The purpose of this study was to describe the use of service-learning (SL) by special education faculty at 4-year colleges and universities across the United States, and to determine faculty attitudes and beliefs about the application of SL in special education. Participants included faculty with experience in SL teaching and/or research in special education (N = 48). Data were gathered using a survey. Results show that faculty represented a wide range of institutions and had varying levels of SL experience. There was variability in beliefs about and implementation of SL across faculty. Barriers to incorporating SL in courses and research were minimal. Significant differences in attitudes and beliefs were found based on type of institution, size of institution, and size of community.
AbesE. S.JacksonG.JonesS. R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 5-17.
2.
Al OtaibaS. (2005). How effective is code-based reading tutoring in English for English learners and preservice teacher-tutors?Remedial and Special Education, 26, 245-254.
3.
Alvarez-McHattonP.ThomasD.LehmanK. (2006). Lessons learned in service-learning: Personnel preparation through community action. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. Special Issue: Service-Learning and Advocacy, 14, 67-79.
4.
AndersonJ. B. (1998). Service-learning and teacher education: ERIC Digest 97-1. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
5.
AndersonJ. B.CallahanJ. (2005). The institutionalization of service-learning in preservice teacher education. In RootS.CallahanJ.BilligS. H. (Eds.), Improving service-learning practice: Research on models to enhance impacts (pp. 17-36). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
6.
AndersonJ. B.EricksonJ. A. (2003). Service-learning in preservice teacher education. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7, 111-115.
7.
AndersonJ. B.PickeralT. (2000). Challenges and strategies for success with service-learning in preservice teacher education. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 25, 7-22.
8.
BringleR.HatcherJ. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 112-122.
9.
BringleR.HatcherJ. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221-239.
10.
Campus Compact. (2007). 2006 Service statistics: Highlights and trends of campus compact’s annual membership survey. Providence, RI: Author.
CookC.HeathF.ThompsonR. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821-836.
CurranJ. M. (1999, August). Changing attitudes toward people with mental retardation: Effects of extended contact within changing social context. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, New Mexico. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443314)
16.
CzajaR.BlairJ. (1996). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
17.
DavisM. T.EmeryM. J.LaneC. (1998). Serve to learn: Making connections in rural communities. Paper presented at American Council on Rural Special Education, Making Connections in rural communities. In MontgomeryD. (Ed.), Coming together: Preparing for rural special education in the 21st century. Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (pp. 75-83). Charleston, SC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED417890)
18.
DriscollA. (2000). Studying faculty and service-learning: Directions for inquiry and development [Special issue]. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning: Strategic Directions for Service-Learning Research, (Special Issue) 35-41.
19.
DriscollA. (2009). Carnegie’s new community engagement classification: Affirming higher education’s role in community. New Directions for Higher Education, 147, 5-12.
20.
FurcoA.AmmonM. S. (2000). Service-learning in California’s teacher education programs: A white paper. Berkeley, CA: Service-Learning Research and Development Center.
21.
GentP. J.GureckaL. E. (2001). Service-learning: A disservice to people with disabilities?Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 8, 36-43.
22.
GriffithA. S. (2005). Service learning: Packing parachutes for the jump into education. Teacher Education and Practice, 18, 282-296.
23.
HammondC. (1994). Integrating service and academic study: Faculty motivation and satisfaction in Michigan higher education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1, 21-28.
24.
HarwoodA. M.FlissD.GauldingE. (2006). Impacts of a service-learning seminar and practicum on preservice teachers’ understanding of pedagogy, community, and themselves. In CaseyK.DavidsonG.BilligS. H.SpringN. (Eds.), Advancing knowledge in service-learning: Research to transform the field 6 (pp. 137-158). Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
25.
HarwoodA. M.OchsL.CurrierD.DukeS.HammondJ.MouldsL.. . . WerderC. (2005). Communities for growth: Cultivating and sustaining service-learning teaching and scholarship in a faculty fellows program. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12, 41-51.
26.
JenkinsA.SheeheyP. (2009). Implementing service learning in special education coursework: What we learned. Education, 129, 668-682.
27.
KarayanS.GathercoalP. (2003). Empowering students with special needs through service-learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7, 151-157.
28.
KennedyV. (2005). Service learning and the induction of teachers. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9, 292-296.
29.
KrathwohlD. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
30.
MayhewJ.WelchM. (2001). A call to service: Service learning as a pedagogy in special education programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 208-219.
31.
MuscottH. S. (2001). Using service-learning to enhance the preparation of pre-service special education teachers at Rivier college. In AndersonJ. A.SwickK. J.YffJ. (Eds.), Service-learning in teacher education: Enhancing the growth of new teachers, their students, and communities (pp. 188-198). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
32.
MuscottH. S.O’BrienS. T. (1999). Teaching character education to students with behavioral and learning disabilities through mentoring relationships. Education & Treatment of Children, 22, 373-390.
33.
MuwanaF. C.GaffneyJ. S. (2011). Service-learning experiences of college freshmen, community partners, and consumers with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 21-36.
34.
NovakJ. (2010). Learning through service: A course designed to influence positively students’ disability-related attitudes. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36, 121-123.
35.
NovakJ.MurrayM.ScheuermannA.CurranE. (2009). Enhancing the preparation of special educators through service learning: Evidence from two courses. International Journal of Special Education, 24, 32-44.
36.
ParkerK. (2009). The RAP: A recreational activities project, academic service-learning course and qualitative research study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 404-412.
37.
PotthoffD. E.DinsmoreJ. E.StirtzG.WalshT.ZiebarthJ.EiflerK. (2000). The effects of field experience on preservice teachers’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Action in Teacher Education, 22, 79-92.
38.
PribbenowD. A. (2005). The impact of service-learning pedagogy on faculty teaching and learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11, 25-38.
39.
PugachM. C. (2001). Associate editor’s exchange: A dean’s grant initiative for the twenty-first century?Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 256-261.
RootS. (1994). Service-learning in teacher education: A third rationale. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1, 94-97.
42.
RootS.CallahanJ.SepanskiJ. (2002). Service-learning in teacher education: A consideration of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. In FurcoA.BilligS. H. (Eds.), Advances in service-learning research: Vol. 1. Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 223-243). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
43.
SchnaubeltT.StathamA. (2007). Faculty perceptions of service as a mode of scholarship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 18-31.
44.
SmithV. M. (2003). You have to learn who comes with the disability: Students’ reflections on service learning experiences with peers labeled with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 79-90.
WadeR. C. (1995). Developing active citizens: Community service learning in social studies teacher education. Social Studies, 86, 122-128.
47.
WadeR. C. (1997). Empowerment in student teaching through community service learning. Theory Into Practice, 36, 184-191.
48.
WassermanK. B. (2009). The role of service-learning in transforming teacher candidates’ teaching of reading. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1043-1050.
49.
WelchM.JamesR. C. (2007). An investigation on the impact of a guided reflection technique in service-learning courses to prepare special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 276-285.
