In this study, the authors represent an exploratory investigation of current preparation of preservice teachers related to response to intervention (RTI) in institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the Office of Special Education Program (OSEP) Regional Resource and Federal Centers (RRFCs) North Central Region and Pennsylvania. In this study, they use a two-stage sampling process to identify IHEs and their education faculty. A survey was designed by the researchers and administered electronically via email. Three hundred eleven IHEs with 771 preservice education faculty members from their respective states, colleges, and departments were invited to participate in the study. There were 227 usable surveys returned for a 29.4% return rate. The authors found special education faculty indicating high agreement on many items related to preservice preparation to implement RTI. Recommendations for future IHE RTI training to better prepare preservice teacher educators for RTI in local educational settings are included.
BerkeleyS.BenderW. N.PeasterL. G.SaundersL. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 85-95.
2.
BradleyM. C.DaleyT.LevinM.O’ReillyR.ParsadA.RobertsonA.WernerA. (2011). IDEA National Assessment Implementation Study (NCEE 2011-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
3.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.DoolittleJ. (2005). Response to intervention: 1997. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 8-13.
4.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357-377.
5.
The College Blue Book. (2010). Detroit, MI: Gale/Cengage Learning.
6.
DetgenA.YamashitaM.DavisB.WraightS. (2011). State policies and procedures on response to intervention in the Midwest Region (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011-No. 116). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratory Midwest, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520326.pdf
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 95-99.
8.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263-279.
9.
GayL. R.AirasianP. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
GerberM. (2010). Responsiveness that matters. New Times for DLD, 28(2), 1-2, 4.
11.
HooverJ. J.LoveE. (2011). Supporting school-based response to intervention: A practitioner’s model. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(3), 40-48.
12.
HooverJ. J.PattonJ. R. (2008). The role of special educators in a multitiered instructional system. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 195-202.
13.
Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3
O’ConnorR. (March, 2007). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. New Times for DLD, 25(1), 1-2.
19.
PrasseD. P.BreunlinR. J.GirouxD.HuntJ.MorrisonD.ThierK. (2012). Embedding multi-tiered system of supports/response to intervention into teacher preparation. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 10(2), 75-93.
20.
SheehanK. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/
