Some states have generated teacher supply/demand information that will satisfy the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. One purpose of this law is to alleviate the shortage of teachers in the field of special education. Because the supply/demand issues facing special education are closely related to those in general education, accomplishing this goal can impact on the quality of education for all children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barro, S.M. (1992). Models for projecting teacher supply, demand, and quality: An assessment of the state of the art. In E. E. Boe & D. M. Gilford (Eds.), Proceedings of a conference on teacher supply, demand, and quality: Policy issues, models, and databases (pp. 129-209). Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
2.
Bowen, E. (1985). And now, a teacher shortage. Time, July 22, p. 63.
3.
Bowers, R.G. (1991). Ohio Teacher supply and demand. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Board of Education.
4.
Bruno, J.E. (1986). Supply-demand modes of teacher shortage in large urban school districts. Journal of Education Finance, 11(4), 447-459.
5.
Career Opportunities News (March-April 1992). Garrett Park, MD: Garrett Park Press.
6.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1986). Future teachers: Will there be enough good ones ? Change, 18(5), 27-30.
7.
Clark, V., & Clemson, R. (1987). Teacher staffing in urban schools: Beyond the question of supply and demand. Metropolitan Education, 1(4), 1-16.
8.
Coelen, S.P. (1991, February). Data issues in building an educator supply and demand model. Paper presented at the Conference on Elementary-Secondary Education Management Information Systems: State and Local Models for Excellence, Orlando, FL.
9.
Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Science Foundation. (1989). State-by-state indicators of science and mathematics education: Preliminary report. Washington, DC: CCSSO Education Assessment Center.
10.
Department of Higher Education. (1990). TILP and ELEET status report and recommendations. Hartford, CT: Author.
11.
Education of the Handicapped Amendments of 1999, Public Law 101-476, 20 U.S.C. 1400 (1990).
12.
Feistritzer, C.E. (1990). Profile of teachers in the U.S.-1990. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information .
13.
Friedman, S.J., & Lauritzen, P. (1991). A report on the feasibility of conducting an educator supply and demand project for the states served by the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
14.
Friedman, S.J., & Lauritzen, P. (1993, February). Mapping the applications submitted for teaching vacancies. Paper presented at the Conference on Elementary-Secondary education Management Information Systems: State and Local Models for Excellence, Orlando, FL.
15.
Friedman, S.J., & Salinas, M. (1990, April). Assessing the active pool of teachers seeking employment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA .
16.
Geiger, W. (1988). The decline in special education degrees conferred . Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
17.
Gerald, D. & Husser, W. (1991). Projections of educational statistics to 2002 . Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
18.
Grissmer, D., Kerby, S., & Hudson, L. (1991). New and returning teachers in Indiana: Source of supply. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
19.
Goodman, E. (1990). How to solve our teacher shortage. McCalls. September, p. 104-110.
20.
Haberman, M. & Rickards, W. (1990). Urban teachers who quit: Why they leave and what they do. Urban Education. 25, p. 297-303.
21.
Haggstrom, G., Darling-Hammond, L., & Grissmer, D. (1988). Assessing teacher supply and demand. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
22.
Hawley, W.D. (1986). Toward a comprehensive strategy for addressing the teacher shortage. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, p. 712-718.
23.
Hines, P. (1992, January 10). From the armed forces to the teaching force. The Wall Street Journal, A8.
24.
Johnston, K.L. & Adlridge, B.G. (1984). The crisis in science education: What is it? How can we respond? Journal of College Science Teaching. September/October, p. 20-28.
25.
Kennedy, M. (1992). Models for projecting teacher supply, demand, and quality: An assessment of the state of the art. In E. E. Boe and D. M. Gilford (Eds.), Proceedings of a conference on teacher supply, demand, and quality: Policy issues, models, and databases (p. 65-108). Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.
26.
King-Sears, M., Rosenberg, M., Ray, R., & Fagen, S. (1992). A partnership to alleviate special education teacher shortages: University and public school collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, p. 9-17.
27.
Landsmann, L. (1985) [Interview with A. E. Wise of Rand Corporation's Center or the Study of the Teaching Profession] .Instructor , 94 (7), p. 70-72, 75.
28.
Lauritzen, P. (1990). Wisconsin teacher supply and demand: An examination of trends. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
29.
Lauritzen, P. & Friedman, S.J. (1991a). Teachers for children with emotional/behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure , 35(2), p. 11-15.
30.
Lauritzen, P. & Friedman, S.J. (1991b). Wisconsin teacher supply and demand: An examination of trends. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
31.
Lauritzen, P. & Friedman, S.J. (1992). Wisconsin teacher supply and demand: An examination of trends. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
32.
Lauritzen, P. & Friedman, S.J. (1993). Supply and demand of educational personnel: An examination of data trends. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
33.
Levin, H.M. (1985). Solving the shortage of mathematics and science teachers. Educational Evolution and Policy Analysis, 7, p. 371-382.
34.
Loosle, D.K., & Friend, M.L. (1991). Teacher supply and demand in Idaho. Boise, ID: Department of Education-State of Idaho.
35.
Moody, A.C. & Christoff, D. (1993). A study of U. S. teacher supply and demand. ASCUS research report: Teacher supply and demand in the United States, 1992 report . Evanston, IL: Association for School, College, and University Staffing, Inc.
36.
National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 1988). Schools and staffing survey. 1987-1988. Unpublished report . Jeffersonville, IN: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census Current Projects Branch.
37.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (1991b). Federal register, 56(250). Washington, DC: United States Office of Education.
38.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (1991a). Thirteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: United States Office of Education.
39.
Prowda, P. (1988). Teacher supply and demand in Connecticut: A second look. Hartford, CN: Connecticut Board of Education.
40.
Reach for the power-Teach. (1991). Cambridge. MA: Recruiting New Teachers. (Available from Recruiting New Teachers, 6 Standish Street, Cambridge, MA.)
41.
Salholz, E. (1985). Help wanted: Teachers. News-week , September 9, p. 99.
42.
Singer, J.D. (1993). Are special educators' career paths special: Results from a 13-year longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 59, p. 262-279.
43.
Smith-Davis, J. (1990). Personnel supply and demand. Proceedings of the College/University Forum (pp. 1-15). Atlanta : Georgia Department of Education.
44.
Smith-Davis, J., & Murray, K. (1991). A resource report on approaches to alleviate personnel shortages in special education. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
45.
Stone, D. (1990). Recruiting for retaining teachers in rural schools . San Francisco: CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
46.
Wilson, J. (1993, February). Surfacing the teacher pipeline: Integrating administrative records over time and agencies in the south. Paper presented at the Conference on ElementarySecondary Education Management Information Systems: State and Local Models for Excellence, Orlando, FL.
