To date, research has not sufficiently addressed the impact of personnel preparation programs on secondary special educators in relationship to specialized competencies needed to impact students during transition from school to adult life. This study sought to evaluate transition competencies gained by secondary practitioners involved in a transition teacher education program. We were particularly interested in examining whether graduates of our programs reported increased levels of competence upon completion of the program. Responses were compared to a pre-assessment measure to determine significant levels of change. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, findings were overwhelmingly positive. Over time, our evaluation methods have expanded in terms of sophistication. Finally, this article addresses strategies for evaluating personnel preparation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, P., Quenemoen, R., Olsen, K., & Thurlow, M. (2000). Gray areas of assessment systems. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
2.
Anderson, D., Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J., Morningstar, M. E., Lehmann, J., Bassett, D., & Kohler, P., et al. (2003). What's happening in personnel preparation in transition? A national survey.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 145-160.
3.
Bass, K. M., & R. Glaser. (2004). Developing assessments to inform teaching and learning. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, CRESST/Learning Research and Development Center.
4.
Barrett, H. C. (2000). “Electronic porfolios = multimedia development + portfolio development: The electronic development process.” Retrieved April 15, 2004, from http://helenbarrett.com/portfolios/aahe2000. html
5.
Benitez, D. (2005). Transition services and delivery: A multi-state study of special education teachers' percerptions of their transition competencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
6.
Benitez, D., & Morningstar, M. E. (2005). A multi-state study of special education teachers' perceptions of their own transition competencies. Paper presented at the international conference of the Division of Career Development and Transition, Albuquerque, N.M.
7.
Blalock, G., Kochhar-Bryant, C., Test, D., Kohler, P., White, W., & Lehmann, J., et al. (2003). The need for comprehensive personnel preparation in transition and career development: A position statement of the division on career development and transition.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 207-226.
8.
Boudah, D., & Mitchell, V. J. (1998). The real thing. Journal of Staff Development, 19(3), 43-47, Retrieved April 2, 2005 from Wilson Omni Files.
9.
Carlson, E., Brauen, M., Klein, S., Schroll, K., & Willig, S. (2002). Study of personnel needs in special education: Key findings. Gainsville, FL: University of Florida.
10.
Carlson, E., Lee, H., & Schroll, K. (2004). Identifying teacher attributes of high quality special education teachers.Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 350-359.
11.
Clark, G. M., Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J., & Morningstar, M. E. (1999). Interprofessional Transition High Incidence Personnel Preparation, USDOE-OSEP, Division of Personnel Preparation, High Incidence Disability. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
12.
Clark, G. M. (1984). Issues in teacher education for secondary special education: Time for hindsight and foresight.Teacher Education and Special Education, 7, 170-177.
13.
Clark, G. M., & Oliverson, B. S. (1973). Education of secondary personnel: Assumptions and preliminary data.Exceptional Children, 39, 541-546.
14.
Cochran-Smith, M. & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.) (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associate.
16.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed). Reston, VA: Author.
17.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence.Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-52.
18.
Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Division of Career Development and Transition. (March 2000). Transition specialist competencies Fact sheet. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
20.
deFur, S. (1997). Collaboration as a prevention tool for youth with disabilities.Preventing School Failure, 41, 173-178.
21.
deFur, S., & Taymans, J. (1995). Competencies needed for transition specialists in vocational rehabilitation, vocational education, and special education.Exceptional Children, 62, 38-51.
22.
Elksnin, L. K. (2001). Implementing the case method of instruction in special education teacher preparation programs.Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 95-107.
23.
Flexer, R. W., & Baer, R. M. (2005). Description and evaluation of a university-based transition endorsement program.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 80-91.
24.
Flexer, R. W., Baer, R. M., Simmons, T. J., & Shell, D. (1997). Translating Research, Innovation and Policy: Interdisciplinary Transition Leadership Training.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20, 55-67.
25.
Frary, R. B. (2000). Testing memo 8: Reliability of test scores. Retrieved on April 1, 2006 from http://www. testscoring.vt.edu/memo08.html
26.
Garcia, D. C. (2004). Exploring connections between the construct of teacher efficacy and family involvement practices: Implications for urban teacher preparation.Urban Education, 39, 290-315.
27.
Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A., & Lee, C. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 201-231). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Jones, K. P., & Reed, R. P. (2002). Teacher involving parents (TIP): Results of an inservice teacher education program for enhancing parental involvement.Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 843-867.
30.
Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluations (8th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
31.
Kansas State Department of Education. (2003). Certified personnel report State profile 2002-2003. Topeka, KS: Kansas State Department of Education.
32.
Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J., Geiger, W., & Morningstar, M. (2003). Policy contexts for transition personnel preparation: An analysis of transition-related credentials, standards, and course requirements in state certification and licensure policies.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 185-206.
33.
Knott, L., & Asselin, S. B. (1999). Transition competencies: Perception of secondary special education teachers.Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 55-65.
34.
Kochhar-Bryant, C. (2003). Building Transition Capacity Through Personnel Development: Analysis of 35 State Improvement Grants.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 161-184.
35.
Kohler, P. D., & Greene, G. (2004). Strategies for integrating transition-related competencies into teacher education.Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 146-162.
36.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McLesky, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2004). Three concepts of teacher learning: Exploring the relationships between knowledge and the practice of teaching.Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 3-14.
39.
Morningstar, M. E., & Clark, G. M. (2003). The status of personnel preparation for transition education and services: What is the critical content? How can It be offered?Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 227-237.
40.
Morningstar, M. E., & Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J. (2005). Professional development for transition personnel: Current issues and strategies for success.National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Information Brief, 4(3), 1-5.
41.
Morningstar, M. E., Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J., & Lattin, D. L. (1999). Using Successful Models of student-centered transition planning and services for adolescents with Disabilities.Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(9), 2-20.
42.
National Center for Secondary Education and Transition. (2004). A National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth: State Priorities and Needs for Assistance. Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
43.
Noonan, P. M. (2004). Developing interventions to improve interagency collaboration in providing transition services for youth with disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
44.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45.
Qualis Research Associates. (1998). The Ethnograph (Version 5.08). Denver, CO: Author.
46.
Riconscente, M. (2000). Digital portfolios: An enduring promise for enhancing assessment. New York, NY: Center for Children and Technology.
47.
Severson, S. J., Hoover, J. H., & Wheeler, J. J. (1994). Transition: An integrated model for the pre- and in-service training of special education teachers.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 145-158.
48.
Sindelar, P. T., Bishop, A. G., Brownell, M. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Connelly, V. J. (2005). Lessons from special education research.Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(3), 35-48.
49.
Smith, S. J., & E. L. Meyen. (2003). Applications of online instruction: An overview for teachers, students with mild disabilities and their parents.Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(6), 1-15.
50.
Storms, J., & Sullivan, L. (2000). Transition Requirements: A Guide for States, Districts, Schools, Universities, and Families. Eugene, OR: Western Regional Resource Center.
51.
Thornton, H., & L. Wexler, et al. (2004). Accountability for results: The big picture. Special education: Federal actions can assist states in improving postsecondary outcomes for youth. Washington, DC,
52.
U. S. General Accounting Office. (2003, July). Special education: Federal actions can assist states in improving postsecondary outcomes for youth. (GAO-03-773). Washington, DC: Author.
53.
Webb, K., Asselin, S., Bassett, D., Hutchinson, S., & Wandry, D. (2005). Identifying barriers to transition according to teacher candidates: Preliminary results. Paper presented at the Division of Career Development and Transition International Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
54.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), Retrieved May 12, 2006 from http://epaa.asu. edu/epaa/v10n12/.
55.
Zhang, Z. (1997). Assessment practices inventory: A multivariate analysis of teachers' perceived assessment competency. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education National Conference, Chicago, IL.
