All educators must be prepared to meet the substantial instructional challenges that await them in 21st Century classrooms. Significant among these challenges will be the ability to improve the academic and behavioral performance of a more diverse and often impoverished student population within the context of an ever-expanding curriculum and an educational milieu that may provide fewer instructional resources and less educational support. To meet such challenges, all educators must work collaboratively to develop, implement, and evaluate effective teaching practices that can be applied feasibly and sustained over extensive time periods. Here, we have made a modest attempt to help one classroom teacher address some aspects of her impending instructional challenge. Using an alternating treatments design, we compared the effects of Response Cards, Numbered Heads Together, and Whole Group Question and Answer on 6th graders daily quiz scores and pretest-posttest performance in chemistry, and examined how each instructional intervention affected teacher questioning and student responding patterns in class. Implications are discussed for teachers, teacher educators, and educational consultants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antrim, D.S., Miller, A.D., & Rogers, W.L. (1996). Effective questioning: A comparison of oral questioning and write-on response cards. 22nd Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco .
2.
Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152-158.
3.
Barlow, D.H., & Hayes, S.C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
4.
Barlow, D.H., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1984). Clinical replication. In D. H. Barlow, S. C. Hayes, & R. Nelson, The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and education settings. (pp. 290-346). New York: Pergammon Press.
5.
Brophy, J.E. (1988). Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement: Potential implications for instruction of Chapter I students. Educational Psychologist, 23, 235-286.
6.
Brophy, J.E., & Evertson, C.M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook for research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
8.
Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-521.
9.
Carnine, D. (1996, June). Diverse learners and prevailing, emerging, and research-based educational approaches and their tools. (On line). Available from the National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
10.
Cavanaugh, R.A., Heward, W.L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403-406.
11.
Christensen, L., Epanchin, B.C., Harris, D., Rosselli, H., Smith, R.L., & Stoddard, ( 1996). Anatomy of six public school-university partnerships . Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 169-179.
12.
Coble, C.R., & Koballa, T.R. (1996). Science education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Hanbook for research on teacher education (pp. 459-484). New York: Macmillan.
13.
Education Commission of the States, (1996). Standards and education: A roadmap for state policymakers. (No. SI-96-3) . Denver, CO: Distribution Center, Author.
14.
Gardner III, R., Heward, W.L., & Grossi, T.A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
15.
Gersten, R., & Brengelman, S.U. (1996). The quest to translate research into classroom practice. Remedial and Special Educaton , 17, 67-74
16.
Graden, J., Thurlow, M.L., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1982). Academic engaged time and its relationship to learning: A review of the literature (Monograph 17) . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
17.
Gratz, D.B. (2000). High standards for whom? Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 681-687.
18.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J.C., & Hall, R.V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance . In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH : Merrill.
19.
Greenwood, C.R., & Maheady, L. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation ? Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 265-275.
20.
Hall, R.V., Delquadri, J.C., Greenwood, C.R., & Thurston, L., (1982). The importance of opportunity to respond in children's academic success. In E. B. Edgar, N. G. Haring, J. R. Jenkins , & C. G. Pios (Eds.), Mentally handicapped children: Education and training (pp. 107-140). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
21.
Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., Bentley, A., & Moore, J. (1995). Retention and treatment failure Classwide Peer Tutoring: Implications for further research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 399-414.
22.
Heward, W.L., Barbetta, P.M., Cavanaugh, R.A., & Grossi, T.A. (2000, March). A dozen common teaching mistakes.... and what to do instead. Workshop presentation, FredoniaCentral High School, Fredonia, New York.
23.
Heward, W.L., Gardner III, R., Cavanaugh, R.A., Courson, F.H., Grossi, T.A., & Barbetta, P.M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class: Using response cards to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28 (2), 4-10.
24.
Howey, K. (1996). Designing coherent and effective teacher education programs. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook for research on teacher education (pp. 143-169). New York: Macmillan.
25.
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative Learning (7th Ed.). San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers, Inc.
26.
Karge, B.D., Lasky, B., McCabe, M., & Robb, S.M. (1995). University and district collaborative support for beginning special education intern teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 38-51.
27.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Kemple, K.M., Hartle, L.C., Correa, V.I., & Fox, L. (1994). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: The development of a unified teacher education program in early childhood and early childhood special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 103-114.
29.
Koslin, B.L., Zeno, S., & Koslin, S. (1987). The DRP: An effectiveness measure in reading. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates .
30.
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., Harper, G.F., & Sacca, K. (1991). Heads Together: A peer-mediated option for improving the academic achievement of heterogeneous learning groups. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 25-33.
31.
Mallette, B., Maheady, L., & Harper, G.F. (1999). The effects of reciprocal peer coaching on preservice general educators' instruction of students with special learning needs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 201-216.
32.
Martella, R.C., Nelson, R., & Marchand-Martella, N.E. (1999). Research methods: Learning to become a critical research consumer. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Narayan, J.S., Heward, W.L., Gardner, R. III, Courson, F.H., & Omness, C. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 23, 483-490.
34.
Rindfuss, J.B., Al-Attrash, M., Morrison, H., & Heward, W.L. (1998, May). Using guided notes and response cards to improve quiz and exam scores in an eighth grade American history class. Paper presented at the 24th annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Orlando, FL.
35.
Rosenshine, B. (1980). How time is spent in elementary classrooms. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.). The appraisal of teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 28-56). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
36.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook for research on teaching (pp.376-391). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan .
37.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Skiba, R.J., & Peterson, R.L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 66, 335-347.
40.
Slavin, R.E. (1983). Student team learning: An overview and practical guide. Washington DC: National Education Association.
41.
Townsend, B.L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. ExceptionalChildren , 66, 381-391.
42.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163-172.
