Teachers with disabilities serve as role models for students who share their disability identity, offering lived experience as a valuable source of knowledge and representation. The misconceptions about the potential contributions a visual disability affords the field of education not only limit employment opportunities for individuals with visual impairment (VI) in a field with a critical shortage but also deprive students with VI of educators with a shared disability identity who could serve as role models. This qualitative multiple case study used semi-structured interviews to explore the lived experiences of seven adults with VI who pursued careers in the field of visual disabilities education. Findings indicate role modelship impacted all aspects of considering, becoming, and being a Teacher of Students with Visual Impairments (TSVI). Their professional journey was marked by a double bind; they were simultaneously perceived as unqualified due to their disability and dismissed as taking the easy route due to the shared disability identity. TSVIs with VI, however, bring critical lived experience to their teaching, advocacy, and school communities. Breaking the double bind requires collective responsibility across teacher education, policy, and school leadership. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
AccardoA. L.BeanK.CookB.GilliesA.EdgingtonR.KuderS. J.BomgardnerE. M. (2019). College access, success and equity for students on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 4877–4890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04205-8
2.
AstinA. W. (1991). The changing American college student: Implications for educational policy and practice. Higher Education, 22(2), 129–143.
3.
BatemanC. (1996). Full inclusion and main-streaming. CTEVH Journal, 41(3), 44–46.
4.
BettiniE.CormierC. J.RagunathanM.StarkK. (2022). Navigating the double bind: A systematic literature review of the experiences of novice teachers of color in K–12 schools. Review of Educational Research, 92(4), 495–542. https://doi.org/gnqtgt
5.
BogartK. R. (2015). Disability identity predicts lower anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 60(1), 105–109. https://tinyurl.com/489wdkej
6.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/fswdcx
8.
BrinkmannS.KvaleS. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
9.
ColomerS. (2019). Double binds and (re) imagined storylines: Las obligaciones of being a Latina teacher in a new Latinx community. Theory into Practice, 58(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/pw95
CosierM.PearsonH. (2016). Can we talk? The underdeveloped dialogue between teacher education and disability studies. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244015626766. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015626766
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
13.
DootsonS. (1995). An in-depth study of triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(1), 83–187.
14.
DvirN. (2015). Does physical disability affect the construction of professional identity? Narratives of student teachers with physical disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.001
15.
EkelmanB.BazykS.BazykJ. (2013). The relationship between occupational engagement and well-being from the perspective of university students with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(3), 236–252. https://doi.org/gfvt7c
Forber-PrattA. J.MinottiB. J.BurdickC. E.Kate BrownM.HanebuttR. A. (2021). Exploring disability identity with adolescents. Rehabilitation Psychology, 66(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000411
18.
Forber-PrattA. J.ZapeM. P. (2017). Disability identity development model: Voices from the ADA-generation. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.013
19.
GistC. D. (2017). Voices of aspiring teachers of color: Unraveling the double bind in teacher education. Urban Education, 52(8), 927–956. https://doi.org/grnsp2
20.
GrueJ. (2024). The double bind of social legitimacy: On disability, the sick role, and invisible work. Sociology of Health & Illness, 46(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/pr8t
21.
HowleyC. B.HowleyA. (2021). Supply and demand for education personnel serving students with low incidence sensory disabilities in Ohio: A report to the Ohio deans compact [Online Submission]. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED614743.pdf
22.
LewisS.CornA. L.ErinJ. N.HolbrookM. C. (2003). Strategies used by visually impaired teachers of students with visual impairments to manage the visual demands of their professional role. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(3), 157–168.
23.
MaslowA. H. (1962). Some basic propositions of a growth and self-actualization psychology. In MaslowA. (Ed.), Perceiving, behaving, becoming: A new focus for education (pp. 34–49). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED096575.pdf#page=42
24.
MertonR. K. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 106–120.
25.
MuellerC. O. (2021). “I didn’t know people with disabilities could grow up to be adults”: Disability history, curriculum, and identity in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406421996069
26.
Nario-RedmondM. R. (2010). Cultural stereotypes of disabled and non-disabled men and women: Consensus for global category representations and diagnostic domains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X468411
27.
NecaP.BorgesM. L.PintoP. C. (2022). Teachers with disabilities: A literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(12), 1192–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1776779
28.
NicholsS. N. (2022). The impact of social and emotional learning on the retention of students with learning disabilities: A qualitative revelatory holistic case study [Doctoral dissertation]. Regent University.
29.
NusbaumE. A.SteinbornM. L. (2019). A “visibilizing” project: “Seeing” the ontological erasure of disability in teacher education and social studies curricula. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v34i1.764
30.
ParkerE. C.DravesT. J. (2017). A Narrative of two preservice music teachers with visual impairment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/gk4rtp
31.
PerryS. (2017). The stigma of disability in the workplace: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 47(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-170898
32.
QR Collective, BanksJ.GonzálezT.MuellerC.PachecoM.ScottL. A.TrainorA. A. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106
33.
RowlandM. P.BellE. C. (2012). Measuring the attitudes of sighted college students toward blindness. Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research, 2(2), 1–6.
34.
SavaianoM. E.Shanahan BazisP.HebertM.RodgersD. B.BosilevacM.LeutzingerB.ThompsonM. (2022). Estimating the number of teachers of students with visual impairments in the United States. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(5), 724–728. https://doi.org/mzc9
35.
SchlesR. A.LowJ.JohannsG. (2025). Tennessee 2022: Shortages and future needs for TVIs and O&M specialists. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 44(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705251318371
36.
SiegleD. (2023, June19). Open, in vivo, axial, and selective coding [Educational Research Basics]. University of Connecticut. https://tinyurl.com/yhb9a9bk
37.
SpunginS. J.FerrellK. A. (2007). The role and function of the teacher of students with visual impairments [Position Paper]. Division on Visual Impairments, Council for Exceptional Children.
38.
StEvensC. (2022). The lived experience of autistic teachers: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(9), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2041738
39.
StrimelM.NagroS. A.BakerP.ThomaC. (2023). The Experiences of teacher candidates with disabilities: A systematic literature review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231170573
40.
TellesJ. A. (2000). Biographical connections: Experiences as sources of legitimate knowledge in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050019668
41.
TyrellI.GriffinJ. (2013). The human givens: A new approach to emotional health and clear thinking. Human Givens Publishing.
42.
WilcockA. A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Slack.
43.
WilloughbyD. M.DuffyS. L. M. (1989). Handbook for itinerant and resource teachers of the blind and visually impaired. National Federation of the Blind.
44.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
