Special Educators as Secondary Content Teachers: How Justifiable?

Abstract

Although there is substantial variability regionally, in many states special educators are responsible for teaching core content classes to adolescents with mild disabilities. This study examined the degree to which pre-service training institutions value and provide content area background to secondary special educators. States were grouped according to the degree of content instruction provided by public school special educators. Seventy-eight training programs (38 from 13 "content-teaching" states and 40 from 13 "non-content-teaching" states) participated. The results indicated that pre-service training in content areas was minimal in importance and scope, with no differences between the groups. The results also indicated that science and social studies were considered significantly less important than English and mathematics and afforded correspondingly less training exposure. Implications for training and secondary school service delivery are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bulgren, J.A. & Carta, J.J. (1992). Examining instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 182-191.

Carlson, S.A. (1985). The ethical appropriateness of subject-matter tutoring for learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 310-314.

Cawley, J.F. (1994). Science for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 67-71.

Geiger, W.L. (1991). National directory of special education personnel preparation programs. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.

Halpern, A.S. , & Benz, M.R. (1987). A statewide examination of secondary special education for students with mild disabilities: Implications for the high school curriculum . Exceptional Children, 54, 122-129.

Kinder, D. , Bursuck, W. , & Epstein, M. (1992). An evaluation of history textbooks. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 472-491.

Mastropieri, M.A. , & Scruggs, T.E. (1994). Text versus hands-on science curriculum: Implications for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education , 15(2), 72-85.

McKenzie, R.G. (1991). Content area instruction delivered by secondary learning disabilities teachers: A national survey. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 115-122.

Nolet, V. , & Tindal, G. (1993). Special education in content area classes: Development of a model and practical procedures. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 36-38.

10.

Passe, J. , & Beattie, J. (1994). Social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities: A progress report. Remedial and Special Education , 15(4), 227-233.

11.

Patton, J.R. , Polloway, E.A. , & Cronin, M.E. (1987, May/June). Social studies instruction for handicapped students: A review of current practices. The Social Studies , 131-135.

12.

Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-36.

13.

Reynolds, M.C. , Wang, M.C. , & Walberg, H.J. (1992). The knowledge bases for special and general education . Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 6-10, 33.

14.

Scruggs, T.E. , & Mastropieri, M.A. (1993). Current approaches to science education: Implications for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities . Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15-24.

15.

Woodward, J. (1994). The role of models in secondary science instruction . Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 94-104.

16.

Zigmond, N. (1993). Rethinking secondary school programs for students with learning disabilities. In E. L. Meyer , G. A. Vergason , & R. J. Whelen (Eds.), Challenges facing special education (pp. 105-140). Denver: Love.