A process was developed to create Web-based video models of effective instructional practices for use in teacher education settings. Three video models, created at three university sites, demonstrated exemplary implementation of specific, evidence-based strategies in reading, math, and science. Video models of strategies were field tested with preservice and practicing teachers working with diverse student populations. The authors provide an explanation of the video development process and present field-test data that demonstrate the influence of video modeling on teacher learning.
Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (2001). Text Talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. Reading Teacher, 55, 10-20.
2.
Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction . New York: Guilford.
3.
Beck, R.J., King, A., & Marshall, S.K. (2002). Effects of videocase construction on preservice teachers' observations of teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(4), 345.
4.
Bosco, J. (1986). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video . Educational Technology, 26(5), 7-17.
5.
Bransford, J.D., Sherwood, R.D., Hasselbring, T.S., Kinzer, C.K., & Williams, S.M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Sprio (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Brownell, M.T., Smith, S.W., McNellis, J.R., & Miller, M.D. (1997). Attrition in special education: Why teachers leave the classroom and where they go. Exceptionality, 7, 143-155.
7.
Bryant, B.R. (1996). Using alternative assessment techniques to plan and evaluate mathematics instruction. LD Forum, 21(2), 24-33.
8.
Carnine, D. (1999). Campaigns for moving research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 2-6.
9.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. ( 1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-11.
10.
Deal, W.F., III. (2003). The technology teacher's toolbox: Streaming video . Technology Teacher, 62(8), 18-21.
11.
Denton, C.A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J.M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201-211.
12.
Dhonau, S., & McAlpine, D. (2002). "Streaming" best practices: Using digital video-teaching segments in the FL/ESL methods course. Foreign Language Annals , 35, 632-636.
13.
Fill, K., & Ottewill, R. (2006). Sink or swim: Taking advantage of developments in video streaming. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 397-408.
14.
Fletcher, J.D. (1989). The effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction. Machine-Mediated Learning, 3(4), 361-385.
15.
Fletcher, J.D. (1990). Effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction in defense training and education (IDA Report r2372). Arlington, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis .
16.
Florida Department of Education. (2006). Educator certification: Information about teaching for the career changer or college graduate of a non-education program. Publisher .
17.
Friel, S.N., & Carboni, L.W. (2000). Using video-based pedagogy in an elementary mathematics methods course. School Science & Mathematics, 100(3), 118-127.
18.
Ginsburg, H.P. (1987). How to assess number facts, calculation, and understanding . In D. D. Hammill (Ed.), Assessing the abilities and instructional needs of students (pp 483-503). Austin, TX: PrO-Ed.
19.
Glaser, C.W., Rieth, H.J., Kinzer, C.K., Colburn, L.K., & Peter, J. (1999). A description of the impact of multimedia anchored instruction on classroom interactions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 27-43.
Howell, K.W., Fox, S.L., & Morehead, M.K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision-making (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22.
Hughes, J.E., Packard, B.W., & Pearson, P.D. (2000). The role of hypermedia cases on preservice teachers' views of reading instruction. Action in Teacher Education , 22(2), 24-38.
23.
Kennedy, L.M., & Tipps, S. (1998). Guiding children's learning of mathematics (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24.
Kinzer, C.K., & Risko, V.J. (1998). Multimedia and enhanced learning: Transforming preservice education. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 185-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 483-486.
26.
Liedtke, W. (1988, November). Diagnosis in mathematics: The advantages of an interview. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(3), 181-184.
27.
MacDonald, C.J., Stodel, E.J., Farres, L.G., Breithaupt, K., & Gabriel, M.A. (2001). The demand driven learning model: A framework for Web-based learning. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 9-30.
28.
Martinez, E.A., & Hallahan, D.P. (2000). Some thoughts on international perspectives in special education, with special attention to the research-to-practice gap. Exceptionality, 8, 305-311.
29.
McLeskey, J.L., Tyler, N.C., & Flippin, S.S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. Journal of Special Education, 38, 5-21.
30.
McMaster, K.N., & Fuchs, D. (2005). A focus on cooperative learning for students with disabilities (No. 11). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, Division of Learning Disabilities and Division of Research.
31.
McNeil, B.J., & Nelson, K.R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10 year review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(1), 1-6.
32.
Mercer, C.D., & Mercer, A.R. (2004). Teaching students with learning problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
Newman, F., & Scurry, J. (2001). Online technology pushes pedagogy to the forefront . Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(44), B7.
34.
O'Brien, C., Dieker, L.A., & Platt, J.C. (2006). Can academically struggling adolescents learn to implement inclusive learning strategies from video models? A research brief (MURMSI Research Brief No. G-1A). Tallahassee: Florida State University, Learning Systems Institute.
35.
Office of Policy Research and Improvement. ( 2002). Critical teacher shortage areas 2003-2004. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.
36.
Rieth, H.J., Bryant, D.P., Kinzer, C.K., Colburn, L.K., Hur, S.-J., Hartman, P., et al. (2003). An analysis of the impact of anchored instruction on teaching and learning activities in two ninth-grade language arts classes . Remedial and Special education, 24, 173-184.
37.
Rosenberg, M.S., & Sindelar, P.T. (2001). The proliferation of alternative routes to certification in special education: A critical review of the literature . Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
38.
Schrader, P., Leu, D., & Kinzer, C. (2003). Using Internet delivered video cases to support pre-service teachers' understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science, 31(4-5), 317-340.
39.
Teh, G.P.L. (1999). Assessing student perceptions of Internet-based online learning environments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26, 397-402.
40.
Van de Walle, J.A. (1994). Elementary school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY : Longman.
41.
Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H., & Stern, H.W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Zigmond, N., Vallecorsa, A., & Silverman, R. (1981). Assessment for instructional planning in special education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
