To evaluate the effects of financial incentives on physical activity (PA).
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, Embase, 7 other databases, and 2 trial registries until July 17, 2019.
Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:
Randomized controlled trials with adults aged ≥18 years assessing the effect of financial incentives on PA. Any comparator was eligible provided the only difference between groups was the incentive strategy.
Data Extraction:
Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Of 5765 records identified, 57 records (51 unique trials; n = 17 773 participants) were included.
Data Synthesis:
Random-effects models pooling data for each of the 5 PA domains.
Results:
Financial incentives increase leisure time PA (gym or class attendance; standardized mean difference [95% CI], 0.46 [0.28-0.63], n = 5057) and walking behavior (steps walked; 0.25 [0.13-0.36], n = 3254). No change in total minutes of PA (0.52 [−0.09 to 1.12], n = 968), kilocalories expended (0.19 [−0.06 to 0.44], n = 247), or the proportion of participants meeting PA guidelines (risk ratio [95% CI] 1.53 [0.53-4.44], n = 650) postintervention was observed. After intervention has ceased, incentives sustain a slight increase in leisure time PA (0.10 [0.02-0.18], n = 2678) and walking behavior (0.11 [0.00-0.22], n = 2425).
Conclusions:
Incentives probably improve leisure time PA and walking at intervention end, and small improvements may be sustained over time once incentives have ceased. They lead to little or no difference in kilocalories expended or minutes of PA. It is uncertain whether incentives change the likelihood of meeting PA guidelines because the certainty of the evidence is low.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. DwightDE, ed. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
2.
LeeI-MShiromaEJLobeloF, et al.Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229.
3.
HallalPCAndersenLBBullFC, et al.Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–257.
4.
McGillBO’HaraBJBaumanAGrunseitACPhongsavanP. Are financial incentives for lifestyle behavior change informed or inspired by behavioral economics? A mapping review. Ame J Health Promot. 2019;33(1):131–141.
5.
GilesELRobalinoSMcCollESniehottaFFAdamsJ. The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2014;9(3):e90347.
6.
MatjaskoJLCawleyJHBaker-GoeringMMYokumDV. Applying behavioral economics to public health policy: illustrative examples and promising directions. Ame J Prevent Med. 2016;50(5):13–19.
7.
HaffNPatelMSLimR, et al.The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis. Ame J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):314–323.
8.
O’DonoghueTRabinM. Doing it now or later. Ame Econo Rev. 1999;89(1):103–124.
9.
AclandDLevyMR. Naivete, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Manage Sci. 2015;61(1):146–160.
10.
van der SwaluwKLambooijMSMathijssenJJ, et al.Commitment lotteries promote physical activity among overweight adults—a cluster randomized trial. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(4):342–351.
11.
ChokshiNPAdusumalliSSmallDS, et al.Loss-framed financial incentives and personalized goal-setting to increase physical activity among ischemic heart disease patients using wearable devices: the active reward randomized trial. J Ame Heart Associat. 2018;7(12):1–10.
12.
BabcockPBedardKCharnessGHartmanJRoyerH. Letting Down the Team? Evidence of Social Effects of Team Incentives. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011.
13.
CappsKHJohnB. Employee health & productivity management programs: the use of incentives. A survey of major U.S. employers. The Results of the Spring 2008 Health, Wellness & Productivity Programs. Incentives & ROI Impact Survey; 2008.
14.
LosinaECollinsJEDeshpandeBR, et al.Financial incentives and health coaching to improve physical activity following total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Arth Care Res. 2018;70(5):732–740.
15.
GongYTrentadueTPShresthaSLosinaECollinsJE. Financial incentives for objectively-measured physical activity or weight loss in adults with chronic health conditions: a meta-analysis. Plos One. 2018;13(9):16.
16.
MitchellMSGoodmanJMAlterDA, et al.Financial incentives for exercise adherence in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ame J Prevent Med. 2013;45(5):658–667.
17.
MolemaCCWendel-VosGWPuijkLJensenJDSchuitAJde WitGA. A systematic review of financial incentives given in the healthcare setting; do they effectively improve physical activity levels?BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2016;8(1):15.
18.
BarteJCWendel-VosG. A systematic review of financial incentives for physical activity: the effects on physical activity and related outcomes. Behav Med. 2017;43(2):79–90.
19.
StrohackerKGalarragaOWilliamsDM. The impact of incentives on exercise behavior: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(1):92–99.
20.
MitchellMSOrstadSLBiswasA, et al.Financial incentives for physical activity in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. British J Sports Med. 2019:bjsports–2019-100633. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-100633
21.
FinkelsteinEABilgerMBaidD. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of incentives as a tool for prevention of non-communicable diseases: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2019;232:340–350.
22.
AdamsJGilesELMcCollESniehottaFF. Carrots, sticks and health behaviours: a framework for documenting the complexity of financial incentive interventions to change health behaviours. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(3):286–295.
23.
MichieSPrestwichA. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):1.
24.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al.The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.
25.
GoldenSDEarpJAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educat Behav. 2012;39(3):364–372.
26.
HigginsJLassersonTChandlerJToveyDChurchillR. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. Cochrane; 2016.
27.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
28.
LuongMLNBennellKLHallMHarrisAHinmanRS. The impact of financial incentives on physical activity in adults: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):21.
29.
OgilvieDEganMHamiltonVPetticrewM. Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329(7469):763.
30.
CounsellC. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Int Med. 1997;127(5):380–387.
31.
World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010.
32.
HoffmannTCGlasziouPPBoutronI, et al.Better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. British Med J. 2014;348:g1687.
33.
HoffmannTCOxmanADIoannidisJP, et al.Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions. BMJ. 2017;358(2):j2998.
34.
MitchellMSGoodmanJMAlterDAOhPIFaulknerGE. Development of the Health Incentive Program Questionnaire (HIP-Q) in a cardiac rehabilitation population. Translat Behav Med. 2015;5(4):443–459.
35.
StrathSJKaminskyLAAinsworthBE, et al.Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications. Circulation. 2013;128(20):2259–2279.
36.
PageMJMcKenzieJEChauMGreenSEForbesA. Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1282–1291.
37.
HigginsJGreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
38.
HigginsJAltmanD. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: HigginsJGreenS, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley; 2008:187–241.
39.
HigginsJPAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
40.
SchwarzerG. Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 2007;7(3):40–45.
41.
ViechtbauerW. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Statist Software. 2010;36(3):1–48.
42.
IntHoutJIoannidisJPRoversMMGoemanJJ. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010247.
43.
SavitzDAWelleniusGATrikalinosTA. The problem with mechanistic risk of bias assessments in evidence synthesis of observational studies and a practical alternative: assess the impact of specific sources of potential bias. Ame J Epidemiol. 2019.
44.
KossmeierMTranUSVoracekM. Metaviz: forest plots, funnel plots, and visual funnel plot inference for meta-analysis. 2019.
45.
PetersJLSuttonAJJonesDRAbramsKRRushtonL. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(10):991–996.
The GRADE Working Group. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. SchünemannHBrożekJGuyattGOxmanA, eds. Published 2013. Updated October 2013. Guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook.
48.
BachireddyCJoungAJohnLK, et al.Effect of Different Financial Incentive Structures on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA network open 2019; 2: e199863-e199863.
49.
KramerJNTinschertPScholzUFleischEKowatschT. A cluster-randomized trial on small incentives to promote physical activity. Ame J Prevent Med. 2018;56(2):e45–e54.
50.
ShepichJSlowiakJMKenistonA. Do subsidization and monitoring enhance adherence to prescribed exercise?Ame J Health Promot. 2007;22(1):2–5.
51.
JefferyRWWingRRThorsonCBurtonLR. Use of personal trainers and financial incentives to increaseexercise in a behavioral weight-loss program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology1998;66:777–783.
52.
BassettDRTothLPLaMunionSRCrouterSE. Step counting: a review of measurement considerations and health-related applications. Sport Med. 2017;47(7):1303–1315.
53.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
54.
DwyerTPezicASunC, et al.Objectively measured daily steps and subsequent long term all-cause mortality: the Tasped prospective cohort study. PloS One. 2015;10(11):e0141274.
55.
LeeIMShiromaEJKamadaMBassettDRMatthewsCEBuringJE. Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Int Med. 2019.
56.
DemeyerHBurtinCHornikxM, et al.The minimal important difference in physical activity in patients with COPD. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154587.
57.
MotlRWPiluttiLALearmonthYCGoldmanMDBrownT. Clinical importance of steps taken per day among persons with multiple sclerosis. PloS One. 2013;8(9):e73247.
58.
KalethASSlavenJEAngDC. Does increasing steps per day predict improvement in physical function and pain interference in adults with fibromyalgia?Arth Care Res. 2014;66(12):1887–1894.
59.
O’DonovanGLeeIMHamerMStamatakisE. Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA Int Med. 2017;177(3):335–342.
60.
DingDKolbe-AlexanderTNguyenBKatzmarzykPTPrattMLawsonKD. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(19):1392–1409.
61.
DingDLawsonKDKolbe-AlexanderTL, et al.The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1311–1324.
62.
CarlsonSAFultonJEPrattMYangZAdamsEK. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):315–323.
63.
KullgrenJTWilliamsGCResnicowK, et al.The promise of tailoring incentives for healthy behaviors. Int J Workplace Health Manage. 2016;9(1):2.
64.
DerlyatkaAFomenkoOEckFKhmelevEElliottMT. Bright spots, physical activity investments that work: Sweatcoin: a steps generated virtual currency for sustained physical activity behaviour change. British J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1195.
65.
PatelDNNosselCPatriciosJMaborekeJ. Bright spots, physical activity investments that work: vitality active rewards—a smartphone app that incentivises programme members to be physically active. British J Sports Med. 2018;52(23):1494.
MichieSFixsenDGrimshawJMEcclesMP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):40.
71.
GreenLWGlasgowRE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluat Health Profess. 2006;29(1):126–153.
72.
PettitiD. Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine. Oxford University Press; 1994:115.
73.
IoannidisJPAPatsopoulosNARothsteinHR. Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots. BMJ (Clinical Res Ed). 2008;336(7658):1413–1415.
74.
GreenlandS. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9(1):1–30.
75.
MemonARMasoodTAwanWAWaqasA. The effectiveness of an incentivized physical activity programme (active student) among female medical students in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial. JPMA. 2018;68(10):1438–1445.
76.
GilesELBeckerFTernentLSniehottaFFMcCollEAdamsJ. Acceptability of financial incentives for health behaviours: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157403.
77.
CuellarALoSassoATShahMAtwoodALewis-WallsTR. Wellness programs with financial incentives through disparities lens. Ame J Health Promot. 2018;32(2):355–358.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
