Stroke Rehabilitation Research: Time to Answer more Specific Questions?

Abstract

References

1. Association AH. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2003 update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2002.

2. Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the united states. Stroke 2003; 34: 2109-2112.

3. Yip JY, Wilber KH, Myrtle RC. The impact of the 1997 balanced budget amendment’s prospective payment system on patient case mix and rehabilitation utilization in skilled nursing. Gerontologist 2002; 42: 653-660.

4. Byl N, Roderick J, Mohamed O, et al. Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 176-191.

5. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996c; 272: 1791-1794.

6. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Usedependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996b; 16: 785-807.

7. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996a; 75: 144-149.

8. Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999.

9. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 1998; 43: 152-170.

10.

10. Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354.

11.

11. Taub E, Wolf SW. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997; 3: 38-61.

12.

12. Wolf S, Lecraw D, Barton L, Jann B. Forced use of hemiplegic extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125-132.

13.

13. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2390-2395.

14.

14. Giuliani C, Purser J, Light K, Genova P. Impairments in arm control in subjects with left and right hemispheric stroke. Neurorehabilitation 1997; 9: 71-87.

15.

15. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. 3rd World Congress on Neurological Rehabilitation 2002; 3: 235-240.

16.

16. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S. Bilateral arm training based on motor control and learning principles improves motor control and function in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. From Basic Motor Control to Functional Recovery 2001; 2: 435-443.

17.

17. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000; 74: 27-55.

18.

18. Fisher BE, Sullivan KJ. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001; 8: 31-44.

19.

19. Macko RF, DeSouza CA, Tretter LD, Silver KHC, Smith GV. Aerobic exercise training reduces the energy expenditure and cardiovascular demand of hemiaffected gait in chronic stroke patients: a preliminary report. Stroke 1997a; 28: 326-330.

20.

20. Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning—implications for physical therapy. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 140-149.

21.

21. Macko RF, Smith GV, Dobrovolny CL, Sorkin JD, Goldberg AP, Silver KH. Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 879-884.

22.

22. Macko R, Smith G, Dobrovolney L, Sorkin J, Goldberg A, Silver K. Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (in press).

23.

23. Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar T, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-2375.

24.

24. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparisons to non-disabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (in press).

25.

25. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Ferraro M, et al. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002; 8: 54-70.

26.

26. Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke 2002; 33: 1589-1594.

27.

27. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 2003; 61(Dec. 9): 160-1607.

28.

28. Thaut M, McIntosh G, Rice R, Prassas S. Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on emg and temporal stride parameters in hemiparetic gait of stroke patients. J Neuro Rehabil 1993: 9-16.

29.

29. Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci 1997; 151: 207-212.

30.

30. Macko RF, Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, et al. Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 394-399.

31.

31. Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 380-386.

32.

32. Zhan S, Ottenbacher KJ. Single subject research designs for disability research. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 1-8.