Teacher educators are under increasing pressure to show that preparation programs meaningfully impact instruction among pre-service teachers, who are then influential in student learning. This external pressure is challenging for teacher educators. We present an early field-based course and applied teaching project to examine teaching practices and pupil outcomes. Over 400 candidates taught lessons, utilized evidence-based practices, collected information before and after instruction, and responded to information gleaned from instructional experiences. Candidates provided nearly 17,000 hours of in-class assistance over four semesters, taught more than 800 lessons, used selected evidence-based teaching practices with high degrees of accuracy, and made a noticeable impact in over 60% of sampled lessons. Implications for teacher educators in general and special education are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Abell Foundation. (October 2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality.Baltimore: Author. Retrieved on March 22, 2005 from http:// www.abell.org.
2.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence?Teachers College Record, 102(1), 5–27.
3.
Blanton, L., Sindelar, P. T., Correa, V., Hardman, M., McDonnell, J., & Keuhl, K. (2003, July). Conceptions of beginning teacher quality: Models for conducting research. COPSSE Document No. RS-6. Gainesville, FL: Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education. Retrieved on May 4, 2005 from www.copsse.org
4.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
5.
Brownell, M. T., Bishop, A., Penfield, R., Sindelar, P., Klingner, J., Menon, S., Gersten, R., Haager, D., & Diminio, J. (2004, November). Beginning teacher quality study. Paper presentation at Annual Convention of the Teacher Education Division (TED) of the Council for Exceptional Children. Albuquerque, New Mexico.
6.
Carnine, D. (2000, April). Why education experts resist effective practice: Report of the Thomas B. Fordham FoundationWashington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
7.
Coalition for Evidence Based Educational Policy Report. (2002). Rigorous evidence: The key to progress in education. Available from: http//www.excelgov.org/ displayContent.asp?Keyword5prppcEvidence
8.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Teaching quality matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 95–98.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “high quality teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
10.
Denner, P., Salzman, S., & Bangert, A. (2001). Linking teacher assessment to student performance: A benchmarking, generalizability, and validity study of the use of teacher work samples. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Teacher Education, 15, 287–307.
11.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
12.
Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., Karnes, M., & Mallette, B. (1999). The Instructional Assistants Program: A potential entry point for behavior analysis in education. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 447–469.
13.
Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., & Mallette, B. (2005). Developing, implementing and maintaining a responsive educator program for pre-service general education teachers. In W. E. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson, D. M. Sainato, G. Cartledge, R. Gardner III, L. D. Peterson, S. B. Hersh, & J. C. Dardig (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 139–153). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
14.
McConney, A. A., Schalock, M. D., & Schalock, H. D. (1998). Focusing improvement and quality assurance: Work samples as authentic performance measures of prospective teachers' effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 343–363.
15.
National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2002). Professional standards for accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of educationWashington, DC: NCATE.
16.
Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
17.
Popham, W. J. (2005). All about accountability/ instructional quality: Collecting credible evidence. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 80–81.
18.
Renaissance Partnership for Improving Teacher Quality. (June 2002). Teacher Work Sample: Performance prompts, teaching process standards, and scoring rubrics.Western Kentucky University. Available from http:// fp.uni.edu/itq
19.
Schwartz, I. S. (2003). Social-validity assessments: Voting on science or acknowledging the roots of applied behavior analysis? In T. Stokes & K. Budd (Eds.), A small matter of proof: The legacy of Donald M. Baer (pp. 53–62). Reno, NV: Context Press.
20.
U. S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary's annual report on teacher qualityWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Post-secondary Education, Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
21.
Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190–204.
