This study evaluated the quality of the research and evidence base for using response cards to increase opportunities to respond (OTR) for students with and without disabilities at the elementary level (i.e., kindergarten through Grade 5). Using quality indicator criteria for single-case research, six single-case studies investigating response cards were analyzed. Based on an analysis of quality indicators, results established the use of response cards as an evidence-based practice with a moderate level of evidence. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
ArmendarizF.UmbreitJ. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152–158. doi:10.1177/109830079900100303
2.
BarbettaP. M.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 126–130.
3.
*BerrongA. K.SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.CollinsB. C. (2007). The effects of response cards on active participation and social behavior of students with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 187–199. doi:10.1007/s10882-007-9047-7
4.
BrophyJ.GoodT. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In
WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
5.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11. doi:10.1177/0022466908315563
6.
CarnineD. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
7.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
8.
ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.BakerS. K.DoablerC.ApichatabutraC. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75, 263–281.
9.
ChristleC. A.SchusterJ. W. (2003). The effects if using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole class, math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147–165.
10.
CookB. G.SchirmerB. R. (Eds.). (2003). What is special about special education? Introduction to the special series [Special Issue]. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 139.
11.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.
12.
DavisL. L.O’NeillR. E. (2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 219–222.
13.
DesrochersM. N.ShelnuttJ. M. (2012). Effect of answer format and review method on college students’ learning. Computers & Education, 59, 946–951.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2001). One blueprint for bridging the gap: Project PROMISE. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 304–314.
15.
FujikiM.SpackmanM. P.BrintonB.IlligT. (2008). Ability of children with language impairment to understand emotion conveyed by prosody in a narrative passage. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 330–345.
16.
*GardnerR.HewardW. L.GrossiT. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71.
17.
GodfreyS. A.Grisham-BrownJ.SchusterJ. W.HemmeterM. L. (2003). The effects of three techniques on student participation with preschool children with attending problems. Education & Treatment of Children, 26, 255–272.
18.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ.HallR. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In
HewardW. L.HeronT. E.HillD. S.Trap-PorterJ. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
19.
GreshamF. M. (2005). Treatment integrity and therapeutic change: Commentary on Perepletchikova and Kazdin. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 391–394.
20.
HallR. V.DelquadriJ.GreenwoodC. R.ThurstonL. (1982). The importance of opportunity to respond in children’s academic success. In
EdgarB. E.HaringN. G.JenkinsJ. R.PiousC. G. (Eds.), Mentally handicapped children: Education and training (pp. 107–140). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
21.
HaydonT.BordersC.EmburyD.ClakeL. (2009). Using effective instructional delivery as a classroom management tool. Beyond Behavior, 18(2), 12–17.
22.
HewardW. L. (1994). Three “low tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In
GardnerR.IIISainatoD. M.CooperJ. O.HeronT. E. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
HewardW. L.GardnerR.IIICavanaughR. A.CoursonF. H.GrossiT. A.BarbettaP. M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class: Using response cards to increase active student response. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 28(2), 4–11.
24.
HornC. (2010). Response cards: An effective intervention for students with disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 116–123.
25.
HornC.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C. (2006). Use of response cards to teach telling time to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 382–391.
26.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
27.
HornerR. H.KratochwillT. R. (2011). Using single-case research to identify evidence-based practices. Savage Controversies, 1, 2–5.
28.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1975).
29.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
30.
KauffmanJ. M. (1996). Research to practice issues. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 55–60.
31.
KernL.ClemensN. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75.
32.
*LambertM. C.CartledgeG.HewardW. L.LoY. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 88–89.
33.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340.
34.
MarmolejoE. K.WilderD. A.BradleyL. (2004). A preliminary analysis of the effects of response cards on student performance and participation in an upper division university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 405–410.
35.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
36.
MillerA. D.HallS. W.HewardW. L. (1995). Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials with and without inter-trial feedback and self-correction on general and special education students’ fluency with match facts. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 319–345.
37.
MontagueM.DietzS. (2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75, 285–302.
38.
*MunroD. W.StephensonJ. (2009). The effects of response cards on student and teacher behavior during vocabulary instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 795–800.
39.
*NarayanJ. S.HewardW. L.GardnerR.CoursonF. H.OmnessC. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483–490.
40.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
41.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
42.
PerepletchikovaF.KazdinA. E. (2005). Treatment integrity and therapeutic change: Issues and research recommendations. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 365–383.
43.
PetersonL.HomerA. L.WonderlichS. A. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477–492.
44.
RandolphJ. J. (2007). Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 113–128.
45.
ShabaniD. B.CarrJ. E. (2004). An evaluation of response cards as an adjunct to standard instruction in university classrooms: A systematic replication and extension. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 85–100.
46.
SkiboH.MimsP.SpoonerF. (2011). Teaching number identification to students with severe disabilities using response cards. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 46, 124–133.
47.
StichterJ. P.LewisT. J.WhittakerT.RichterM.JohnsonN.TrussellR. P. (2009). Assessing teacher use of opportunities to respond and effective classroom management strategies within inclusive classrooms: Comparisons among high and low risk elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 68–81.
48.
SutherlandK. S.ConroyM.AbramsL.VoA. (2010). Improving interactions between teachers and young children with problem behavior: A strengths-based approach. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 18(2), 70–81. doi:10.1080/09362831003673101
49.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . .KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary-transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
50.
*WoodC. L.MabryL. E.KretlowA. G.LoY.GallowayT. W. (2009). Effects of preprinted response cards on students’ participation and off-task behavior in a rural kindergarten classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28, 39–47.
