Abstract
Professionals interested in advancing best practices in worksite wellness have been calling for more organizational and environmental approaches that will advance a culture of health. We seem to be getting the message across because a recent national survey shows that “supportive social and physical environment” is one of the 5 elements used to define a comprehensive program that has increased the most from 29.2% naming this as part of their approach in 2004 to 56% of companies in 2017. Yet 2 worksite health promotion studies that garnered media attention this past year offer telling examples of what occurs when researchers conflate or confuse the effectiveness of a health education program with a socioecological approach. I would suggest we replace the term “comprehensive programs” with “socioecological approach” or a “culture of health approach” or, at least, “a comprehensive approach,” anything but continued use of the oxymoronic term “comprehensive program.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
