To outline the development, implementation, and evaluation of a multistrategy intervention to promote active transportation, on a large university campus.
Design:
Single group pilot study.
Setting:
A large university in the Northeastern United States.
Participants:
University students (n = 563), faculty and staff (employees, n = 999) were included in the study.
Intervention:
The Active Lions campaign aimed to increase active transportation to campus for all students and employees. The campaign targeted active transport participation through the development of a smartphone application and the implementation of supporting social marketing and social media components.
Measures:
Component-specific measures included app user statistics, social media engagement, and reach of social marketing strategies. Overall evaluation included cross-sectional online surveys preintervention and postintervention of student and employee travel patterns and campaign awareness.
Analysis:
Number of active trips to campus were summed, and the percentage of trips as active was calculated. T tests compared the differences in outcomes from preintervention to postintervention.
Results:
Students had a higher percentage of active trips postintervention (64.2%) than preintervention (49.2%; t = 3.32, P = .001), although there were no differences for employees (7.9% and 8.91%). Greater awareness of Active Lions was associated with greater active travel.
Conclusion:
This multistrategy approach to increase active transportation on a college campus provided insight on the process of developing and implementing a campaign with the potential for impacting health behaviors among campus members.
PucherJBuehlerRBassettDRDannenbergAL. Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1986–1992.
2.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
3.
MartinAGoryakinYSuhrckeM. Does active commuting improve psychological wellbeing? Longitudinal evidence from eighteen waves of the British Household Panel Survey. Prev Med. 2014;69:296–303.
4.
HamerMChidaY. Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(1):9–13.
5.
FurieGLDesaiMM. Active transportation and cardiovascular disease risk factors in U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):621–628.
6.
LindstromM. Means of transportation to work and overweight and obesity: a population-based study in southern Sweden. Prev Med. 2008;46(1):22–28.
7.
SugiyamaTMeromDReevesMLeslieEOwenN. Habitual active transport moderates the association of TV viewing time with body mass index. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(1):11–16.
8.
BassettDRJrPucherJBuehlerRThompsonDLCrouterSE. Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(6):795–814.
9.
AndersenLBSchnohrPSchrollMHeinHO. All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1621–1628.
10.
WhitfieldGPPaulPWendelAM. Active transportation surveillance—United States, 1999-2012. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015;64(7):1–17.
11.
PucherJBuehlerRMeromDBaumanA. Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(suppl 1):S310–S317.
12.
NorwoodPEberthBFarrarSAnableJLudbrookA. Active travel intervention and physical activity behaviour: an evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2014;113:50–58.
13.
KeallMChapmanRHowden-ChapmanPWittenKAbrahamseWWoodwardA. Increasing active travel: results of a quasi-experimental study of an intervention to encourage walking and cycling. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(12):1184–1190.
14.
ChapmanRHowden-ChapmanPKeallM. Increasing active travel: aims, methods and baseline measures of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:935.
15.
ToQGChenTTMagnussenCGToKG. Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(6):e113–e123.
16.
WongJYGilsonNDvan UffelenJGBrownWJ. The effects of workplace physical activity interventions in men: a systematic review. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(4):303–313.
17.
MalikSHBlakeHSuggsLS. A systematic review of workplace health promotion interventions for increasing physical activity. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(1):149–180.
18.
ReedJLPrinceSAColeCA. Workplace physical activity interventions and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity levels among working-age women: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2014;3:147.
19.
LaineJKuvaja-KollnerVPietilaEKoivunevaMValtonenHKankaanpaaE. Cost-effectiveness of population-level physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2014;29(2):71–80.
20.
ArnottBRehackovaLErringtonLSniehottaFFRobertsJAraujo-SoaresV. Efficacy of behavioural interventions for transport behaviour change: systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention coding. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:133.
21.
PetrunoffNRisselCMing WenLBindonJ. We need more active travel intervention research—why not travel plans?Health Promot J Austr. 2014;25(3):209–210.
22.
BoppMKaczynskiATWittmanP. Active commuting patterns at a large, midwestern college campus. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(7):605–611.
23.
SissonSBMcClainJJTudor-LockeC. Campus walkability, pedometer-determined steps, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: a comparison of 2 university campuses. J Am Coll Health. 2008;56(5):585–592.
24.
SissonSBTudor-LockeC. Comparison of cyclists’ and motorists’ utilitarian physical activity at an urban university. Prev Med. 2008;46(1):77–79.
25.
PeacheyAABallerSL. Perceived built environment characteristics of on-campus and off-campus neighborhoods associated with physical activity of college students. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(5):337–342.
26.
BoppMBoppCSchuchertM. Active transportation to and on campus is associated with objectively measured fitness outcomes among college students. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(3):418–423.
27.
PanterJGriffinSDaltonAMOgilvieD. Patterns and predictors of changes in active commuting over 12 months. Prev Med. 2013;57(6):776–784.
28.
PanterJRJonesA. Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don’t we know?J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(4):551–561.
29.
BoppMKaczynskiATBesenyiG. Active commuting influences among adults. Prev Med. 2012;54(3-4):237–241.
30.
KaczynskiATBoppMWittmanP. To drive or not to drive: factors differentiating active versus non-active commuters. Health Behav Public Health. 2012;2(2):14–19.
31.
GrasserGVan DyckDTitzeSStroneggerW. Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review. Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):615–625.
32.
BeenackersMAKamphuisCBGiskesK. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:116.
33.
de NazelleANieuwenhuijsenMJAntoJM. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011;37(4):766–777.
34.
SaelensBESallisJFFrankLD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(2):80–91.
35.
SmallMBailey-DavisLMorganNMaggsJ. Changes in eating and physical activity behaviors across seven semesters of college: living on or off campus matters. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(4):435–441.
36.
KeatingXDGuanJPineroJCBridgesDM. A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2005;54(2):116–125.
BanduraA. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
42.
ProchaskaJJReddingCAEversKE. Transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass; 2002:583.
43.
BoppMBehrensTKVelecinaR. Associations of weight status, social factors and active travel among college students. Am J Health Educ. 2014;45(6):358–367.
44.
BoppMKaczynskiATCampbellME. Social ecological influences on work-related active commuting among adults. Am J Health Behav. 2013;37(4):543–554.
45.
BoppMSimsDRovniakLMatthewsSAPooleEColganJ. There’s an app for that: development of a smartphone app to promote active travel to a college campus. J Transp Health. 2016;3(3):305–314.
46.
StoreyJDSaffitzGBRimonJG. Social marketing. In: GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:435–464.
47.
WilsonDBoppMColganJ. A social media campaign for promoting active travel to a university campus. J Healthc Commun. 2016;1(2):11.
48.
BoppMSimsDColganJRovniakLMatthewsSAPooleE. An examination of workplace influences on active commuting in a sample of university employees. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(4):387–391.
49.
RyusPFergusonELaustenKM. Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program; 2014.
50.
BangorAKortumPMillerJ. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114–123.
51.
DzewaltowskiDAGlasgowREKlesgesLMEstabrooksPABrockE. RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004;28(2):75–80.
52.
GlasgowREVogtTMBolesSM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327.
53.
DugdillLBrettleAHulmeCMcCluskeySLongAT. Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2008;1(1):20–40.
54.
KaczynskiATBoppMJWittmanP. Association of workplace supports with active commuting. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A127.
55.
CampbellMEBoppM. An examination of the relationship of interpersonal influences with walking and biking to work. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19(6):521–524.
56.
OgilvieDGriffinSJonesA. Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:703.
57.
SteinackerA. The economic effect of urban colleges on their surrounding communities. Urban Stud. 2005;42(7):1161–1175.
58.
GumprechtB. The American college town. Geogr Rev. 2003;93(1):51–80.
59.
McKenzieB. Modes less traveled—bicycling and walking to work in the United States: 2008-2012. In: US Census Bureau, ed. American Community Survey Reports. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration; 2014.
