At the postsecondary level, instructors widely use a lecture format to impart knowledge to students. With this pilot study, the authors examine the effects of guided notes and response cards on students' performance on weekly quiz scores and in-class participation. Using an ABCBC withdrawal design, guided notes and response cards used together are found to increase students' quiz scores. Frequency of active student response is higher with use of response cards in comparison to when students are asked to raise their hands to answer teacher-posed questions. Results of consumer satisfaction surveys reveal that most students prefer guided notes and response cards to traditional-style lectures in their college classrooms. Based on the tentative findings of this study, future directions for research and implications for practice are discussed.
Austin, J.L., Lee, M.G., & Carr, J.P. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students' recording of lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology , 31(4), 314-320.
2.
Austin, J.L., Lee, M.G., Thibeault, M.D., Carr, J.E., & Bailey, J.S. (2002). Effects of guided notes on university students' responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 243-254.
3.
Baker, L., & Lombardi, B.R. (1985). Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology , 12, 28-32.
4.
Beckley, C.G., Al-Attrash, M., & Heward, W.L. (1997). Using guided notes in an eight grade social studies class: Effects on next-day quiz scores and note-taking accuracy. Poster presented at the 23rd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.
5.
Carlson, E., Lee, H., & Schroll, K. (2004). Identifying attributes of high quality special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education , 27(4), 350-359.
6.
Cavanaugh, R.A., Heward, W.L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403-406.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
9.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Universal design for learning: A guide for teachers and educational professionals . Arlington, VA: Author.
10.
Daly, E.J., III, Chafouleas, S., & Skinner, C.H. (2005). Interventions for reading problems: Designing and evaluating effective strategies. New York: Guilford.
11.
Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D.W., & Trivette, C.M. (2004). Guidelines for calculating effect sizes for practice-based research syntheses. Centerscope , 3(1). Retrieved December 15, from http://www.evidencebasedpractices.org/centerscope/centerscopev013n01.pdf
12.
Gardner, R., III, Heward, W.L., & Grossi, T.A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
13.
Heward, W.L. (1997). Four validated instructional strategies. Behavior and Social Issues, 7(1), 43-51.
14.
Heward, W.L. (2001). Guided notes: Improving the effectiveness of your lectures. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Partnership Grant for Improving the Quality of Education for Students with Disabilities. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://education.osu.edu/wheward/publications/GN_Fast_Facts_(color_pdf).pdf
15.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
16.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for critical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Kellum, K.K., Carr, J.E., & Dozier, C.L. (2001). Response-card instruction and student learning in a college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 101-104.
18.
Lazarus, B.D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and postsecondary students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 272-289.
19.
Marmolejo, E.K., Wilder, D., & Bradley, L. (2004). A preliminary analysis of the effects of response cards on student performance and participation in an upper division university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 405-410.
20.
Narayan, J.S., Heward, W.L., Gardner, R., III, Courson, F.H., & Omness , C. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483-490.
21.
Neef, N., McCord, B., & Ferreri, S.J. (2006). Effects of guided notes versus completed notes during lectures on college students' quiz performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 123-130.
