This study examines the relationship between community art and community development. Using data gathered from community-art projects in two Denver neighborhoods, the study describes the community-art process as a ritualistic setting for social interaction and documents the construction of neighborhood community. The author identifies the emergence of the social bonds of solidarity and collective identity that occurred as a result of bringing neighborhood residents together, providing a shared goal, and setting a common mood for the purpose of designing a community symbol. Drawing from traditional models of community, the author concludes that it is possible to generate gemeinschaft in settings where gesellschaft prevails by using community art as a tool for transforming a social realm. The author uncovers the unique characteristics of the community-art ritual that contribute to its effectiveness at building community and also discusses several policy implications for using community art to address social issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P. A.
, and P. Adler. 1987. Membership roles in field research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Adler, P. A.
, and P. Adler. 1989. The gloried self.Social Psychology Quarterly52:299-310.
3.
Bhattacharyya, J.1995. Solidarity and agency: rethinking community development.Human Organization54 (1): 60-69.
4.
Bellah, R.
, R. Madsen, W. Sullivan, A. Sidler, and S. Tipton. 1991. Habits of the heart.Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Becker, H.
1982. Art worlds.Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Blumer, H.
1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Booth, K.
1995. Culture builds communities: A guide to partnership building and putting culture to work on social issues.Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Communities.
8.
Cable, S.
, and B. Degutis. 1991. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters9 (3): 383-399.
9.
Christenson, J. A.1979. Urbanism and community sentiment: Extending Wirth's model.Social Science Quarterly60(3):387-400.
10.
Christenson, J. A.1984. Gemeinschaft and gesellschaft: Testing the spatial and communal hypotheses.Social Forces46 (1): 160-168.
11.
Collins, R.
1988. Theoretical sociology.San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12.
Cooley, C.
1902. Human nature and social order.New York: Scribner's.
13.
Costello, L.
1995. Part of the solution: Creative alternatives for youth.Washington, DC: National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.
14.
Dewey, J.
1934. Art as experience.New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
15.
Durkheim, E.
[1893] 1964. The division of labor.New York: Free Press.
16.
Durkheim, E.
[1912] 1954. The elementary forms of religious life.New York: Free Press.
17.
Felshin, N.
1995. But is it art? The spirit of art as activism.Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
18.
Flood, W. 1982. Animation: Socio-cultural community development in Europe and the United States. Master's Thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
19.
Freire, P.
1973. Education for critical consciousness.New York: Seabury Press.
20.
Fromm, E.
1955. The sane society.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
Gallagher, J.1995. Community aesthetics.New Statesman and Society8:32-33.
22.
Gamson, W.
1992. The social psychology of collective action. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller.New Haven: Yale University Press.
23.
Glaser, B.
, and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
24.
Gottfredson, M.
, and T. Hirschi. 1990. A general theory of crime.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Grayber, H.
, S. Haywood, and N. Vosler. 1996. An empowerment model for building neighborhood community: Grace Hill Neighborhood Services.Journal of Progressive Human Services7 (2): 63-76.
26.
Greene, M.
1995. Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Hillery, G., Jr.1955. Definitions of community: Areas of agreement.Rural Sociology20:111-123.
28.
Hillery, G., Jr.
1968. Communal organizations: A study of local societies.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Hillery, G., Jr.
1982. A research odyssey: Developing and testing a community theory.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30.
Homans, G.
1950. The human group.New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
31.
James, W.
1890. Principles of psychology.New York: Holt.
32.
Johnston, H.
, E. Larana, and J. Gusfield. 1994. Identities, grievances and new social movements. In New social movements, edited by Enrique Larana, Hank Johnston, and Joseph R. Gusfield.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Jones, B.1988. The community artist as community development catalyst: An evaluation of a pilot project.Journal of the Community Development Society19 (1): 37-50.
34.
Lofland, L.
1998. The public realm.New York: Walter de Gruyter.
35.
MacNeil, C.
, and B. Krensky. 1996. A Project YES Case Study.Education and Urban Society28 (2): 176-188.
36.
Mark, Peter
. 1994. Art, ritual, and folklore: Dance and cultural identity among the peoples of Casamance.Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines4 (136): 563-584.
37.
McAdam, D.1989. The biographical consequences of activism.American Sociological Review54:744-760.
38.
Mead, G.
1934. Mind, self and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Milligan, M.1998. Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment.Symbolic Interaction21 (1): 1-33.
40.
Overton, P.1987. Arts development in rural and small towns.Connections Quarterly (Winter):12ff.
41.
Park, R.
1952. Human communities.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Parsons, T.
1951. The social system.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Pred, A.1983. Structuration and place: On the becoming of sense of place and structure of feeling.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior13 (1): 45-68.
45.
Raven, A.
1993. Art in the public interest.New York: Da Capo Press.
46.
Sampson, R.
, and J. Laub. 1993. Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds.American Sociological Review55 (5): 609-627.
47.
Sampson, R.
, S. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of efficacy.Science227:918-924.
48.
Search Institute
. 1995. Profiles of student life: Attitudes and behaviorsMinneapolis: Search Institute.
49.
Stein, S.
1996. The co-construction of learning.Estes Park, CO: High Plains Society for Applied Anthropology.
50.
Stoddard, P.1992-1993. Community theory: New perspectives for the 1990s.The Journal of Applied Social Sciences17 (1): 13-30.
51.
Sutton, W.
, and T. Munson. 1976. Definitions of community, 1954-1973. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, August 1976.
52.
Tönnies, F.
1967. Community and society.East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
53.
Tuan, Y.
1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
54.
Weitz, J.
1996. Coming up taller: Arts and humanities programs for children and youth at risk.Washington, DC: President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
55.
Wellman, B.1979. The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers.American Journal of Sociology84 (5): 1201-1231.
56.
Wilson, G.
, and M. Baldassare. 1996. Overall `Sense of Community' in a suburban region: The effects of localism, privacy, and urbanization.Environment and Behavior28 (1): 27-43.
57.
Wireman, P.
1984. Urban neighborhoods, networks, and families: New forms for old values.Lexington, MA: Lexington.
58.
Wirth, L.1938. Urbanism as a way of life.American Journal of Sociology44 (July): 1-24.
59.
Wositsky, H.1998. Out of the ashes, a community responds: The Dandenong Ranges bushfires.Australian Journal of Emergency Management (Winter): 17-20.
