No Child Left Behind and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Examining Special Educators’ Outcomes

Abstract

Drawing on eight waves of the Schools and Staffing Survey and the National Teacher and Principal Survey, we used a difference-in-differences research design to examine special education teachers’ (SETs) responses to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the subsequent reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). IDEA was associated with decreases in the proportion of SETs with special education as a field of study and graduate degrees, an increase in co-teaching, and a decrease in the proportion of SETs working in a resource delivery model, with no evidence that NCLB influenced these outcomes. Little consistent evidence was found to indicate these federal policies influenced SETs’ job attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction). We identified differences in these associations based on school poverty status and grade level. These findings help to better understand the status and challenges of the current SET workforce and the unintended consequences of federal reform policies.

Keywords

special education teachers NCLB IDEA special education field of study co-teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearn

E. M.

(2009). State eligibility requirements for specific learning disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30(2), 120–128.

Austin

V. L.

(2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200408

Bettini

Nguyen

T. D.

Gilmour

A. F.

Redding

(2022). Disparities in access to well-qualified, well-supported special educators across higher versus lower poverty schools over time. Exceptional Children, 88(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211024137

Billingsley

Bettini

(2019). Special education teacher attrition and retention: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89, 697–744. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862495

Booher-Jennings

(2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002231

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

Danielson

L. C.

(2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307

Cunningham

(2021). Causal inference. Yale University Press.

Dee

T. S.

Jacob

Schwartz

N. L.

(2013). The effects of NCLB on school resources and practices. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 252–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712467080

Dewey

Sindelar

P. T.

Bettini

Boe

E. E.

Rosenberg

M. S.

Leko

(2017). Explaining the decline in special education teacher employment from 2005 to 2012. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916684620

10.

Diamond

J. B.

(2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511431569

11.

Drame

E. R.

Pugach

M. C.

(2009). A HOUSSE built on quicksand? Exploring the teacher quality conundrum for secondary special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409356402

12.

Eckes

S. E.

Swando

(2009). Special education subgroups under NCLB: Issues to consider. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2479–2504. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911101106

13.

Eisenman

L. T.

Pleet

A. M.

Wandry

McGinley

(2011). Voices of special education teachers in an inclusive high school: Redefining responsibilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361248

14.

Feng

Sass

(2013). What makes special education special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.006

15.

Feng

Sass

(2018). The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in “hard-to-staff” subjects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22037

16.

Figlio

D. N.

Getzler

L. S.

(2006). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system? Advances in Applied Microeconomics, 14, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9307

17.

Geiger

W. L.

Mickelson

McKeown

Barton

Kleinhammer-Tramill

Streinbrecher

(2014). Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation. In Sindelar

P. T.

McCray

E. D.

Brownell

M. T.

Lignugaris/Kraft

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 30–46). Routledge.

18.

Gilmour

A. F.

(2020). Teacher certification area and the academic outcomes of students with learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919849905

19.

Gilmour

A. F.

Nguyen

T. D.

Redding

Bettini

(2022). The shifting context of special education teachers’ work and its relationship with retention. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221113016

20.

Goldhaber

Brown

Marcuson

Theobald

(2022). School district job postings and staffing challenges throughout the second school year during the COVID-19 pandemic (Working Paper 273-1022). CALDER.

21.

Goldman

Gilmour

A. F.

(2021). Educating students with autism spectrum disorder: Is teacher certification area associated with academic outcomes? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04561-w

22.

Gomez-Najarro

(2020). An empty seat at the table: Examining general and special education teacher collaboration in response to intervention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419850894

23.

Griffin

C. C.

Kilgore

K. L.

Winn

J. A.

Otis-Wilborn

(2008). First-year special educators’ relationships with their general education colleagues. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 141–157.

24.

Grissom

J. A.

Nicholson-Crotty

Harrington

J. R.

(2014). Estimating the effects of no child left behind on teachers’ work environments and job attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714533817

25.

Hardman

M. L.

Dawson

(2008). The impact of federal public policy on curriculum and instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.5-11

26.

Idol

(2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270020601

27.

James

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

(2022). Local supply, temporal dynamics, and unrealized potential in teacher hiring (Working Paper No. 22-518). Annenberg.

28.

Jones

Winters

M. A.

(2022). Are two teachers better than one? The effect of co-teaching on students with and without disabilities. Journal of Human Resources, 0420–10834R3.

29.

King-Sears

M. E.

Stefanidis

Berkeley

Strogilos

(2021). Does co-teaching improve academic achievement for students with disabilities? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100405.

30.

Klingner

J. K.

Vaughn

(2002). The changing roles and responsibilities of an LD specialist. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511188

31.

Losinski

Sanders

Parks-Ennis

Wiseman

Nelson

Katsiyannis

(2019). An investigation of co-teaching to improve academic achievement of students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 1(1), 149–170.

32.

Mason-Williams

Bettini

Peyton

Harvey

Rosenberg

M. S.

Sindelar

P. T.

(2020). Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880352

33.

McLaughlin

M. J.

(2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600302

34.

Nagle

Yunker

Malmgren

K. W.

(2006). Students with disabilities and accountability reform. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060170010301

35.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). U.S. schools report increased teacher vacancies due to COVID-19 pandemic, new NCES data show. https://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/press_releases/3_3_2022.asp#:~:text=Forty%2Dfour%20percent%20of%20public,of%20schools%20reporting%20this%20vacancy

36.

Nichols

Dowdy

Nichols

(2010). Co-teaching: An educational promise for children with disabilities or a quick fix to meet the mandates of no child left behind? Education, 130(4), 647–652.

37.

O’Brien

K. M.

Brunsting

N. C.

Bettini

Cumming

M. M.

Ragunathan

Sutton

(2019). Special educators’ working conditions in self-contained settings for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A descriptive analysis. Exceptional Children, 86(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919868946

38.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

Correa

V. I.

(2011). A historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411406141

39.

Reback

Rockoff

Schwartz

H. L.

(2014). Under pressure: Job security, resource allocation, and productivity in schools under no child left behind. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.3.207

40.

Ruppar

A. L.

Allcock

Gonsier-Gerdin

(2017). Ecological factors affecting access to general education content and contexts for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 53–63.

41.

Salend

S. J.

Duhaney

L. M.

(1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000209

42.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2017). Making inclusion work with co-teaching. Exceptional Children, 49(4), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685065

43.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

McDuffie

K. A.

(2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401

44.

Shealey

M. W.

Alvarez Mchatton

Farmer

(2009). What does “highly qualified” mean for urban special educators? Urban Education, 44(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909337596

45.

Simonsen

Shaw

S. F.

Faggella-Luby

Sugai

Coyne

M. D.

Rhein

Madaus

J. W.

Alfano

(2010). A schoolwide model for service delivery. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324396

46.

Sindelar

P. T.

Brownell

M. T.

Billingsley

(2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education & Special Education, 33(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409358593

47.

Smith

T. E. C.

(2005). IDEA 2004: Another round in the reauthorization process. Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260060101

48.

Stelitano

Russell

J. L.

Bray

L. E.

(2019). Organizing for meaningful inclusion: Exploring the routines that shape student supports in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 57, 535–575. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219859307

49.

Tankersley

Niesz

Cook

B. G.

Woods

(2007). The unintended side effects of inclusion of students with learning disabilities: The perspectives of special education teachers. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 135–144.

50.

Theobald

Goldhaber

Naito

Stein

(2020). The special education teacher pipeline: Teacher preparation, workforce entry, and retention (Working Paper No. 231-0220). CALDER.

51.

Theoharis

Causton

Tracy-Bronson

(2016). Inclusive reform as a response to high stakes pressure? Leading toward inclusion in the age of accountability. Teachers College Record, 118(14), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801403

52.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (Vol. II). https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/teaching/nclb/execsum.html

53.

Vannest

K. J.

Hagan-Burke

(2010). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327459

54.

Wexler

Kearns

D. M.

Lemons

C. J.

Mitchell

M. A.

Clancy

Davidson

K. A.

Sinclair

A. C.

Wei

(2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 384–402.

55.

Williamson

Hoppey

McLeskey

Bergmann

Moore

(2020). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. The Journal of Special Education, 53, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919855052

56.

Winters

J. V.

(2011). Teacher salaries and teacher unions: A spatial econometric approach. ILR Review, 64(4), 747–764.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB