Special educators assume an essential leadership role in school-wide multilayered instructional systems for teaching culturally and linguistically diverse learners with and without disabilities, including learners at risk of being inappropriately referred for special education. Research findings from a model demonstration project are presented informing research to practice in the (a) development of partnerships, (b) delivery of effective professional development, and (c) framing of cultural and linguistic responsive teaching to improve instruction for English learners (ELs) in Grades K-3 in elementary schools in a rural community. Content, skill sets, and tools to include in educator training for general and special educators who teach English language and other diverse learners are recommended based on project findings.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (2008). Developing reading and writing in second-language learners: Lessons from the report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BaumgartnerL. M. (2001). An update on transformational learning. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 89, 15-24.
3.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). The bioecological theory of human development. In BronfenbrennerU. (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CloudN.GeneseeF.HamayanE. (2009). Literacy instruction for English language learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6.
Colorado Department of Education (n.d.). Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/mtss
7.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2015). Promises to keep: Transforming educator preparation to better serve a diverse range of learners. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
CramerL. (2015). Inequities of intervention among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 12(1). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056724.pdf
9.
CrantonP. (2002). Teaching for transformation. In Ross-GordonJ. M. (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education: No. 93. Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively (pp. 63-71). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CrantonP. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Darling-HammondL.RichardsonN. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters?Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
12.
Developmental Reading Assessment, Second Edition (DRA-2). Boston, MA: Pearson
13.
DickersonG. E. (2001). The institutionalization of educational reform: Sustaining an effective educational program. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute/State University.
14.
DuBoisE. A. (2017). The voices of special educators: How do special educators teach English language learners who are receiving special education services? (Dissertations and Theses Paper No. 3638). Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/3638/
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
16.
GayG. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 613-629.
17.
GonzálezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
HooverJ. J. (2016). Data-driven decision making in a multi-tiered model. In HooverJ. J.BacaL.KlingnerJ. K. (Eds.), Why do English language learners struggle with reading? Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities (pp. 141-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
HooverJ. J.BacaL. M.KlingnerJ. K. (2016). Why do English learners struggle with reading? Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
20.
HooverJ. J.BarlettaL. M.KlingnerJ. K. (2016). Multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) and English learners. In HooverJ. J.BacaL.KlingnerJ. K. (Eds.), Why do English learners struggle with reading? Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 25-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21.
HooverJ. J.EricksonJ. (2015). Culturally responsive special education referrals of English learners in one rural county school district: Pilot project. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34, 18-28.
22.
HooverJ. J.KlingnerJ. (2011). Promoting cultural validity in the assessment of bilingual special education students. In BasterraM.TrumbullE.Solano-FloresG. (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 143-167). New York, NY: Routledge.
HooverJ. J.PattonJ. R. (2017). IEPs for ELs: And other diverse learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
HooverJ. J.Soltero-GonzalezL. (2014, April11). Examination of teaching abilities in the delivery of multilevel literacy instruction to ELs. Presentation at the Council for Exceptional Children Convention, Philadelphia, PA.
26.
JohnsonK.HayesC.CenterH.DaleyC. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 135-149.
27.
KlingnerJ. K.EdwardsP. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108-117.
28.
KlingnerJ. K.Soltero-GonzalezL.LesauxN. (2010). Response to intervention for English language learners. In LipsonM.WixsonK. (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K-12 literacy (pp. 134-162). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29.
KrugerT.DaviesA.EckersleyB.NewellF.CherednichenkoB. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Canberra, Australia: Victoria University.
30.
MaheadyL.MagieraK.SimmonsR. (2016). Building and sustaining school-university partnerships in rural settings: One approach for improving special education service delivery. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(2), 33-40.
31.
MerriamS. B. (2011). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 89, 3-14.
32.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.
33.
OroscoM. J.KlingnerJ. (2010). One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: “Referring into RTI.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 269-288.
34.
OrtizA. A.RobertsonP. M.WilkinsonC. Y.LiuY.McGheeB. D.KushnerM. I. (2011). The role of bilingual education teachers in preventing inappropriate referrals of ELLs to special education: Implications for response to intervention. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 316-333. doi:10.1080/15235882.2011.628608
35.
QuickH. E.HoltzmanD. J.ChaneyK. R. (2009). Professional development and instructional practice: Conceptions and evidence of effectiveness. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14, 45-71.
RobinsonG. R.BursuckW. D.SinclairK. D. (2013). Implementing RTI in two rural elementary schools: Encouraging beginnings and challenges for the future. Rural Educator, 34, 1-9.
StewartC. (2014). Transforming professional development to professional learning. Journal of Adult Education, 43 (1), 28-33.
40.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Basics of qualitative researchThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
TharpR. G.DohertyR. W.EchevarriaJ.EstradaP.GoldenbergC.HilbergR. S. (2004). Five standards for effective pedagogy and student outcomes (No. G1). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.
43.
VaughnS. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes?Paper Presented at the National Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-interventions Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
