As P-12 education changes to meet the needs of children and federal and state regulations, teacher education must change to prepare candidates with knowledge and skills expected of today's educators. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and No Child Left Behind Act increased opportunities for students with disabilities to be educated within the general education classroom, thus increasing the accountability of general educators for the progress of these children. Today's general and special educators must develop skills as collaborative educators to educate children with disabilities. This article explores this collaborative relationship, discusses implications for change in teacher preparation, and describes one teacher education seminar designed to provide prospective general and special educators with opportunities to practice essential skills of collaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Affleck, J. Q., Madge, S., Adams, A., & Low-enbraun, S. (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339–348.
2.
Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J. J. (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students.Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
3.
Blanton, L. P. (1992). Preservice education: Essential knowledge for the effective special education teacher. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 87–96.
4.
Boudah, D. J., Schumacher, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293–316.
5.
Caplin, G. (1970). The theory and practice of mental health consultation.New York: Basic Books.
6.
Dettmer, P., Thurston, L. P., & Dyck, N. (2002). Consultation, collaboration and teamwork for students with special needs.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
DuFour, R. (1995). Restructuring is not enough. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 33–36.
8.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2002). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Friend, M., Reising, M., & Cook, L. (1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure, 34(4), 6–10.
10.
Gerber, P. J., & Popp, P. A. (2000). Making collaborative teaching more effective for academically able students: Recommendations for implementation and training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 229–236.
11.
Harris, K. C., & Zetlin, A. G. (1993). Exploring the collaborative ethic in an urban school: A case study. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 4(4), 305–317.
12.
Hoppey, D., Yendol-Silva, D., & Pullen, P. (2004). We became teachers together: Understanding collaborative teaching as innovation in unified teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 26(1), 12–25.
13.
House, S. (2004a). Behavior Intervention ManualColumbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
14.
House, S. (2004b). Learning Intervention ManualColumbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
15.
Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 315–332.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Public Law 105-17. (1997). Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/Policy/IDEA/index.html
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). P. L. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647.
18.
Idol, L., West, J. F., & Lloyd, S. R. (1988). Organizing and implementing specialized reading programs: A collaborative approach involving classroom, remedial, and special education teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 54–61.
19.
Kain, D. L. (1996). Looking beneath the surface: Teacher collaboration through the lens of grading practices. Teachers College Record, 97(4), 569–587.
20.
Keefe, E. B., & Moore, V. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 77–88.
21.
Kennedy, K. Y., Higgins, K., & Pierce, T. (2002). Collaborative partnerships among teachers of students who are gifted and have learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(1), 36–49.
22.
Lombardo, L. A. (1999, Summer). Regulations Foster Positive Behavior Supports, Discipline. Counterpoint, 1, 5.
23.
Lowenbraun, S., Madge, S., & Affleck, J. Q. (1990). Parental satisfaction with integrated class replacement of special education and general education students. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 37–40.
24.
Madge, S., Affleck, J. Q., & Lowenbraun, S. (1990). Social effects of integrated classroom and resource room/regular class placement on elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 439–445.
25.
McCarney, S. B., Wunderlich, K. C., & Bauer, A. (1994). Teacher's Resource GuideColumbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
26.
National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities. (1997). The IDEA amendments of 1997Washington, D.C.: National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities.
27.
Pugach, M. C. (1988). The consulting teacher in the context of educational reform. Educational Children, 55, 273–275.
28.
Rea, P. J., McLaughlin, V. L., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68, 203–222.
29.
Sayler, B. K., Thyfault, A., & Curran, C. (2002). Tools of the trade: Effective strategies to support the collaboration of educators in rural schools. In: No child left behind: The vital role of rural schools. Annual National Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education, Reno, Nevada, March 7-9.
30.
Sileo, T. W., Prater, M. A., Luckner, J. L., Rhine, B., & Rude, H. A. (1998). Strategies to facilitate preservice teachers' active involvement in learning. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 187–204.
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (no date). Introduction: No Child Left Behind. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/index.html
32.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2003). Report on Number, Percentage, Difference from National Baseline, and Percent Change in the Percentage of Students Ages 6-21 Served in Different Educational Environments. Available from http://www.IDEAdata.org
33.
Walther-Thomas, C. S. (1997). Co-teaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 395–407.
34.
Warger, C. D., & Pugach, M. C. (1996). Curriculum considerations in an inclusive environment. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(8), 1–12.
35.
Beard, L. A., & Harper, C. (2002). Student perceptions of online versus campus instruction. Education, 122(4), 658–663.
36.
Bennett, G. (2001). Student learning in the online environment: No significant difference?Quest, 53(1), 13.
37.
Bradburn, E. M. (2002). Distance education instruction by postsecondary faculty and staff: FallEducation Statistics Quarterly. [Online] Available at: http://nces.ed. gov/pubs2002/2002155.pdf
38.
Cooper, L. W. (2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer application classes. T. H. E. Journal, 28(8), 52–55.
39.
Faux, T. L., & Black-Hughes, C. (2000). A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 454–466.
40.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2002). Including Students with Special Needs: A Practical Guide for Classroom Teachers (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
41.
Hantula, D. A. (1998). The virtual industrial/organizational psychology class: Learning and teaching in cyberspace in three iterations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30, 205–216.
42.
Hofmann, D. W. (2002). Internet-based distance learning in higher education. Tech Directions, 62(1), 28–32.
43.
Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based instructionEngle-wood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
44.
Khan, B. H. (2000). A framework for E-learning. Distance Education Report, 4(24), 3–8.
45.
Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, F., Levin, D., & Greene, B. (1999). Distance education at postsecondary education institutes 1997-98.National Center for Education Statistics [Online]. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/ pubs2000/2000013.pdf
46.
Lu, A. X. Y., Zhu, J. J. H., & Stokes, M. (2000). The use and effects of Web-based instruction: Evidence from a single-source study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2), 275–288.
47.
Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in online versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 230–239.
48.
Marsh, G. E., Price, B. J., & McFadden, A. C. (2000). An overview of online educational delivery applications. ERIC Document Reproductions [ED No. 444 476]
49.
McLoughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: Developing an online community of learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 231–243.
50.
Natale, R. D. (2002). Ensuring quality from a distance. Community College Week, 14(12), 4–5.
51.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Distance Education in higher Education Institutions U.S. Department of Education: Office of Educational Research.
52.
Oblinger, D. G., & Katz, R. N. (2000). Navigating the sea of 'E.' In R. N. Katz & D. G. Oblinger (Eds.), The 'E' is for everything: E-commerce, e-business, and e-learning in higher education: Vol. 2. Educause leadership strategies (pp. 1–10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Owston, R. D. (2000). Evaluating web-based learning environments: Strategies and insights. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(1), 79–87.
54.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher educationInstitute for Higher Education Policy: Washington, D.C.
55.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (2000). Quality on the line, benchmarks for success in internet-based distance educationInstitute for Higher Education Policy: Washington, D.C.
56.
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significance phenomenon North Carolina State University,Chapel Hill: Office of the Instructional Telecommunications.
57.
Sisson, S. D. (2002). Online instruction: Time to grow. Journal of International Medicine, 17, 574.
58.
Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instruction methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37–46.
59.
Speck, B. W. (2000). The academy, online classes, and the breach in ethics. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 73–81.
60.
Spooner, F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. Journal of Educational Research, 92(3), 132–140.
61.
Trief, E., Decker, L. M., & Ryan, D. J. (2004). Student satisfaction: A distance learning model for training teachers of students with visual impairments in New York state. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98(6), 367–372.
62.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Crook, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(2), 39–64.
63.
Wallhaus, R. A. (2000). E-learning: From institutions to providers, from student to learners. In R. N. Katz & D. G. Oblinger (Eds.), The 'E' is for everything: E-commerce, e-business, and e-learning in higher education: Vol. 2. Educause leadership strategies (pp. 21–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2000). Characteristics of student who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137–143.
65.
Waschull, S. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 143–147.
66.
Andrews, S., & Clementson, J. J. (1997). Active learning's effect upon pre-service teachers' attitudes toward inclusion. Unpublished manuscript.
67.
Antonak, R. F., & Larrivee, B. (1995). Psychometric analysis and revision of the Opinions Relative to Mainstreaming scale. Exceptional Children, 62, 139– 149.
68.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1996). Epistemological development in graduate and professional education. Review of Higher Education, 19(3), 283–304.
69.
Bishop, A., & Jones, P. (2003). “I never thought they would enjoy the fun of science just like ordinary children do:” Exploring science experiences with early years teacher training students and children with severe and profound learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 34–43.
70.
Bondy, E., & Brownell, M. T. (2004). Getting beyond the research to practice gap: Researching against the grain. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 47–56.
71.
Brownell, M. T., & Pajares, M. F. (1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 154–164.
72.
Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colon, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252.
73.
Brownell, M. T., Yeager, E. A., Sindelar, P. T., vanHover, S., & Riley, T. (2004). Teacher Learning Cohorts: A vehicle for supporting beginning teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 174– 189.
74.
Cook, B. G. (2002). Inclusive attitudes, strengths, and weaknesses of pre-service general educators enrolled in a curriculum infusion teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 262–277.
75.
Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. J. (2000). Teachers' attitudes toward their included students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 115–135.
76.
Englert, C. S., & Rozendal, M. S. (2004). A model of professional development in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 24–46.
77.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
78.
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Thousand, J. (2003). What do special educators need to know and be prepared to do for inclusive schooling to work?Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 42–50.
79.
Gabel, S. L. (2001). “I wash my face with dirty water”: Narratives of disability and pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 31–47.
80.
Glatthorn, A. A. (1990). Cooperative professional development: Facilitating the growth of the special education teacher and the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 29–34, 50.
81.
Goodman, J., & Fish, D. R. (1997). Against-the-grain teacher education: A study of coursework, field experience, and perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 96–107.
82.
Harriman, N., & Renew, F. C., Jr. (1996). Preparing classroom teachers to teach diverse learners in rural schools. In Rural Goals 2000: Building Programs that Work (ERIC RC#020 545).
83.
Harrington, H. L., Quinn-Leering, K., & Hodson, L. (1996). Written case analyses and critical reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25–37.
84.
Henning, M. B., & Mitchell, L. C. (2002). Preparing for inclusion. Child Study Journal, 32(1), 19–29.
85.
Hutchinson, N. L., & Martin, A. K. (1999). Fostering inclusive beliefs and practices during pre-service teacher education through communities of practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 234–250.
86.
Kolar, C., & Dickson, S. V. (2002). Pre-service general educators' perceptions of structured reflective logs as viable learning tools in a university course on inclusionary practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 395–406.
87.
Lesar, S., Benner, S. M., Habel, J., & Coleman, L. (1997). Preparing general education teachers for inclusive settings: A constructivist teacher education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 204–220.
88.
Levin, B., Hibbard, K., & Rock, T. (2002). Using problem-based learning as a tool for learning to teach students with special needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 278–290.
89.
McLeskey, J., & Ross, D. D. (2004). The politics of teacher education in the new millennium: Implications for special education teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 342–349.
90.
Munby, H., & Hutchinson, N. L. (1998). Using experience to prepare teachers for inclusive classrooms: Teacher education and the epistemology of practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 75–82.
91.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
92.
Pajares, M. F. (1993). Pre-service teachers' beliefs: A focus for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 25(2), 45–54.
93.
Peterson, M., & Beloin, K. S. (1998). Teaching the inclusive teacher: Restructuring the mainstreaming course in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 306–318.
94.
Ross, D. D., & Blanton, L. (2004). Inquiry communities in special education teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 15–23.
95.
Salisbury, C. L., & McGregor, G. (2002). The administrative climate and context of inclusive elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 68, 259–274.
96.
Scheurman, G. (1995). Constructivism, personal epistemology, and teacher education: Toward a social-developmental model of adult reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
97.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293–319.
98.
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
99.
Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well- defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 523–538.
100.
Schumm, J. S., Vaughn, S., Gordon, J., & Rothlein, L. (1994). General education teachers' beliefs, skills, and practices in planning for mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 22–37.
101.
Tait, K., & Purdie, N. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 47(1), 25–38.
102.
Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C. M., Tomchin, E. M., Eiss, N., Imbeau, M., & Landrum, M. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269–282.
103.
Trent, S. C., & Dixon, D. J. (2004). My eyes were opened: Tracing the conceptual change of pre-service teachers in a special education/multicultural education course. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 119–133.
104.
Udvari-Solner, A. (2003). Leading social change in collaborative and inclusive practice: One middle school's journey. Impact, 16(1), 20–21.
105.
Weiner, H. M. (2003). Effective inclusion: Professional development in the context of the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 12–18.
106.
Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
107.
York-Barr, J., Sommers, W. A., Ghere, G. S., & Montie, J. (2001). Reflective practice to improve schoolsThousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
