In this exploratory study, the authors examine Greek special education teachers’ individual and collaborative teaching experiences in the context of their literacy instruction. The Five Foci Framework, situated in Vygotskian theory, is utilized in the study’s design to examine special education teachers’ individual and collaborative experiences teaching and included personal situated inquiry, critical collaborative inquiry, improved learning, transparent research process, and knowledge generation and presentation. Twenty-five special education teachers in northwestern Greece participate in the study. Data include individual semi-structured interviews, researchers’ analytical memoing and dialogue, and inter-rater coding. Data are independently analyzed and result in the following themes: inquiries and goals, stories of collaboration, assessment, and challenges and needs. The authors offer suggestions for enacting co-teaching within the structures of national standards through collaborative self-study.
ArgyropoulosV.NikolaraiziM. (2009). Developing inclusive practices through collaborative action research. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 139-153.
2.
AustinV. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245-255.
3.
AvramidisE.BaylissP.BurdenR. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20, 191-211.
4.
AvramidisE.NorwichB. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129-147.
5.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
6.
BoutskouE. (2007). The role of special education teachers in primary schools in Greece. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17, 289-302.
7.
BrownellM.GriffinC.LekoM.StephensJ. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: Creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 235-249.
8.
BulloughR. V.Jr.PinnegarS. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30, 13-21.
9.
CookL.FriendM. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
10.
CookL.FriendM. (2010). The state of the art collaboration on behalf of students with disabilities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 1-8.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Department for Education and Employment. (2001). The national literacy strategy. London, England: Author.
13.
FeldmanA. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26-28.
14.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChamberlainD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 9-27.
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2005). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 14-20.
HamiltonM. L.PinnegarS. (1998). Conclusion. In HamiltonM. L.PinnegarS.RussellT.LoughranJ.LaBoskeyV. K. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 235-246). London, England: Falmer Press.
19.
HartmannE. (2009). Conceptualizing collaboration: How teachers work together to support children with deafblindness (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession Order No. 3383600)
20.
LaBoskeyV. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In LoughranJ. J.HamiltonM. L.LaBoskeyV. K.RussellT. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 817-869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LoughranJ. J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 12-20.
23.
LoughranJ. J.NorthfieldJ. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In HamiltonM. L. (with PinnegarS.RussellT.LoughranJ.LaBoskeyV. K.) (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7-18). London, England: Falmer.
24.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ.NorlandJ.GardiziW.McduffieK. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260-270.
25.
MaxwellJ. A.MillerB. (2008). Categorizing and connecting as components in qualitative data analysis. In LeavyP.Hesse-BiberS. (Eds.), Handbook of emerging methods (pp. 461-475). New York, NY: Guilford.
26.
McLaughlinM. J.RhimL. M. (2007). Accountability frameworks and children with disabilities: A test of assumptions about improving public education for all students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 25-49.
27.
MillerK.MorfidiE.SoulisS. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of Greek special Education policies and practices. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 16, 53-65.
28.
MurawskiW. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve?Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 227-247.
29.
MurawskiW. W.HughesC. (2009). Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: A logical combination for successful systemic change. Preventing School Failure, 53, 267-277.
30.
MurawskiW. W.SwansonL. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258-267.
31.
NicholsJ.DowdyA.NicholsC. (2010). Co-teaching: An educational promise for children with disabilities or a quick fix to meet the mandates of no child left behind. Education, 130, 647- 651.
32.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
PinnegarS.HamiltonM. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
34.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P. (2009). A framework for conducting research on collaborative teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 575-582.
35.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
SamarasA. P. (2002). Self-study for teacher educators: Crafting a pedagogy for educational change. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37.
SamarasA. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
SamarasA. P. (2013). Twelve shells: Learning by leading cross-disciplinary faculty self-study of professional practice. Reflective Practice, 14, 519-535.
39.
SamarasA. P.FreeseA. R. (2006). Self-study of teaching practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
40.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
41.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing ground theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
StrogilosV. (2012). The cultural understanding of inclusion and its development within a centralized system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6, 1241-1258.
43.
TorgesenJ. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26.
44.
TremblayP. (2013). Comparative outcomes of two instructional models for students with learning disabilities: Inclusion with co-teaching and solo-taught special education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13, 251-258.
45.
VlachouA.DidaskalouE.ArgyrakouliE. (2006). Preferences of students with general learning difficulties for different service delivery modes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21, 201-216.
46.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
VygotskyL. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. (Original work published 1960)
48.
WhiteheadJ. (2004). What counts as evidence in self-studies of teacher education practices? In LoughranJ. J.HamiltonM. L.LaBoskeyV. K.RussellT. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 871-903). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49.
Zoniou-SideriA.VlachouA. (2006). Greek teachers’ belief systems about disability and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 379-394.
