AndersonS. F.KelleyK.MaxwellS. E. (2017). Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1547–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617723724
4.
BabbieE. R. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
BellM. L.WhiteheadA. L.JuliousS. A. (2018). Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clinical Epidemiology, 10, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S146397
BurkeJ. F.SussmanJ. B.KentD. M.HaywardR. A. (2015). Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses. BMJ, 351, h5651. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5651
9.
BusettoL.WickW.GumbingerC. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
10.
CarlinJ. B.DoyleL. W. (2001). Statistics for clinicians: 4: Basic concepts of statistical reasoning: hypothesis tests and the t-test. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 37(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00634.x
DeanA.SullivanK.SoeM. (2013). Open source epidemiologic statistics for public health (Version 3.01). http://www.openepi.com/
15.
DurlakJ. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
HalpernS. D.KarlawishJ. H. T.BerlinJ. A. (2002). The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA, 288(3), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.3.358
22.
HeckmanM. G.DavisJ. M.CrowsonC. S. (2022). Post hoc power calculations: An inappropriate method for interpreting the findings of a research study. The Journal of Rheumatology, 49(8), 867–870. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211115
23.
HussainS. J.CohenL. G. (2017). Exploratory studies: A crucial step towards better hypothesis-driven confirmatory research in brain stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 595(4), 1013–1014. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP273582
KangH. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17
26.
KoM. J.LimC.-Y. (2021). General considerations for sample size estimation in animal study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 74(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.20662
27.
LedolterJ.KardonR. H. (2020). Focus on data: Statistical design of experiments and sample size selection using power analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 61(8), 11. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.8.11
28.
MaierM.LakensD. (2022). Justify your alpha: A primer on two practical approaches. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), 25152459221080396. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221080396
29.
MartensM. J.LoganB. R. (2021). A unified approach to sample size and power determination for testing parameters in generalized linear and time-to-event regression models. Statistics in Medicine, 40(5), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8823
30.
MartinM. A. (2003). “It’s like. . . you know”: The use of analogies and heuristics in teaching introductory statistical methods. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2003.11910705
31.
MatthayE. C.HaganE.GottliebL. M.TanM. L.VlahovD.AdlerN.GlymourM. M. (2021). Powering population health research: Considerations for plausible and actionable effect sizes. SSM - Population Health, 14, Article 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100789
PeruginiM.GallucciM.CostantiniG. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181
35.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2010). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson.
StebbinsR. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (1st ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
38.
SwedbergR. (2020). Exploratory research. In ElmanC.MahoneyJ.GerringJ. (Eds.), The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science (pp. 17–41). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.002
39.
VadilloM. A.KonstantinidisE.ShanksD. R. (2016). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0892-6
40.
VandenbrouckeJ. P.von ElmE.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C.MulrowC. D.PocockS. J.PooleC.SchlesselmanJ. J.EggerM.; STROBE Initiative. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 4(10), e297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
41.
WagenmakersE.-J.WetzelsR.BorsboomD.van der MaasH. L. J.KievitR. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
ZhangY.HedoR.RiveraA.RullR.RichardsonS.TuX. M. (2019). Post hoc power analysis: Is it an informative and meaningful analysis?General Psychiatry, 32(4), e100069. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100069