Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) is a well-established, thoroughly validated instructional model. In this article, we discuss the rationale and steps for implementing it. We also provide practical information for use in teaching and evaluating strategy instruction. This article is intended to guide teacher educators as they help future teachers develop a practical working knowledge of how to effectively implement strategy instruction in the classroom.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129–154.
2.
Dickson, S. V., Collins, V. L., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Metacognitive strategies: Instruction and curricular basics and implications. In D. Simmons & E. Kameenui (Eds.) What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs (pp. 361–380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning.The Journal of Special Education, 39, 19–33.
4.
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
5.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning Disabilities. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Murray, C., Goldstein, D. E., & Edgar, E. (1997). The employment and engagement status of high school graduates with learning disabilities through the first decade after graduation.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 151–160.
7.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pbu. L. No. 107–110, Stat. 1425 (2002).
8.
Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., & Associates. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
9.
Reid, R., & Lienemann, T. O. (2006). Strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. New York: Guilford.
10.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading. Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
11.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Instruction derived from the strategy deficit model: Overview of principles and procedures. In T. Scruggs & B. Wong (Eds.) Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 34–65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
13.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Data Tables for OSEP State Reported Data. http://Ideadata.org.
14.
Barnett, B., & Caffarella, R. (1992). The use of cohorts: A powerful way for addressing issues of diversity in preparation programs. Minneapolis, MN: University Council for Education Administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 627).
15.
Basom, M., Yerkes, D., Norris, C., & Barnett, B. (1995). Exploring cohorts: Effects on principal preparation and leadership practice. St. Louis, Missouri: Dansforth Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 387 857).
16.
Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colon, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education.Journal of Special Education, 384, 242–252.
17.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
18.
Graber, K. (1996). Influencing student beliefs: The design of a high impact teacher education program.Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 451–466.
19.
Hart, S. A. (1997). Interpersonal dynamics turn “group” into “team”. Electronic News, 43(2), 48.
20.
Maznevski, M. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members.Human Relations, 475, 53–75.
21.
Pohan, C. A., & Mathison, C. (1999). Dismantling defensiveness and resistance to diversity and social justice issues in teacher preparation.Action in Teacher Education, 201, 15–22.
22.
Radencich, M., Thompson, T., Anderson, N., & Ororpallo, K. (1998). The culture of cohorts: Preservice teacher education teams at a southeastern university in the United States.Journal of Education for Teaching, 242, 109–127.
23.
Ross, D., Hoppey, D., Halsall, S., McCallum, C., Hayes, S., & Hudson, R. (in press). Cohort use in teacher education: Benefits, barriers, and proposed solutions. Teacher Education and Practice.
24.
Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183–194.
25.
Tietel, L.Understanding and harnessing the power of the cohort model in preparing educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 66–85.
26.
Ukpopkodu, N. (2002). Breaking through preservice teachers' defensive dispositions in a multicultural education course: A reflective practice.Multicultural Education, 93, 25–33.
27.
Yerkes, D. M., Basom, M., Norris, C., & Barnett, B. (1995). Using Cohorts in the Development of Educational Learners. Vancouver, Canada: Association of Management, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 387 858).
