perspectives of the past in the San Pedro Valley of Southeastern Arizona. Kiva69:5-29.
23.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., and J. Piper. 2001. War and cultural property: The 1954 Hague convention and the status of U.S. ratification. International Journal of Cultural Property10:217-245.
24.
Di Peso, C. C.1958a. The Reeve ruin of Southeastern Arizona: A study of a prehistoric western pueblo migration into the middle San Pedro valley. The Amerind Foundation No. 8. Dragoon, AZ: Amerind Foundation, Inc.
25.
Di Peso, C. C.1958b. Western pueblo intrusion into the San Pedro valley. Kiva23:12-16.
26.
Doelle, W. H.2003. Pushing the pace of preservation. SAA Archaeological Record3:6-10.
27.
Doelle, W. H., and J. J. Clark. 2003. Preservation archaeology in the San Pedro valley. Archaeology Southwest17:1.
28.
Errington, S.1998. The death of authentic primitive art and other tales of progress. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Fagan, B.1996. Black day at slack farm. In Archaeological Ethics, edited by K. D. Vitelli, 39-45. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
30.
Fechner, F. G.1998. The fundamental aims of cultural property law. International Journal of Cultural Property7:376-394.
31.
Feder, K. L.1999. Frauds, myths, and mysteries: Science and pseudoscience in archaeology. 3rd ed.Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
32.
Ferguson, T. J., C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, and R. Anyon. 2004. One valley, many histories: Tohono O’odham, Hopi, Zuni and Western Apache history in the San Pedro valley. Archaeology Southwest18:1-15.
33.
Finn, C.1997. ‘Leaving more than footprints’: Modern votive offerings at Chaco Canyon prehistoric site. Antiquity71:169-178.
34.
Franklin, H. H.1980. Excavations at Second Canyon ruin, San Pedro Valley, Arizona. Arizona State Museum Contribution to Highway Salvage Archaeology in Arizona No. 60. Tucson: Arizona State Museum.
35.
Fulton, R. W., and C. J. Bahre. 1967. Charleston, Arizona: A documentary history. Arizona and the West9:41-64.
36.
Gersenblith, P.1995. Identity and cultural property: The protection of cultural property in the United States. Boston University Law Review75:559-688.
37.
Gill, D. W. J., and C. Chippindale. 1993. Material and intellectual consequences for cycladic figurines. American Journal of Archaeology97:601-659.
38.
Goldwater, R.1986. Primitivism in modern art. New York: Random House.
39.
Gregonis, L. M.1996. Alice Carpenter’s corridor through time. Journal of the Southwest38:279-298.
40.
Griffin, G. G.1986. In defense of the collector. National Geographic169:462-465.
41.
Hamilakis, Y.1999. Stories from exile: Fragments from the cultural biography of the Parthenon (or ‘Elgin’) Marbles. World Archaeology31:303-320.
42.
Hanson, R. B.2001. The San Pedro River: A discovery guide. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
43.
Harrington, S. P. M.1996. The looting of Arkansas: How one state copes with the erosion of its cultural heritage. In Archaeological Ethics, edited by K. D. Vitelli, 90-105. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
44.
Haury, E. W.1956. The Lehner Mammoth site. Kiva21:23-24.
45.
Haury, E. W., E. B. Sayles, and W. W. Wasley. 1959. The Lehner Mammoth site, Southeastern Arizona. American Antiquity25:2-30.
46.
Health, D. B.1973. Economic aspects of commercial archaeology in Costa Rica. American Antiquity38:259-264.
47.
Hinsley, C. M.2000. Digging for identity: Reflections on the cultural background of collecting. In Repatriation reader: Who owns American Indian remains?, edited by D. A. Mihesuah, 37-58. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
48.
Hitchens, C., and G. Binns. 1998. The Elgin Marbles: Should they be returned to Greece?London: Verso.
49.
Hoffman, T. L.1997. The role of public participation: Arizona’s public archaeology program. In Presenting archaeology to the public, edited by J. H. Jameson, Jr., 73-83. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
50.
Hollowell-Zimmer, J.2003. Digging in the dirt—Ethics and “low-end looting”. In Ethical issues in archaeology, edited by L. J. Zimmerman, K. D. Vitelli, and J. Hollowell-Zimmer, 45-56. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
51.
Howell, C. L.1996. Daring to deal with Huaqueros. In Archaeological ethics, edited by K. D. Vitelli, 47-53. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
52.
Huckell, B. B.2003. San Pedro, river of the ancients. Archaeology Southwest17:4-5.
53.
King, T. F.1983. Professional responsibility in public archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology12:143-164.
54.
King, T. F.1991. Some dimensions of the pothunting problem. In Protecting the past, edited by G. S. Smith and J. E. Ehrenhard, 83-92. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
55.
Kingsolver, B.2000. San Pedro River: The patience of a saint. National Geographic197:80-97.
56.
Krech, S., III, and B. A. Hail, eds. 1999. Collecting Native America, 1870-1960. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
57.
Lance, J. F.1959. Faunal remains from the Lehner Mammoth site. American Antiquity25:35-42.
58.
Layton, R., ed. 1989. Conflict in the archaeology of living tradition. London: Routledge.
59.
Lippard, L. R.1997. The lure of the local: Senses of place in a multicentered world. New York: New Press.
60.
Lowenthal, D.1985. The past is a foreign country. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Mallouf, R. J.2000. An unraveling rope: The looting of America’s past. In Repatriation reader: Who owns American Indian remains?, edited by D. A. Mihesuah, 59-73. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
62.
Martin, P.1999. Popular collecting and the everyday self: The reinvention of the museum?London: Leicester University Press.
63.
Masse, W. B.1996. Alice Hubbard Carpenter. Journal of the Southwest38:259-278.
64.
Matsuda, D.1998. The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: Point, muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property7:87-97.
65.
Maury, S. P.1998. Surviving the rainforest: The realities of looting in the rural villages of El Peten, Guatemala. Manuscript on File, Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Crystal River.
66.
McGuire, R. H.1992. Archaeology and the first Americans. American Anthropologist94:816-836.
67.
McManamon, F. P.1991. The many publics for archaeology. American Antiquity56:121-130.
68.
Mehringer, P. J., Jr., and C. V. Haynes, Jr.1965. The pollen evidence for the environment of early man and extinct mammals at the Lehner Mammoth site, Southeastern Arizona. American Antiquity31:17-23.
69.
Merryman, J. H.1986. Two ways of thinking about cultural property. American Journal of International Law80:831-883.
70.
Meskell, L., ed. 1998. Archaeology under fire: Nationalism, politics, and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge.
71.
Messenger, P. M., ed. 1999. The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
72.
Meyer, K. E.1973. The plundered past. New York: Atheneum.
73.
Muensterberger, W.1994. Collecting: An unruly passion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74.
Nicholas, L. H.1994. The rape of Europa: The fate of Europe’s treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Vintage.
75.
Parezo, N. J.1985. Cushing as part of the team: The collecting activities of the Smithsonian Institution. American Ethnologist12:763-774.
76.
Pearce, S. M.1995. On collecting. London: Routledge.
77.
Pearce, S. M.1998. Collecting in contemporary society. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
78.
Phillips, R. B., and C. B. Steiner, eds. 1999. Unpacking culture: Art and commodity in colonial and postcolonial worlds. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
79.
Price, S.1989. Primitive art in civilized places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
Pringle, P. M.1939. Getting down to business, from a collector’s point of view. American Antiquity4:273-276.
81.
Renfrew, C.2000. Loot, legitimacy, and ownership. London: Gerald Duckworth.
82.
Riding In, J.2000. Repatriation: A Pawnee’s perspective. In Repatriation reader: Who owns American Indian remains?, edited by D. A. Mihesuah, 106-122. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
83.
Rodman, M. C.1992. Empowering place: Multilocality and multivocality. American Anthropologist94:640-656.
84.
Sackler, E. A.1998. The ethic(s) of collecting. International Journal of Cultural Property7:132-140.
85.
Sassoon, D.1999. Considering the perspective of the victim: The antiquities of Nepal. In The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?, edited by P. M. Messenger, 61-62. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
86.
Sayles, E. B.1983. The Cochise cultural sequence in southern Arizona. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona No. 42. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
87.
Schmidt, P. R., and R. J. McIntosh, eds. 1996. Plundering Africa’s past. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88.
Schweizer, T.1998. Epistemology: The nature and validation of anthropological knowledge. In Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, edited by H. R. Bernard, 39-87. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
89.
Shapreau, C. J.2000. Second circuit holds that false statements contained in customs forms warrant forfeiture of ancient gold phiale—Hotly contested foreign patrimony issue not reached by the court: United States v. An Antique Platter of Gold. International Journal of Cultural Property9:49-76.
90.
Sheldon, H.1995. The lure of loot: An example or two. In Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues, edited by K. W. Tubb, 176-180. London: Archetype.
91.
Shelley, S. D., and J. H. Altschul, eds. 1996a. Introduction. In On the border: Analysis of materials recovered from the 1964 and 1991-1992 excavations at the Garden Canyon site (AZ EE:11:13 ASM). Technical Series No. 61, 1-13. Tucson: Statistical Research.
92.
Shelley, S. D., and J. H. Altschul. 1996b. On the border: analysis of materials recovered from the 1964 and 1991-1992 excavations at the Garden Canyon site (AZ EE:11:13 ASM). Technical Series No. 61. Tucson: Statistical Research.
93.
Simpson, E., ed. 1997. The spoils of war: World War II and its aftermath. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
94.
Simpson, M. G.1996. Making representations: Museums in the post-colonial era. London: Routledge.
95.
Smallhouse, S.2001. The greatest insult to a conservationist. Retrieved January 2002 from http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/dec/20/edss122001.htm
96.
Smith, L. T.1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed.
97.
Stanley, D. P.1993. St. Lawrence Island’s subsistence diggers: A new perspective on human effects on archaeological sites. Journal of Field Archaeology20:347-355.
98.
Thomas, D. H.2000. Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York: Basic Books.
99.
Thompson, M.1979. Rubbish theory: The creation and destruction of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100.
Trigger, B. G.1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
101.
Tuan, Y. F.1980. The significance of the artifact. Geographical Review70:462-472.
102.
Tubb, K. W., ed. 1995. Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues. London: Archetype.
103.
Udvardy, M., L. L. Giles, and J. B. Mitsanze. 2003. The transatlantic trade in African ancestors: Mijikenda memorial statues (Vigango) and the ethics of collecting and curating non-Western cultural property. American Anthropologist105:566-580.
104.
Varady, R. G., D. Colnic, R. Merideth, and T. Sprouse. 1996. The US-Mexico Border Environment Cooperation Commission: Collected perspectives on the first two years. Journal of Borderland Studies11:1-21.
105.
Vitelli, K. D.1996. Introduction. In Archaeological ethics, edited by K. D. Vitelli, 17-28. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
106.
Vitelli, K. D.2000. E-commerce in antiquities. Society for American Archaeology Bulletin18:4-5.
107.
Weatherbie, A.2003. Mimbres memories: Reflections of a reformed collector. Newsletter of the New Mexico Archaeological Council3:19-22.
108.
White, S.1998. A collector’s odyssey. International Journal of Cultural Property7:170-176.
109.
Wilk, R. R.1999. Whose forest? Whose land? Whose ruins? Ethics and conservation. Science and Engineering Ethics5:367-374.
