Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Given recent increased attention to teacher evaluation, it is imperative to understand the expertise teachers need to educate students with severe disabilities. In this grounded theory study, the authors interviewed nine special education faculty who specialize in severe disabilities about the job-related skills and qualities exhibited by expert teachers of students with severe disabilities. The results indicate that in addition to systematic and student-centered instruction, expert teachers of students with severe disabilities are guided by a set of non-negotiable principles regarding inclusion and the dignity and value of students with severe disabilities. Implications for teacher preparation and evaluation are discussed.

Keywords

teachers special education severe disabilities teacher expertise

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

K. M.

Lowrey

K. A.

Douglas

K. H.

Sievers

(2011). I can identify Saturn but I can’t brush my teeth: What happens when the curricular focus for students with severe disabilities shifts. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 11-21.

Benedict

A. E.

Thomas

R. A.

Kimerling

Leko

(2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: What every special education teacher should know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 60-68.

Bereiter

Scardamalia

(1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

Berliner

D. C.

(1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-13. doi:10.31012/0013189X015007007

Berliner

D. C.

(1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In Mangieri

J. N.

Block

C. C.

(Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161-186). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

Berliner

D. C.

(2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology, & Society, 24, 200-212. doi:10.1177/0270467604265535

Bishop

A. G.

Brownell

M. T.

Klingner

J. K.

Leko

M. M.

Galman

A. C.

(2010). Differences in beginning special education teachers: The influence of personal attributes, preparation, and school environment on classroom reading practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 75-92.

Blanton

L. P.

Sindelar

P. T.

Correa

V. I.

(2006). Models and measures of beginning teacher quality. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 115-127. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020201

Bouck

E. C.

(2012). Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability: Considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1175-1186. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01517.x

10.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205

11.

Brownell

M. T.

Adams

Sindelar

Waldron

Vanhover

(2006). Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities. Exceptional Children, 72, 169-185. doi:10.1177/001440290607200203

12.

Burns

M. K.

Ysseldyke

J. E.

(2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11. doi:10.1177/0022466908315563

13.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

S. C.

(2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71-82. doi:10.1177/0022466911420877

15.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2013). Draft initial and advanced specialty sets. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/Standards/Special-Educator-Professional-Preparation/CEC-Initial-and-Advanced-Specialty-Sets

16.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Darling-Hammond

(2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8,1-44.

18.

Dingle

M. P.

Brownell

M. T.

Leko

M. M.

Boardman

A. G.

Haager

(2011). Developing effective special education reading teachers: The influence of professional development, context, and individual qualities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 87-103.

19.

Dreyfus

H. L.

(1984). What expert systems can’t do. Raritan, 48, 22-36.

20.

Holdheide

L. R.

Goe

Croft

Reschly

D. J.

(2010). Challenges in evaluating special education teachers and English language learners specialists (TQ Research & Policy Brief). Washington, DC: National Compre-hensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrived from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/July2010Brief.pdf

21.

Jackson

Ryndak

D. L.

Billingsley

(2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate to severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 129-141. doi:10.2511/rpsd.25.3.129

22.

Kavale

K. A.

Foorness

S. R.

(2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In Gersten

Schiller

E. P.

Vaughn

(Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Synthesis of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

Leko

M. M.

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Murphy

(2012). Promoting special education preservice expertise. Focus on Exceptional Children, 7, 1-17.

24.

Rainforth

York

McDonald

(1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

25.

Robb

S. M.

Smith

D. D.

Montrosse

B. E.

(2012). The context of the demand for special education faculty: A study of special education teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 128-139. doi:10.1177/0888406412444760

26.

Roberts

C. A.

(2013). Identity development of literacy teachers of adolescents with significant cognitive disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3588529)

27.

Ryndak

D. L.

Clark

Conroy

Stewart

(2001). Preparing teachers to meet the needs of students with severe disabilities: Program configuration and expertise. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 96-105. doi:10.2511/rpsd.26.2.96

28.

Saldaña

(2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

29.

Slavin

R. E.

(2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31, 15-21. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007015

30.

Smith

T. W.

Strahan

(2004). Toward a prototype of expertise in teaching: A descriptive case study. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 357-371. doi:10.1177/0022487104267587

31.

Stough

L. M.

Palmer

D. J.

(2003). Special thinking in special settings: A qualitative study of expert special educators. Journal of Special Education, 36, 206-222. doi:10.1177/002246690303600402

32.

Stumbo

McWalters

(2011). Measuring effectiveness: What will it take? Educational Leadership, 68, 10-15.

33.

Tsui

A. B.

(2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 421-439. doi:10.1080/13540600903057179

34.

Wright

P. S.

Horn

S. P.

Sanders

W. L.

(1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67. doi:10.1023/A:1007999204543

Faculty Perceptions of Expertise Among Teachers of Students With Severe Disabilities

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References