Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In aging models, well-being and functioning are two pillars that are closely intertwined. Given older adults’ susceptibility to compromised health, understanding whether well-being improvements could enhance future functioning or vice versa may be important for promoting healthy aging. However, few empirical studies have examined these reciprocal relationships over long periods using representative older adult samples and longitudinal models designed to infer causality. We used 12 years of panel data from older U.S. adults (National Health and Aging Trends Study; N = 12,427) to examine within-person reciprocal effects between well-being (emotional well-being, purpose) and functioning (self-reported health, memory). We employed variations on the Stable Trait, Autoregressive Trait, State (STARTS) model for each variable to disentangle between-person stable trait and/or occasion-specific state variances. We found very high within-person stability for well-being and functioning variables and little evidence for reciprocal effects over time. The robustness of these results and their sensitivity to different assumptions were assessed by comparing simpler models. Our findings underscore the utility of sophisticated longitudinal modeling in aging research and contribute to theoretical discussions on the causal relationship between well-being and functioning.

Plain language summary

In older adulthood, well-being and healthy functioning are essential for aging well. However, it is necessary to clarify how these aspects influence each other, such as whether being happy makes people healthier or vice versa. The current study examined the reciprocal link between well-being (emotional well-being, purpose) and functioning (self-rated health and memory) for the older adults. We analyzed 12 years of data from more than 12,000 older adults aged 65 or older in the U.S., using sophisticated longitudinal models that better isolate within-person systematic changes. Our results showed that individuals' health and well-being stayed very stable over the years, and there was limited evidence that changes in one led to changes in the other. Our work contributes to ongoing discussion about causality in aging literature and offers a careful methodological approach for future research.

Keywords

well-being functioning aging longitudinal analysis cross-lagged effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allerhand

Gale

C. R.

Deary

I. J.

(2014). The dynamic relationship between cognitive function and positive well-being in older people: A prospective study using the English longitudinal study of aging. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036551

Antonucci

T. C.

Birditt

K. S.

(2011). Convoys of social relations: Past, present, and future. In Fingerman

K. L.

Berg

C. A.

Smith

Antonucci

T. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of lifespan development (pp. 161–182). New York, NY: Springer.

Anusic

Lucas

R. E.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2012). Dependability of personality, life satisfaction, and affect in short-term longitudinal data: Dependability in short-term studies. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00714.x

Anusic

Schimmack

(2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066

Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation.In. In Baltes

P. B.

Baltes

M. M.

(Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684.003

Benyamini

Idler

E. L.

Leventhal

E. A.

(2000). Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: Expanding our view beyond illness and disability. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(2), P107–P116. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.2.P107

Berk

Van Boxtel

Köhler

Van Os

(2017). Positive affect and cognitive decline: A 12‐year follow‐up of the Maastricht aging study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32(12), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4611

Berry

Willoughby

M. T.

(2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660

Black

S. V.

Cooper

Martin

K. R.

Brage

Kuh

Stafford

(2015). Physical activity and mental well-being in a cohort aged 60-64 years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.009

10.

Blanchflower

D. G.

Oswald

A. J.

Stewart-Brown

(2013). Is psychological well-being linked to the consumption of fruit and vegetables? Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0173-y

11.

Bonsang

Klein

T. J.

(2012). Retirement and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.06.002

12.

Brief

A. P.

Butcher

A. H.

George

J. M.

Link

K. E.

(1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.646

13.

Carstensen

L. L.

Isaacowitz

D. M.

Charles

S. T.

(1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165

14.

Charles

S. T.

(2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1068–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021232

15.

Chen

Weziak-Bialowolska

Lee

M. T.

Bialowolski

McNeely

VanderWeele

T. J.

(2022). Longitudinal associations between domains of flourishing. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06626-5

16.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5

17.

Cho

Lee

Woo

(2016). A comparative study on retirement process in Korea, Germany, and the United States: Identifying determinants of retirement process: Identifying determinants of retirement process. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 83(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016657556

18.

Cohen

Pressman

S. D.

(2006). Positive affect and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(3), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00420.x

19.

Czekierda

Banik

Park

C. L.

Luszczynska

(2017). Meaning in life and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 11(4), 387–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1327325

20.

Dewitte

Hill

P. L.

Vandenbulcke

Dezutter

(2022). The longitudinal relationship between meaning in life, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, and cognitive functioning for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease. European Journal of Ageing, 19(4), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00689-z

21.

Dewitte

Lewis

N. A.

Payne

B. R.

Turiano

N. A.

Hill

P. L.

(2021). Cross-lagged relationships between sense of purpose in life, memory performance, and subjective memory beliefs in adulthood over a 9-year interval. Aging & Mental Health, 25(11), 2018–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1822284

22.

Diener

(1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

23.

Diener

Chan

M. Y.

(2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x

24.

Diener

Pressman

S. D.

Hunter

Delgadillo-Chase

(2017). If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090

25.

Dolan

Peasgood

White

(2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001

26.

Driver

C. C.

Voelkle

M. C.

(2018). Understanding the time course of interventions with continuous time dynamic models. In van Montfort

Oud

J. H. L.

Voelkle

M. C.

(Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 79–109). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77219-6_4

27.

Eronen

M. I.

(2020). Causal discovery and the problem of psychological interventions. New Ideas in Psychology, 59, Article 100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100785

28.

Estebsari

Dastoorpoor

Khalifehkandi

Z. R.

Nouri

Mostafaei

Hosseini

Esmaeili

Aghababaeian

(2020). The concept of successful aging: A review article. Current Aging Science, 13(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609812666191023130117

29.

Falkenström

Solomonov

Rubel

(2023). To detrend, or not to detrend, that is the question? The effects of detrending on cross-lagged effects in panel models. Psychological Methods. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000632

30.

Fayers

P. M.

Sprangers

M. A. G.

(2002). Understanding self-rated health. Lancet, 359(9302), 187–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07466-4

31.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Cohn

M. A.

Coffey

K. A.

Pek

Finkel

S. M.

(2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013262

32.

Freedman

V. A.

Schrack

J. A.

Skehan

M. E.

(2023). National health and aging trends study user guide: Rounds 1-12 final release. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. https://www.nhats.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/NHATS_User_Guide_R12_Final_Release_04092024.pdf

33.

Freund

A. M.

Nikitin

Riediger

(2013). Successful aging. In Lerner

R. M.

(Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 615–637). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. xix. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28462-025

34.

Gana

Bailly

Saada

Joulain

Trouillet

Hervé

Alaphilippe

(2013). Relationship between life satisfaction and physical health in older adults: A longitudinal test of cross-lagged and simultaneous effects. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32(8), 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031656

35.

Gerstorf

Lövdén

Röcke

Smith

Lindenberger

(2007). Well-being affects changes in perceptual speed in advanced old age: Longitudinal evidence for a dynamic link. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.705

36.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

37.

Grosz

M. P.

Rohrer

J. M.

Thoemmes

(2020). The taboo against explicit causal inference in nonexperimental psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(5), 1243–1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620921521

38.

Hallquist

M. N.

Wiley

J. F.

(2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334

39.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P. P. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889

40.

Hernán

M. A.

Cole

S. R.

(2009). Invited commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(8), 959–962. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp293

41.

Hill

P. L.

Weston

S. J.

(2019). Evaluating eight-year trajectories for sense of purpose in the health and retirement study. Aging & Mental Health, 23(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1399344

42.

Hittner

E. F.

Stephens

J. E.

Turiano

N. A.

Gerstorf

Lachman

M. E.

Haase

C. M.

(2020). Positive affect is associated with less memory decline: Evidence from a 9-Year longitudinal study. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620953883

43.

Howell

R. T.

Kern

M. L.

Lyubomirsky

(2007). Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1(1), 83–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190701492486

44.

L.-T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

45.

Hudson

N. W.

Lucas

R. E.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2019). Healthier and happier? A 3-year longitudinal investigation of the prospective associations and concurrent changes in health and experiential well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1635–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219838547

46.

Hughes

M. L.

Agrigoroaei

Jeon

Lachman

M. E.

(2018). Change in cognitive performance from midlife into old age: Findings from the midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 24(8), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617718000425

47.

Hülür

Hertzog

Pearman

Ram

Gerstorf

(2014). Longitudinal associations of subjective memory with memory performance and depressive symptoms: Between-person and within-person perspectives. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037619

48.

Jylhä

(2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science & Medicine, 69(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013

49.

Kenny

D. A.

Zautra

(1995). The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.1.52

50.

Kenny

D. A.

Zautra

(2001). Trait–state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.). New methods for the analysis of change (Vol. 442, pp. 243–263). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10409-008

51.

Kim

E. S.

Shiba

Boehm

J. K.

Kubzansky

L. D.

(2020). Sense of purpose in life and five health behaviors in older adults. Preventive Medicine, 139, Article 106172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106172

52.

Kim

Shin

S. H.

Scicolone

M. A.

Parmelee

(2019). Purpose in life protects against cognitive decline among older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(6), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.010

53.

Krantz

D. S.

McCeney

M. K.

(2002). Effects of psychological and social factors on organic disease: A critical assessment of research on coronary heart disease. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 341–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135208

54.

Krause

Shaw

B. A.

(2003). Role-specific control, personal meaning, and health in late life. Research on Aging, 25(6), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503256695

55.

Kuiper

R. M.

Ryan

(2018). Drawing conclusions from cross-lagged relationships: Re-considering the role of the time-interval. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1431046

56.

Lee

Vlaev

King

Mayer

Darzi

Dolan

(2013). Subjective well-being and the measurement of quality in healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 99(Special issue), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.027

57.

Lewis

N. A.

Brazeau

Hill

P. L.

(2020). Adjusting after stroke: Changes in sense of purpose in life and the role of social support, relationship strain, and time. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(12), 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318772656

58.

Loh

W. W.

Ren

(2023). A tutorial on causal inference in longitudinal data with time-varying confounding using G-estimation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), Article 25152459231174029. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231174029

59.

Lucas

R. E.

(2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.717

60.

Lucas

R. E.

(2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), Article 25152459231158378. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231158378

61.

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

(2021). A critique of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6f85c

62.

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

(2022). A comparison of different approaches for estimating cross-lagged effects from a causal inference perspective. Structural Equation Modeling, 29(6), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2065278

63.

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

Ulitzsch

(2023). A Bayesian approach to estimating reciprocal effects with the bivariate STARTS model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(3), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2039585

64.

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

Wagner

(2017). More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000155

65.

Macias

Gold

P. B.

Öngür

Cohen

B. M.

Panch

(2015). Are single-item global ratings useful for assessing health status? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 22(4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-015-9436-5

66.

Maier

Smith

(1999). Psychological predictors of mortality in old age. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(1), P44–P54. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.1.P44

67.

Martela

Steger

M. F.

(2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623

68.

Michel

J.-P.

Sadana

(2017). “Healthy aging” concepts and measures. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(6), 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.008

69.

Mulder

J. D.

Hamaker

E. L.

(2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738

70.

Murayama

Gfrörer

(2024). Thinking clearly about time-invariant confounders in cross-lagged panel models: A guide for choosing a statistical model from a causal inference perspective. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000647

71.

Nyström

M. B. T.

Sörman

D. E.

Kormi-Nouri

Rönnlund

(2019). To what extent is subjective well-being in late adulthood related to subjective and objective memory functioning? Five-year cross-lagged panel analyses. Aging & Mental Health, 23(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1394439

72.

Ofstedal

M. B.

Fisher

G. G.

Herzog

A. R.

(2005). Documentation of cognitive functioning measures in the health and retirement study (Vol. 10). University of Michigan.

73.

Orth

Clark

D. A.

Donnellan

M. B.

Robins

R. W.

(2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358

74.

Orth

Meier

L. L.

Bühler

J. L.

Dapp

L. C.

Krauss

Messerli

Robins

R. W.

(2024). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods, 29(2), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499

75.

Oswald

A. J.

(2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180606

76.

Pfund

G. N.

Burrow

A. L.

Hill

P. L.

(2024). Purpose in daily life: Considering within-person sense of purpose variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 109(4), Article 104473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104473

77.

Pfund

G. N.

DeLongis

Sin

Morstead

Hill

P. L.

(2022). Being active for a purpose: Evaluating the bi-directional associations between monthly purpose and physical activity. Social Science & Medicine, 310(4), Article 115300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115300

78.

Pfund

G. N.

James

Willroth

(2025). Bidirectional relationships between well-being and cognitive function. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qj4xh_v1

79.

Pfund

G. N.

Lewis

N. A.

(2020). Aging with purpose: Developmental changes and benefits of purpose in life throughout the lifespan. In Hill

P. L.

Allemand

(Eds.), Personality and healthy aging in adulthood: New directions and techniques (pp. 27–42). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_3

80.

Pinquart

(2002). Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: A meta-analysis. Ageing International, 27(2), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-002-1004-2

81.

Potter

Bridger

Drewelies

(2025). Daily health and well‐being in adulthood and old age: The role of adverse childhood experiences. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 17(1), Article e12637. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12637

82.

Pressman

S. D.

Cohen

(2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925

83.

Pressman

S. D.

Jenkins

B. N.

Moskowitz

J. T.

(2019). Positive affect and health: What do we know and where next should we go? Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102955

84.

Reker

G. T.

Peacock

E. J.

Wong

P. T.

(1987). Meaning and purpose in life and well-being: A life-span perspective. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/42.1.44

85.

Richardson-Klavehn

Bjork

R. A.

(1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 475–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.002355

86.

Rohrer

J. M.

(2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629

87.

Rohrer

J. M.

Lucas

R. E.

(2020). Causal effects of well-being on health: It’s complicated. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wgbe4

88.

Rohrer

J. M.

Murayama

(2023). These are not the effects you are looking for: Causality and the within-/between-persons distinction in longitudinal data analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221140842

89.

Rowe

J. W.

Kahn

R. L.

(1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433

90.

Røysamb

Tambs

Reichborn-Kjennerud

Neale

M. C.

Harris

J. R.

(2003). Happiness and health: Environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1136

91.

Ryff

C. D.

(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

92.

Ryff

C. D.

Boylan

J. M.

Kirsch

J. A.

(2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. In Measuring well-being (pp. 92–135). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0005

93.

Salthouse

T. A.

(2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x

94.

Schisterman

E. F.

Cole

S. R.

Platt

R. W.

(2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20(4), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1

95.

Schöllgen

Morack

Infurna

F. J.

Ram

Gerstorf

(2016). Health sensitivity: Age differences in the within-person coupling of individuals’ physical health and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1944–1953. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000171

96.

Steptoe

(2019). Happiness and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 40(1), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044150

97.

Steptoe

O’Donnell

Marmot

Wardle

(2008). Positive affect, psychological well-being, and good sleep. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.11.008

98.

Steptoe

Wardle

(2005). Positive affect and biological function in everyday life. Neurobiology of Aging, 26(1, Supplement), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.08.016

99.

Usami

Murayama

Hamaker

E. L.

(2019). A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000210

100.

Wagner

Guimond

A.-J.

Kubzansky

L. D.

Zhang

Bennett

D. A.

Barnes

L. L.

Grodstein

(2022). Negative and positive psychosocial factors in relation to cognitive health in older African Americans. Innovation in Aging, 6(3), igac019. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac019

101.

Watson

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96(2), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234

102.

Western

Tomaszewski

(2016). Subjective wellbeing, objective wellbeing and inequality in Australia. PLoS One, 11(10), Article e0163345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163345

103.

Westfall

Yarkoni

(2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11(3), Article e0152719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719

104.

Weziak-Bialowolska

Bialowolski

(2022). Bidirectional associations between meaning in life and the health, emotional ill-being and daily life functioning outcomes among older adults. Psychology and Health, 39(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2105842

105.

Willroth

E. C.

Pfund

G. N.

McGhee

Rule

(2023). Well-being as a protective factor against cognitive decline and dementia: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 78(5), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad020

106.

Wilson

R. S.

Boyle

P. A.

Segawa

Begeny

C. T.

Anagnos

S. E.

Bennett

D. A.

(2013). The influence of cognitive decline on well-being in old age. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031196

107.

Windsor

T. D.

Curtis

R. G.

Luszcz

M. A.

(2015). Sense of purpose as a psychological resource for aging well. Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000023

108.

Wang

Zhao

Yan

(2013). The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: A population-based study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 320. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-320

109.

Wysocki

A. C.

Lawson

K. M.

Rhemtulla

(2022). Statistical control requires causal justification. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), Article 251524592210958. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221095823

110.

Yemiscigil

Vlaev

(2021). The bidirectional relationship between sense of purpose in life and physical activity: A longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 44(5), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00220-2

111.

Zawadzki

M. J.

Smyth

J. M.

Sliwinski

M. J.

Ruiz

J. M.

Gerin

(2017). Revisiting the lack of association between affect and physiology: Contrasting between-person and within-person analyses. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 36(8), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000466

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

Revisiting reciprocal links between well-being and functioning in aging: A STARTS and constrained modeling approach

Abstract

Plain language summary

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material