Evaluate impact of physician referral to health coaching on patient engagement and health risk reduction.
Design:
Four-year retrospective, observational cohort study with propensity-matched pair comparisons.
Setting:
Integrated delivery and finance system in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sample:
10 457 adult insured members referred to health coaching by their physician; 37 864 other members identified for health coaching through insurer-initiated outreach.
Intervention:
Practice-based, technology-supported workflow and process for physician prescribing of health coaching during regular office visit, with follow-up on patient’s progress and implementation supports.
Measures:
Patient engagement based on completion of pre-enrollment assessment, formal enrollment in health coaching, completion of required sessions, health risk levels, and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching referral.
Analysis:
Difference-in-difference analysis to assess change in health risk levels and number of health risks pre- and post-health coaching and probability weighting to control for potential confounding between groups.
Results:
Members referred by a physician were significantly more likely to enroll in a health coaching program (21.0% vs 6.0%, P < .001) and complete the program requirements (8.5% vs 2.7%, P < .001) than when referred by insurer-initiated outreach; significant within group improvement in health risk levels from baseline (P < .001) was observed for both the groups.
Conclusions:
Patients are significantly more likely to engage in health coaching when a referral is made by a physician; engagement in health coaching significantly improves health risk levels.
WagnerEH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1(1):2–4.
2.
Center for Advancing Health. A New Definition of Patient Engagement: What Is Engagement and Why Is It Important?Washington, DC: Center for Advancing Health; 2010.
3.
BudzowskiARParkinsonMDSilfeeVJ. An evaluation of lifestyle health coaching programs using trained health coaches and evidence-based curricula at 6 months over 6 years. Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(6):912–915.
WoleverRQMooreMAJordanM. Coaching in healthcare. In: BachkirovaTSpenceGDrakeD, eds. The Sage Handbook of Coaching. 1 ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2017, p. 521–543.
6.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Quality Profiles: The Leadership Series. Focus on Patient Engagement. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2011.
7.
AspyCBMoldJWThompsonDM, et al.Integrating screening and interventions for unhealthy behaviors into primary care practices. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 suppl):S373–380.
8.
CabanaMDRandCSPoweNR, et al.Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–1465.
9.
CifuentesMFernaldDHGreenLA, et al.Prescription for health: changing primary care practice to foster healthy behaviors. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(suppl 2):S4–S11.
10.
CohenDJBalasubramanianBAIsaacsonNFClarkECEtzRSCrabtreeBF. Coordination of health behavior counseling in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(5):406–415.
11.
KristAHWoolfSHFrazierCO, et al.An electronic linkage system for health behavior counseling effect on delivery of the 5A’s. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 suppl):S350–358.
12.
EtzRSCohenDJWoolfSH, et al.Bridging primary care practices and communities to promote healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 suppl):S390–397.
13.
AlexanderSCOstbyeTPollakKIGradisonMBastianLABrouwerRJ. Physicians’ beliefs about discussing obesity: results from focus groups. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21(6):498–500.
14.
LianovLJohnsonM. Physician competencies for prescribing lifestyle medicine. JAMA. 2010;304(2):202–203.
15.
HungDYRundallTGCrabtreeBFTalliaAFCohenDJHalpinHA. Influence of primary care practice and provider attributes on preventive service delivery. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(5):413–422.
16.
HungDYRundallTGTalliaAFCohenDJHalpinHACrabtreeBF. Rethinking prevention in primary care: applying the chronic care model to address health risk behaviors. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):69–91.
17.
ThompsonRS. The prescription for health initiative: some steps on the road to success: what will it take to complete the journey?Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 suppl):S431–433.
ManersRJBakowEParkinsonMDFischerGSCampGR. UPMC prescription for wellness: a quality improvement case study for supporting patient engagement and health behavior change. Am J Med Qual. 2018;33(3):274–282.
22.
BlackmoreCCMecklenburgRSKaplanGS. At Virginia Mason, collaboration among providers, employers, and heath plans to transform care cut costs and improve quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(9):1680–1687.
23.
ChassinR. The Six sigma initiative at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Mt Sinai J Med. 2008;75(1):42–52.
24.
LindermanKSchroederRGZaheerSChooAS. Six sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manage. 2003;21(2):193–203.
25.
ShahRWardPT. Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manage. 2007;25(4):785–805.
26.
RosenbergCNPeelePKeyserDMcAnallenSHolderD. Results from a patient-centered medical home pilot at UPMC Health Plan hold lessons for broader adoption of the model. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(11):2423–2431.
27.
EdingtonDW. Emerging research: a view from one research center. Am J Health Promot. 2001;15(5):341–349.
28.
ByrnesJElliottTValeMJJelinekMVScuffhamP. Coaching patients saves lives and money. Am J Med. 2018;131(4):415–421.e411.
29.
HillBRichardsonBSkouterisH. Do we know how to design effective health coaching interventions: a systematic review of the state of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):e158–168.
30.
XiaoHAdamsSRGolerN, et al.Wellness coaching for people with prediabetes: a randomized encouragement trial to evaluate outreach methods at Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E207.
31.
HuskampHARosenthalMB. Health risk appraisals: how much do they influence employees’ health behavior?Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):1532–1540.
32.
VidrineJISheteSCaoY, et al.Ask-advise-connect: a new approach to smoking treatment delivery in health care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(6):458–464.
33.
ParkinsonMDPeelePBKeyserDJLiuYDoyleS. UPMC my health: managing the health and costs of U.S. healthcare workers. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):403–410.
34.
GoetzelRZAndersonDRWhitmerRWOzminkowskiRJDunnRLWassermanJ.The relationship between modifiable health risks and health care expenditures. An analysis of the multi-employer HERO health risk and cost database. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40(10):843–854.
35.
GoetzelRZPeiXTabriziMJ, et al.Ten modifiable health risk factors are linked to more than one-fifth of employer-employee health care spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(11):2474–2484.
36.
PronkNPGoodmanMJO’ConnorPJMartinsonBC. Relationship between modifiable health risks and short-term health care charges. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2235–2239.
37.
BurtonWNChenCYContiDJSchultzABEdingtonDW. The association between health risk change and presenteeism change. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(3):252–263.
38.
BurtonWNChenCYContiDJSchultzABPranskyGEdingtonDW. The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47(8):769–777.
39.
GoetzelRZCarlsGSWangS, et al.The relationship between modifiable health risk factors and medical expenditures, absenteeism, short-term disability, and presenteeism among employees at Novartis. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(4):487–499.
40.
PronkNPLowryMMaciosekMGallagherJ. The association between health assessment-derived summary health scores and health care costs. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(8):872–878.
41.
YenLSchultzASchnueringerEEdingtonDW. Financial costs due to excess health risks among active employees of a utility company. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(9):896–905.
