Content Acquisition Podcasts for Teachers (CAP-T) are a form of multimedia-based instruction that are supported by an empirical record of effectiveness and are grounded in Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning and accompanying instructional design principles. In this study, 162 students enrolled in an introductory course in special education were assigned to watch CAP-Ts for a variety of topics throughout the semester. Students tracked their viewings per CAP-T and self-reported the number of views during the midterm and final examinations. Researchers included clusters of questions coded to each CAP-T on the exams. Linear regression was used to predict student performance on each cluster of questions based on the number of CAP-T viewings. Results show a positive, predictive relationship between CAP-T views and performance on midterm and final exam questions overall, but some unexpected findings emerged when looking at individual subcomponents of the assessments.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
BlantonL. P.McLeskeyJ.Hernandez-TaylorK. (2014). Examining indicators of teacher education program quality: Intersections between general and special education. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 129-142). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BransfordJ. D.SchwartzD. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
4.
BrownellM. T.BishopA. G.KlingnerJ. K.PenfieldR. D.DiminoJ.HaagerD.. . . SindelarP. T. (2009). The role of domain expertise in beginning special education teacher quality. Exceptional Children, 75, 391-411.
5.
BrownellM. T.GriffinC.LekoM. M.StephensJ. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: Creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 235-249. doi:10.1177/0888406411404570
6.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.
7.
BullG.FersterB.KjellstromW. (2012). Inventing the flipped classroom. Learning & Leading With Technology, 40(1), 10-11.
8.
CarlisleA. A.ThomasC. N.McCathrenR. B. (2016). The effectiveness of using a content acquisition podcast to teach phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and phonics to preservice special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 1-12. doi:10.1177/0162643416651723
9.
ChanD. (2009). So why ask me? Are self report data really that bad? In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in organizational and social sciences (pp. 309-335). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
DiekerL. A.KennedyM. J.SmithS.VasquezE.IIIRockM.ThomasC. N. (2014). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers (Document No. IC-11). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
12.
DriverM. K.PullenP. C.KennedyM. J.WilliamsM. C.ElyE. (2014). Using instructional technology to improve preservice teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37, 309-329. doi:10.1177/0888406414537902
13.
ElyE.KennedyM. J.PullenP.WilliamsM. C.HirschS. E. (2014). Improving instruction of future teachers: A multimedia approach that supports implementation of evidence-based vocabulary practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 35-43. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.012
14.
ElyE.PullenP.KennedyM. J.HirschS. E.WilliamsM. C. (2014). Use of instructional technology to improve preservice teacher knowledge of vocabulary instruction. Computers & Education, 75, 44-52. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.013
15.
ElyE.PullenP.KennedyM. J.WilliamsM. C. (2015). Using multimedia to improve evidence-based vocabulary instruction in elementary classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 59-72.
16.
EvansC. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50, 491-498. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016
17.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184-205.
18.
HartJ. E.MoreC. M. (2013). Investigating the impact of technology on pre-service teacher knowledge of autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 504-513.
19.
HeilesenS. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting?Computers & Education, 55, 1063-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.002
20.
HirschS. E.KennedyM. J.HainesS.ThomasC. N.AlvesK. D. (2015). Improving teacher candidate knowledge and application of functional behavioral assessments using multimedia. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 38-50. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.38
21.
KennedyM. J.AlvesK. D.RodgersW. J. (2015). Innovations in the delivery of content knowledge in special education teacher preparation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51, 73-81. doi: 10.1177/1053451215579268
22.
KennedyM. J.DeshlerD. D.LloydJ. W. (2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 22-38. doi:10.1177/0022219413487406
23.
KennedyM. J.DriverM. K.PullenP. C.ElyE.ColeM. T. (2013). Improving teacher candidates’ knowledge of phonological awareness: A multimedia approach. Computers & Education, 64, 42-51. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.010
24.
KennedyM. J.ElyE.ThomasC. N.PullenP. C.NewtonJ. R.AshworthK.. . . LovelaceS. P. (2012). Using multimedia tools to support teacher candidates’ learning. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 243-257. doi:10.1177/0888406412451158
25.
KennedyM. J.HartJ. E.KellemsR. O. (2011). Using enhanced podcasts to augment limited instructional time in teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 87-105. doi:10.1177/0888406410376203
26.
KennedyM. J.HirschS. E.DillonS. E.RabideauL.AlvesK. D.DriverM. K. (2016). Using multimedia to increase university students’ knowledge and to reduce perceived cognitive load. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 153-158. doi: 10.1177/0098628316636295
27.
KennedyM. J.KellemsR. O.ThomasC. N.NewtonJ. R. (2015). Using content acquisition podcasts to deliver core content to preservice teacher candidates. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 163-168. doi:10.1177/1053451214542046
28.
KennedyM. J.ThomasC. N. (2012). Effects of content acquisition podcasts to develop preservice teachers’ knowledge of positive behavioral interventions and supports. Exceptionality, 20, 1-19. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.611088
29.
KennedyM. J.AroninS.O’NealM.NewtonJ. R.ThomasC. N. (2014). Creating multimedia-based vignettes with embedded evidence-based practices: A tool for supporting struggling learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(4), 15-30.
30.
KennedyM. J.ThomasC. S.AroninS.NewtonJ. R.LloydJ. W. (2014). Improving teacher candidate knowledge using content acquisition podcasts. Computers & Education, 70, 116-127.
31.
KennedyM. J.WagnerD.StegallJ.LembkeE.MiciakJ.AlvesK. D.. . . HirschS. E. (2016). Using content acquisition podcasts to improve teacher candidate knowledge and application of curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 82, 303-320. doi:10.1177/0014402915615885
32.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82, 25-43. doi:10.1177/0014402915598782
33.
Lignugaris/KraftB.HarrisS. (2014). Teacher preparation: Principles of effective pedagogy. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 233-254). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Lignugaris/KraftB.SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.KimerlingJ. (2014). The “wicked question” of teacher education effects and what to do about it. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 461-471). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
MaheadyL.SmithC.JabotM. (2014). Field experiences and instructional pedagogies in teacher education: Don’t know, and must learn soon. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 161-177). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
MayerR. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760-769. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
37.
MayerR. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MayerR. E.DowG.MayerS. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds?Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806-813.
39.
MayerR. E.JacksonJ. (2005). The case for coherence in scientific explanations: Quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 13-18.
40.
MayerR. E.JohnsonC. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 380-386. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380
41.
MayerR. E.MathiasA.WetzellK. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pretraining: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 147-154.
42.
MorenoR.MayerR. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
43.
MorenoR.MayerR. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165-173.
44.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148.
45.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.BovedaM. (2014). Working together: Research on the preparation of general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 143-160). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
ReschlyD. J.HoldheideL. R.BehrstockE.WeberG. (2009). Enhancing teacher preparation, development and support. In GoeL. (Ed.), America’s opportunity: Teacher effectiveness and equity in K-12 classrooms (pp. 41-64). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
47.
SalvucciS.WalterE.ConleyV.FinkS.SabaM. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
48.
SayeskiK. L.Hamilton-JonesB.OhS. (2015). The efficacy of IRIS STAR legacy modules under different instructional conditions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38, 291-305. doi:10.1177/0888406415600770
49.
SayeskiK. L.KennedyM. J.de IralaS.ClintonE.HamelM.ThomasK. (2015). The efficacy of multimedia modules for teaching basic literacy-related concepts. Exceptionality, 23, 237-257. doi:10.1080/09362835.2015.1064414
50.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-21.
51.
SindelarP. T.BrownellM. T.BillingsleyB. (2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 8-24. doi:10.1177/0888406409358593
52.
SmithS. J.KennedyM. J. (2014). Technology and teacher education. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 178-193). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
StullA.MayerR. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 808-820.
54.
U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2012). Digest of education statistics [NCES 2012-001]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64
