One of the challenges facing educators who teach students with autism spectrum disorders is implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) with fidelity. One EBP used to help such learners in acquiring targeted behavioral or academic skills is prompting. In this study, the authors examine the efficacy of individualized clinical coaching (ICC) of least-to-most prompting (also referred to as system-of-least prompts [SLP]) in the TLE TeachLivE™ simulationreality teaching and learning environment (TLE). Participants included six novice educators enrolled in a graduate special education course that focused on EBPs for teaching learners with autism. Results suggest that ICC in TLE was effective in increasing the fidelity of implementation of the participants’ use of SLP.
Akmanoglu-UludagN.BatuS. (2005). Teaching naming relatives to individuals with autism using simultaneous prompting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 401-410.
2.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
3.
BillingsleyF.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
4.
BrowderD. M.HudsonM. E.WoodA. L. (2013). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability who are emergent readers to comprehend passages of text. Exceptionality, 21, 191-296.
5.
BrowderD. M.JiminezB. A.MimsP. J.KnightV. F.SpoonerF.LeeA.FlowersC. (2012). The effects of a “tell-show-try-apply” professional development package on teachers of students with severe developmental disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35, 212-227.
6.
BrownellM. T.RossD. D.ColonE. P.McCallumC. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 242-252.
7.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.
8.
BryanL. C.GastD. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high- functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553-567.
9.
CornettJ.KnightJ. (2009). Research on coaching. In KnightJ. (Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 192-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
10.
DiekerL.HynesM.HughesC.SmithE. (2008). Implications of mixed reality and simulation technology on special education and teacher preparation. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40, 1-20.
11.
DiekerL.RodriguezJ.Lignugaris/KraftB.HynesM.HughesC. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37, 21-33.
12.
DohertyI. (2011). Evaluating the impact of professional development on teaching practice: Research findings and future research directions. US-China Education Review, 5, 703-714.
13.
GarlandD. P.Vince GarlandK. M.VasquezE. (2013). Management of classroom behaviors: Perceived readiness of education interns. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13, 133-147.
14.
GastD. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
GreenwoodC. R.MaheadyL. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation?Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 265-275.
HayesA. T.StraubC. L.DiekerL. A.HughesC. E.HynesM. C. (2013). Ludic learning: Exploration of TLE TeachLivE™ and effective teacher training. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 52(2), 23-26.
18.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
19.
HorrocksE. L.MorganR. L. (2011). Effects of inservice teacher training on correct implementation of assessment and instructional procedures for teachers of students with profound multiple disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 283-319.
20.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.JimenezB. (2014). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 60-77.
21.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (1982). Transfer of training: The contribution of “coaching.”Journal of Education, 163, 163-172.
22.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VG: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
KretlowA. G.BartholomewC. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279-299.
25.
LeblancM. P.RicciardiJ. N.LuiselliJ. K. (2005). Improving discrete trial instruction by paraprofessional staff through an abbreviated performance feedback intervention. Education & Treatment of Children, 28, 76-82.
26.
National Professional Development Center (NPDC) on Autism Spectrum Disorders. (2010). Evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Retrieved from http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/
27.
NeitzelJ.WoleryM. (2009). Steps for implementation: Least-to-most prompts. Chapel Hill: National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.
28.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 23-51.
29.
OdomS. L.BoydB.HallL. J.HumeK. (2010). Evaluation of comprehensive treatment models for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 425-436.
30.
ScheelerM.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 396-407.
31.
SimpsonR. L.McKeeM.TeeterD.BeytienA. (2007). Evidence-based methods for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders: Stakeholder issues and perspectives. Exceptionality, 15, 203-217.
32.
StahmerA. C.CollingsN. M.PalinkasL. A. (2005). Early intervention practices for children with autism: Descriptions from community providers. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 66-79.
33.
SuhrheinrichJ. S. (2011). Training teachers to use pivotal response training with children with autism: Coaching as a critical component. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 339-349.
34.
Vince GarlandK.VasquezE.PearlC. (2012). Efficacy of individualized clinical coaching in a virtual reality classroom for increasing teachers’ fidelity of implementation of discrete trial teaching. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 502-513.
35.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.. . .SchultzT. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
