The field of early childhood special education continues to be dominated by deficit-based perspectives of young disabled children. In contrast, Descriptive Inquiry supports educators to see children as multifaceted and full of strengths, promoting the democratic aim of schooling to nurture individual human flourishing for the good of society. Through a qualitative discourse analysis, we explore how 36 graduate students applied Descriptive Inquiry to their work with young disabled children. We highlight four cases of graduate students and their focus children in this article. Our findings indicate that Descriptive Inquiry can serve an important means of advancing democracy for young disabled children. We recommend that early childhood special education teacher educators consider incorporating Descriptive Inquiry into their programs if they hope to instill democratic dispositions in their teacher candidates.
AndersenC. S. (2022). Recognition and capability—Prerequisites for empowerment for children with disabilities?Child Indicators Research, 15(3), 1363–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-022-09925-5
2.
AndersonD. H.MarchantM.SomarribaN. Y. (2010). Behaviorism works in special education. In ObiakorF. E.BakkenJ. P.RotatoriA. F. (Eds.), Current issues and trends in special education: Identification, assessment and instruction advances in special education (Vol. 19; pp. 157–173). Emerald Group Publishing.
AnnammaS. A.BoeléA. L.MooreB. A.KlingnerJ. (2013). Challenging the ideology of normal in schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(12), 1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.802379
BrownL. X. Z.AshkenazyE.Giwa OnaiwuM. (Eds.). (2017). All of the weight of our dreams: On living racialized autism. DragonBee Press.
7.
BulloughR. V. (2021). A musing on our times: Democracy as a way of life, conspiracy theories, and Dewey’s conception of growth as the aim of education. Educational Studies, 57(6), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1919678
8.
BulloughR. V. (2023). Rethinking dispositions in teaching and teacher education: Virtue and the manners of democracy as a way of life. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231154900
9.
CariniP. G.HimleyM. (2010). Jenny’s story: Taking the long view of the child. Teachers College Press.
10.
Cochran-SmithM.Dudley-MarlingC. (2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112446512
11.
DarawshehW. (2014). Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigor, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560–568. https://doi/org/10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560
12.
DevecchiC.RoseR.ShevlinM. (2014). Education and the capabilities of children with special needs. In Sarojini-HartC.BiggeriM.BabicB. (Eds.), Agency and participation in childhood and youth: International applications of the capability approach in schools and beyond (pp. 145–162). Bloomsbury.
13.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan Publishing.
14.
EboB. A. (2018). Constructivism or behaviorism: What is the best method to teach special needs students?Journal of Healthcare, Science and the Humanities, 8(2), 24–56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930485/
15.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
16.
EnnisR. P.BlantonK.KatsiyannisA. (2017). Child find activities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Recent case law. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(5), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685063
17.
FlewittR.NindM.PaylerJ. (2009). “If she’s left with books she’ll just eat them”: Considering inclusive multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105587
18.
FranklinA.SloperP. (2009). Supporting the participation of disabled children and young people in decision-making. Children & Society, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00131.x
19.
FurmanC. E.TraughC. E. (2021). Descriptive inquiry in teacher practice: Cultivating practical wisdom to create democratic schools. Teachers College Press.
20.
GardinerF. (2017). First hand perspectives on behavioral interventions for autistic people and people with other developmental disabilities. The Autistic Self Advocacy Network, University of California, Regents of University of California.
21.
GoodleyD.Runswick-ColeK. (2010). Emancipating play: Dis/abled children, development and deconstruction. Disability & Society, 25(4), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003755914
22.
GrantC. (2020). Special education by zip code: Creating equitable child find policies. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 52(1), 127–178. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol52/iss1/6
23.
HimleyM.CariniP. F. (2000). From another angle: Children’s strengths and school standards. Teachers College Press.
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Impro-vement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004)
25.
JohnstoneB. (2018). Discourse analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley.
26.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
27.
Kasa-HenricksonC. (2005). “There’s no way this kid’s retarded”: Teachers’ optimistic constructions of students’ ability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360311042000253591
28.
KleekampM. C. (2024). What about the 1%? Transforming current literacy pedagogy for students with significant support needs. Language Arts, 101(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.58680/la202432764
LeeperR. (2024). “At least I was allowed to play how I wanted”: From correcting autistic behaviors to celebrating autistic play. The Critical Social Educator, 2(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.70707/ncsk11241d
Martínez-ÁlvarezP.ChiangH. (2020). A bilingual special education teacher preparation program in New York City: Case studies of teacher candidates’ student teaching experiences. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(1–2), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1749186
33.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
34.
MulderJ.CarterS.GrafM. (2019). The right to play for children with disabilities. Canadian Journal of Children’s Rights, 6(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.22215/cjcr.v6i1.2189
35.
NobelM. M. (2022). Challenging deficit thinking in our schools: It starts during educator preparation. In WilliamsR. D. (Ed.), Handbook of research on challenging deficit thinking for exceptional education improvement (pp. 27–64). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8860-4.ch002
36.
PalaganasE. C.SanchezM. E.MolintasM. V. P.CaricativoR. D. (2017). Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. The Qualitative Report, 22(2), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552
Rappolt-SchlichtmannG.BoucherA. R.EvansM. (2018). From deficit remediation to capacity building: Learning to enable rather than disable students with dyslexia. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 864–874. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0031
40.
Sandoval-NortonA. H.ShkedyG.ShkedyD. (2019). How much compliance is too much compliance: Is long-term ABA therapy abuse?Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1641258. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1641258
ShapiroB. J.DerringtonT. M. (2004). Equity and disparity in access to services: An outcomes-based evaluation of early intervention child find in Hawaii. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214040240040201
43.
ShumeT. J. (2020). Conceptualising disability: A critical discourse analysis of a teacher education textbook. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1839796
44.
StermanJ. J.NaughtonG. A.BuncyA. C.FroundeE.VilleneuveM. A. (2020). Is play a choice? Application of the capabilities approach to children with disabilities on the school playground. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 579-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1472819
45.
ThoriusK. A. K. (2016). Stimulating tensions in special education teachers’ figured world: An approach toward inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(12), 1326–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1168877
46.
ThoriusK. A. K.MooreT. S.CoomerM. N. (2019). We can do better: Critically reframing special education research and practice at the intersections of disability and cultural and linguistic diversity for young children. Advances in Special Education, 34, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-401320190000034010
Wiley-MydskeL. (2017). Change the world, not your child. In BallouE. P.ThomasK.DaVanportS. (Eds.), What autistic girls wish their parents knew (pp. 55–59). DragonBee.
49.
XerriD. (2018). Two methodological challenges for teacher-researchers: Reflexivity and trustworthiness. The Clearing House, 91(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1371549
50.
YellM. L.RogersD.RogersE. L. (1998). The legal history of special education: What a long, strange trip it’s been!Remedial and Special Education, 19(4), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259801900405
51.
YergeauM. (2018). Authoring autism. Duke University Press.
52.
ZirkelP. A. (2015). Special education law: Illustr-ative basics and nuances of key IDEA components. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(4), 263–275. https://doi/prg/10.1177/0888406415575377
