Meaningful professional connections are crucial to enacting inclusive education policy. Yet, extant qualitative research suggests that special education teachers’ (SETs) professional experiences are often marked by isolation, devaluation, and subordination. Informed by homophily theory, in the present study, we extend beyond SETs’ individual experiences to take an organizational perspective. We explore patterns of advice and information seeking, providing, and brokering between general education teachers (GETs) and SETs regarding English language arts (ELA) and mathematics using social network data from 14 elementary schools in one district. Our results suggest that SETs were differently positioned in content area networks, the work necessary to be a part of these networks tended to fall on SETs, and GETs tended to have a slightly greater influence on their ELA networks than SETs. Results have implications for efforts to support and sustain meaningful connections between teachers, a crucial aspect of collaboration for inclusive practice.
BettiniE.MathewsH. M.LillisJ.MeyerK. M.ShaheenT.KalerL.BrunstingN. C. (2021). The roles of teachers in effective inclusive elementary schools. In Handbook of effective inclusive elementary schools (pp. 43–76). Routledge. https://doi.org/nbwx
2.
BettiniE.RodgersW.ScottL. A. (2025). Teacher education and special education editorial vision. Teacher Education and Special Education.
3.
BettiniE.WangJ.CummingM.KimerlingJ.SchutzS. (2019). Special educators’ experiences of roles and responsibilities in self-contained classes for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/ghw3f3
4.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. Sage.
Bridwell-MitchellE. N.CoocN. (2016). The ties that bind: How social capital is forged and forfeited in teacher communities. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/gf7db7
7.
BristolT. J.ShirrellM. (2019). Who is here to help me? The work-related social networks of staff of color in two mid-sized districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 868–898. https://doi.org/gfgn4r
8.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/ggqs9j
CsardiG.NepuszT. (2006). The igraph software. Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9.
11.
DalyA.LiouY.Der-MartirosianC. (2021). A capital idea: Exploring the relationship between capital and student achievement in schools. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 6(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/g6khrv
12.
DemirE. K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 100391. https://doi.org/gkr7jz
13.
EisenmanL. T.PleetA. M.WandryD.McGinleyV. (2011). Voices of special education teachers in an inclusive high school: Redefining Responsibilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 91–104. https://doi.org/cmwb28
14.
ErtugG.BrenneckeJ.KovácsB.ZouT. (2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 38–69. https://doi.org/gj7jw4
15.
GoldhaberD.FalkenG. T.TheobaldR. (2024). What do teacher job postings tell us about school hiring needs and equity?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/p3v5
16.
Gomez-NajarroJ. (2020). An empty seat at the table: Examining general and special education teacher collaboration in response to intervention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/gpj7wk
17.
GreenwayR.McCollowM.HudsonR. F.PeckC.DavisC. A. (2013). Autonomy and accountability: Teacher perspectives on evidence-based practice and decision-making for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 456–468.
18.
GriffinC. C.KilgoreK. L.WinnJ. A.Otis-WilbornA. (2008). First-year special educators’ relationships with their general education colleagues. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 141–157.
19.
HopkinsM.SpillaneJ. P. (2014). Schoolhouse teacher educators: Structuring beginning teachers’ opportunities to learn about instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/f6fvmh
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (2004).
21.
KaffM. S. (2004). Multitasking is multitaxing: Why special educators are leaving the field. Preventing School Failure, 48(2).
22.
KeefeE. B.MooreV. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32, 77–88.
23.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/cppv2k
24.
MahatmyaD.BrownE. L.ValentiM.CeledoniaK. L.SweetT.BetheaC. (2024). Developing social capital through school-based collaborations: A mixed methods social network analysis. Journal of Education Human Resources, 42(3), 354–381. https://doi.org/p3v6
25.
Mason-WilliamsL.BettiniE.Morris MathewsH.BovedaM.RodgersW. (2023). Disparities in teachers’ access to schools’ collective social assets based on role, race, and poverty. Remedial and Special Education, 44(1), 3–15.
26.
MathewsH. M.BillingsleyB.YoungsP. A. (in press). The role of induction and mentoring in the special education workforce. In RockM.BillingsleyB.DiekerL.LekoM. (Eds.), Transforming the special education workforce: Research and complex systems perspectives (book in development). American Educational Research Association.
27.
MathewsH. M.LillisJ.ShaheenT.BettiniE. A. (2023). A systematic review of special educators’ roles: 1997 – 2020. Presentation at the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. Long Beach, CA, United States.
28.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.ReddL. (2014). A case study of a highly effective, inclusive elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/nmfq
29.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/fs9tff
30.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. (2003). Homophily, proximity, and social support theories. In Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/p3v7
31.
Morris MathewsH. M.LillisJ. L.BettiniE.PeytonD. J.PuaD.OblathR.JonesN. D.SmithS. W.SuttonR. (2021). Working conditions and special educators’ reading instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 476–496. https://doi.org/p3v8
32.
NagroS.MarkelzA. M.DavisR. (2020). Every student succeeds act as it applies to special education. In RodriguezJ. A.MurawskiW. W. (Eds.), Special education law and policy: From foundation to application (pp. 157–193). Plural Publishing.
33.
NaraianS. (2010). General, special and. . . inclusive: Refiguring professional identities in a collaboratively taught classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1677–1686. https://doi.org/b9ttrc
34.
PittsV. M.SpillaneJ. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leadership. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(2), 185–207.
35.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
36.
RiceD.ZigmondN. (2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of developments in Australian and American Classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 190–197. https://doi.org/dnz8m6
37.
RonfeldtM.FarmerS. O.McQueenK.GrissomJ. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/fcvs
38.
ScanlonD.BakerD. (2012). An accommodations model for the secondary inclusive classroom. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(4), 212–224.
39.
SpillaneJ. P.HopkinsM.SweetT. M. (2015). Intra-and interschool interactions about instruction: Exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110. https://doi.org/f7z29v
40.
SpillaneJ. P.KimC. M.FrankK. A. (2012). Instructional advice and information providing and receiving behavior in elementary schools: Exploring tie formation as a building block in social capital development. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1112–1145. https://doi.org/gfgtrq
StoughL. M.PalmerD. J. (2003). Special thinking in special settings: A qualitative study of expert special educators. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 206–222. https://doi.org/fqbfnx
43.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/ccn2
44.
WilliamsonP.HoppeyD.McLeskeyJ.BergmannE.MooreH. (2020). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. The Journal of Special Education, 53(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/ggqmr6
45.
YoungsP.JonesN.LowM. (2011). How beginning special and general education elementary teachers negotiate role expectations and access professional resources. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1506–1540. https://doi.org/p3v9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
