We tested birth order effects on selection into different careers (scientific, artistic, and creative) and status attainment (educational attainment, occupational prestige, and income) using a large sample (n = 3763), a longitudinal design, and relevant controls. Additionally, we tested mediation of birth order effects on career outcomes via personality traits, intelligence, and educational attainment. We found negligible birth order effects ranging from 0.02 to 0.12 on a correlational metric, where firstborns (vs. laterborns) selected into more creative careers and attained higher prestige and education. Conditional on the theoretically based mediation models tested, results showed that intelligence and educational attainment (but not personality traits) accounted for a statistically significant portion of the variance in the links between birth order and career outcomes. No direct effects of birth order on career outcomes remained when accounting for indirect effects through educational attainment. These findings bring modest support to the confluence model, no support to the niche-finding model, and suggest that one possible route via which birth order might impact career outcomes (if at all) could be via educational attainment.
AlwinD. F.HauserR. M. (1975).
The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review,
40, 37–47.
2.
BaerM.OldhamG. R.HollingsheadA. B.Costa JacobsohnG. (2005).
Revisiting the birth order-creativity connection: The role of sibling constellation. Creativity Research Journal,
17, 67–77.
3.
BarclayK. J. (2015).
Birth order and educational attainment: Evidence from fully adopted sibling groups. Intelligence,
48, 109–122.
4.
BarclayK.HällstenM.MyrskyläM. (2017).
Birth order and college major in Sweden. Social Forces,
96, 629–660.
5.
BeckerG. S.TomesN. (1979).
An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy,
87, 1153–1189.
6.
BjerkedalT.KristensenP.SkjeretG. A.BrevikJ. I. (2007).
Intelligence test scores and birth order among young Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families. Intelligence,
35, 503–514.
7.
BjörklundA.JänttiM. (2012).
How important is family background for labor economic outcomes?Labour Economics,
19, 465–474.
8.
BlackS. E.DevereuxP. J.SalvanesK. G. (2005).
The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
120, 669–700.
9.
BlackS. E.DevereuxP. J.SalvanesK. G. (2011).
Older and wiser? Birth order and IQ of young men. CESifo Economic Studies,
57, 103–120.
10.
BlackS. E.GrönqvistE.ÖckertB. (2018).
Born to lead? the effect of birth order on noncognitive abilities. Review of Economics and Statistics,
100, 274–286.
11.
BlakeJ. (1981).
Family size and the quality of children. Demography,
18, 421–442.
12.
BlissW. D. (1970).
Birth order of creative writers. Journal of Individual Psychology,
26, 200–202.
13.
BotzetL.RohrerJ. M.ArslanR. C. (2020). Analysing Effects of Birth Order on Intelligence, Educational Attainment, Big Five, and Risk Aversion in an Indonesian Sample. European Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1002/per.2285.
14.
BryantB. L. (1987).
Birth order as a factor in the development of vocational preferences. Individual Psychology,
43, 36–41.
15.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010).
Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
98, 550–558.
16.
CardadorM. T.DamianR. I.WiegandJ. P. (2020).
Does more mean less? Interest surplus and the gender gap in STEM careers. Journal of Career Assessment. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/1069072720930658
17.
ChuardP. J.VrtílekM.HeadM. L.JennionsM. D. (2019).
Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?PLoS Biology,
17, e3000127.
18.
CummingG. (2014).
The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science,
25, 7–29.
19.
DamianR. I.RobertsB. W. (2015a).
The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of US high school students. Journal of Research in Personality,
58, 96–105.
20.
DamianR. I.RobertsB. W. (2015b).
Settling the debate on birth order and personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
112, 14119–14120.
21.
DamianR. I.SpenglerM.RobertsB. W. (2017).
Whose job will be taken over by a computer? The role of personality in predicting job computerizability over the lifespan. European Journal of Personality,
31, 291–310.
22.
DamianR. I.SuR.ShanahanM.TrautweinU.RobertsB. W. (2015).
Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
109, 473–489.
23.
DavisJ. N. (1997).
Birth order, sibship size, and status in modern Canada. Human Nature,
8, 205–230.
24.
DearyI. J. (2012).
Intelligence.Annual Review of Psychology,
63, 453–482.
25.
DiStefanoC.ZhuM.MindrilaD. (2009).
Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,
14, Article 20.
26.
DixonM. M.ReyesC. J.LeppertM. F.PappasL. M. (2008).
Personality and birth order in large families. Personality and Individual Differences,
44, 119–128.
27.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis.
Guilford Press.
28.
ErnstC.AngstJ. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality.
Springer.
29.
FiedlerK.HarrisC.SchottM. (2018).
Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests—An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
75, 95–102.
30.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011).
What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
47, 1231–1236.
31.
FischerT. (2007).
Parental divorce and children’s socio-economic success: Conditional effects of parental resources prior to divorce, and gender of the child. Sociology,
41, 475–495.
32.
GrätzM.TorcheF. (2016).
Compensation or reinforcement? The stratification of parental responses to children’s early ability. Demography,
53, 1883–1904.
33.
GuilfordJ. P. (1957).
Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review,
64, 110–118.
34.
HeckmanJ. J. (2006).
Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science,
312(5782), 1900–1902.
35.
HerreraN. C.ZajoncR. B.WieczorkowskaG.CichomskiB. (2003).
Beliefs about birth rank and their reflection in reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
85, 142–150.
36.
HertwigR.DavisJ. N.SullowayF. J. (2002).
Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin,
128, 728.
37.
HoganR.RobertsB. W. (2004).
A socioanalytic model of maturity. Journal of Career Assessment,
12, 207–217.
38.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
39.
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 25.0.
40.
IoannidisJ. P. (2005).
Why most published research findings are false. PLos Medicine,
2, e124.
41.
KelleyK.PreacherK. J. (2012).
On effect size. Psychological Methods,
17, 137–152.
42.
KrausM. W.OnyeadorI. N.DaumeyerN. M.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2019).
The misperception of racial economic inequality. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
14, 899–921.
43.
KristensenP.BjerkedalT. (2010).
Educational attainment of 25 year old Norwegians according to birth order and gender. Intelligence,
38(1), 123–136.
44.
LejarragaT.FreyR.SchnitzleinD. D.HertwigR. (2019).
No effect of birth order on adult risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
116, 6019–6024.
45.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling.
Guilford Press.
46.
LynchR. M.LynchJ. (1980).
Birth order and vocational preference. The Journal of Experimental Education,
49, 15–18.
47.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002).
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods,
7, 83–104.
48.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
49.
PetersonR.A.BrownS.P. (2005).
On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,
90, 175–181.
50.
PriceJ. (2008).
Parent-child quality time does birth order matter?Journal of Human Resources,
43, 240–265.
51.
RodgersJ.ClevelandH.van den OordE.RoweD. (2000).
Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist,
55, 599–612.
52.
RoeA. (1953). The making of a scientist. Dodd, Mead.
53.
RohrerJ. M. (2018).
Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
1, 27–42.
RohrerJ. M.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2015).
Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
112, 14224–14229.
56.
RohrerJ. M.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2017).
Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis. Psychological Science,
28, 1821–1832.
57.
RoundsJ.ArmstrongP. I.LiaoH. Y.LewisP.RivkinD. (2008). Second generation occupational interest profiles for the O* NET system: Summary.
The National Center for O* NET Development.
58.
RuncoM. A.BahledaM. D. (1987).
Birth-order and divergent thinking. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,
148, 119–125.
59.
SampsonE. E.HancockF. T. (1967).
An examination of the relationship between ordinal position, personality, and conformity: An extension, replication, and partial verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
5, 398.
60.
SimontonD. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and Zeitgeist.
Cambridge University Press.
61.
SpenglerM.DamianR. I.RobertsB. W. (2018).
How you behave in school predicts life success above and beyond family background, broad traits, and cognitive ability?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
114, 620–636.
62.
SteinM. I. (1953).
Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology,
36, 31–322.
63.
StoneC.ScottL.BattleD.MaherP. (2014).
Locating longitudinal respondents after a 50-year hiatus. Journal of Official Statistics,
30, 311–334.
64.
SuR. (2012). The power of vocational interests and interest congruence in predicting careersuccess [doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
65.
SullowayF. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order family dynamics, and creative lives.
Pantheon Books.
66.
SullowayF. J.ZweigenhaftR. L. (2010).
Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
4, 402–416.
67.
SutuA.SerranoS.SchultzL.JacksonJ. JDamianR. I. (2019).
Creating through deviancy or adjustment? The link between personality profile normativeness and creativity. European Journal of Personality,
33, 565–588.
68.
TateC. U. (2015).
On the overuse and misuse of mediation analysis: It may be a matter of timing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
37, 235–246.
69.
ThoemmesF.MohanK. (2015).
Graphical representation of missing data problems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
22, 631–642.
70.
WichmanA. L.RodgersJ. L.MacCallumR. C. (2006).
A multilevel approach to the relationship between birth order and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
32(1), 117–127.
71.
WiseL.McLaughlinD.SteelL. (1979). The Project TALENT data bank handbook, revised.
American Institutes for Research.
72.
ZajoncR. (2001).
The family dynamics of intellectual development. American Psychologist,
56, 490–496.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
