Protective orders (POs) are a primary legal mechanism to safeguard victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) and reduce the risk of subsequent violence. Although POs have demonstrated effectiveness, scholarly attention to the legal consequences of PO violations remains limited. We systematically analyzed statutes governing first-time PO violations across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., using a comprehensive Westlaw search and supplementary legal resources. All jurisdictions address PO violations, and most classify a first-time violation as a misdemeanor. Penalties vary widely, ranging from 48 hours to 2.5 years of imprisonment and fines from $200 to $25,000; some states also require offenders to pay victim restitution and court fees. Policy reforms that promote greater equity, standardized statutory language, and improved coordination among courts, law enforcement, and victim services are critical to ensuring that POs function as reliable safeguards for IPV survivors nationwide.
BergerE.ScheideggerK. S. (2022). Sentence length and recidivism: A review of the research. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 35(1), 59–72.
6.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
7.
BouffardJ. A.MuftićL. R. (2007). An examination of the outcomes of various components of a coordinated community response to domestic violence by male offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 353–366.
8.
BroidyL.AlbrightD.DenmanK. (2016). Deterring future incidents of intimate partner violence: Does type of formal intervention matter?Violence Against Women, 22(9), 1113–1133.
9.
Burgess-ProctorA. (2003). Evaluating the efficacy of protection orders for victims of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(1), 33–54.
10.
Caballé-PérezM.Santos-HermosoJ.López-OssorioJ. J.Soria-VerdeM. Á.AmorP. J.González-ÁlvarezJ. L. (2024). Risk factors for multiple violations of protective orders in intimate partner violence against women. Violence & Victims, 39(1), 21–37.
11.
California Penal Code § 273.6.
12.
CarlsonM. J.HarrisS. D.HoldenG. W. (1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 205–226.
13.
CarlsonM. J. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of protective orders for victims of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(3–4), 1105–1127.
14.
CissnerA. B.LabriolaM.RempelM. (2015). Domestic violence courts: A multisite test of whether and how they change offender outcomes. Violence Against Women, 21(9), 1102–1122.
15.
Colorado Revised Statute Annotated § 18-6-803.5.
16.
Connecticut General Statute Annotated § 53a-223.
17.
CordierR.ChungD.Wilkes-GillanS.SpeyerR. (2021). The effectiveness of protection orders in reducing recidivism in domestic violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(4), 804–828.
18.
CoulterM.VandeWeerdC. (2009). Reducing domestic violence and other criminal recidivism: Effectiveness of a multilevel batterers intervention program. Violence and Victims, 24(2), 139–152.
19.
DeJongC.Burgess-ProctorA. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women, 12(1), 68–88.
20.
Delaware Code Annotated Title 11, § 1271A.
21.
District of Columbia Code Annotated § 16-1005.
22.
DouglasE. M.HinesD. A. (2011). The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473–485.
23.
DuganL.NaginD. S.RosenfeldR. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law & Society Review, 37(1), 169–198.
24.
DurfeeA. (2021). The use of structural intersectionality as a method to analyze how the domestic violence civil protective order process replicates inequality. Violence Against Women, 27(5), 639–665.
25.
DurfeeA.MessingJ. T. (2012). Characteristics related to protection order use among victims of intimate partner violence. Violence against Wwomen, 18(6), 701–710.
26.
FischerK.RoseM. (1995). When “enough is enough”: Battered women’s decision making around court orders of protection. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 414–429.
27.
Florida Statute Annotated § 741.31.
28.
FreemanJ. (1973). The origins of the women’s liberation movement. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 792–811.
29.
GarnerJ. H.MaxwellC. D.LeeJ. (2021). The specific deterrent effects of criminal sanctions for intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 111, 227–271.
30.
Georgia Code Annotated § 16-5-95.
31.
GilchristG.MunozJ. T.EastonC. J. (2015). Should we reconsider anger management when addressing physical intimate partner violence perpetration by alcohol abusing males? A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 124–132.
32.
Hawaii Revised Statutes Annotated § 586-11 (2023).
33.
HayesB. E. (2018). Repeat victimization among intimate partner violence victims: The impact of guardianship. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 138–159.
34.
HefnerM. K.MillerS. L.Fleury-SteinerR. E. (2022). Legal consciousness and intimate partner violence survivors’ perceptions of protection order violations. Journal of Family Violence, 37(8), 1379–1390.
35.
HerreraM. J.AmorP. J. (2024). Protective orders for male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Differences between violators and non-violators. Violence Against Women, 30(3–4), 911–933.
36.
HolmesS. C.MaxwellC. D.CattaneoL. B.BellucciB. A.SullivanT. P. (2022). Criminal protection orders among women victims of intimate partner violence: Women’s experiences of court decisions, processes, and their willingness to engage with the system in the future. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16253–NP16276.
37.
HoltV. L.KernicM. A.WolfM. E.RivaraF. P. (2003). Do protection orders affect the likelihood of future partner violence and injury?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 16–21.
38.
Idaho Code Annotated § 39-6312.
39.
Illinois Statutes Chapter 720 § 5/12-3.2.
40.
Indiana Code Annotated § 35-46-1-15.1.
41.
Iowa Code Annotated § 39-6312.
42.
Iowa Code Annotated § 664A.7.
43.
Kansas Statute Annotated § 21-5924.
44.
Kentucky Revised Statute Annotated § 532.090.
45.
KethineniS.BeichnerD. (2009). A comparison of civil and criminal orders of protection as remedies for domestic violence victims in a Midwestern county. Journal of Family Violence, 24(5), 311–321.
46.
KothariC. L.RhodesK. V.WileyJ. A.FinkJ.OverholtS.DichterM. E.MarcusS. C. (2012). Protection orders protect against assault and injury: A longitudinal study of police-involved women victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2845–2868.
47.
LeeJ.KanaboshiN.PetlakhK. (2023). Domestic violence protection orders for teen dating violence: An analysis of state laws and practices. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2789–2807.
48.
LeemisR. W.FriarN.KhatiwadaS.ChenM. S.KresnowM.SmithS. G.CaslinS.BasileK. C. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 report on intimate partner violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. T. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper?Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348.
51.
Louisiana Statute Annotated § 14:79.
52.
McFarlaneJ.MalechaA.GistJ.WatsonK.BattenE.HallI.SmithS. (2004). Increasing the Safety-Promoting Behaviors of Abused Women: In this study, a telephone intervention for victims of intimate-partner violence showed efficacy for 18 months. The American Journal of Nursing, 104(3), 40–50.
53.
Maine Revised Statute Title 19-A, § 4113.
54.
Maryland Code Annotated Family Law § 4-509.
55.
Massachusetts Gen. Laws Annotated Chapter 209A, § 7.
56.
MessingJ. T.Bagwell-GrayM. E.Ward-LasherA.DurfeeA. (2021). ‘Not bullet proof’: The complex choice not to seek a civil protection order for intimate partner violence. International Review of Victimology, 27(2), 173–195.
57.
MessingJ. T.VegaS.DurfeeA. (2017). Protection order use among Latina survivors of intimate partner violence. Feminist Criminology, 12(3), 199–223.
58.
Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated § 600.2950.
59.
Minnesota Statute Annotated § 609.748.
60.
Mississippi Code Annotated § 93-21-21.
61.
Missouri Annotated Statute § 455.085.
62.
MoffattS.PoyntonS. (2007). The deterrent effect of penalties for drink-driving in NSW. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 103, 1–16.
63.
Montana Code Annotated § 45-5-626.
64.
Nebraska Revised Statute Annotated §42-924.
65.
Nevada Revised Statute Annotated § 33.100.
66.
New Hampshire Revised Statute Annotated § 173-B:9.
67.
New Jersey Statute Annotated § 2C:29-9.
68.
New Mexico Statute Annotated § 40-13-6.
69.
New York Family Court § 847.
70.
New York Penal § 215.51(b); (c); (d).
71.
North Carolina General Statute Annotated § 50B-4.1.
PalmerJ. E.RennerL. M.GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A. (2016). Does type of child risk affect whether mothers seek assistance for intimate partner violence from civil or criminal court?Violence Against Women, 22(4), 474–495.
78.
Pennsylvania Statute and Consolidated Statute Annotated §6113, §6114.
79.
Rhode Island General Laws Annotated § 8-8.1-3.
80.
RichardsT. N.JenningsW. G.TomsichE.GoverA. (2014). A 10-year analysis of rearrests among a cohort of domestic violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 29(6), 887–906.
81.
RuhlandE.HolmesB.PetkusA. (2020). The role of fines and fees on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(10), 1244–1263.
82.
RussellB. (2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552.
83.
SchechterS. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. South End Press.
84.
ShahN. D.NguyenG.WagmanJ. A.GlikD. C. (2023). Factors influencing the use of domestic violence restraining orders in Los Angeles. Violence Against Women, 29(9), 1604–1622.
85.
SidorskyK.SchillerW. J. (2023). Inequality across state lines: How policymakers have failed domestic violence victims in the United States. Cambridge University Press.
86.
South Carolina Code Annotated § 20-4-60.
87.
South Dakota Codified Laws § 25-10-13.
88.
StoeverJ. K. (2014). Enjoining abuse: The case for indefinite domestic violence protection orders. Vanderbilt Law Review, 67, 1015–1098.
89.
StrandS. (2012). Using a restraining order as a protective risk management strategy to prevent intimate partner violence. Police Practice and Research, 13(3), 254–266.
90.
Utah Code Annotated § 76-5-108.
91.
Vermont Statute Annotated Title 13, § 1030.
92.
Virginia Code Annotated § 16.1-253.2.
93.
Washington Revised Code Annotated § 7.105.450.
94.
West Virginia Code Annotated § 48-27-903.
95.
Wisconsin Statute Annotated § 813.12.
96.
WoernerJ.SullivanT. P.CattaneoL. B.BackesB. L.BellucciB. (2024). Criminal orders of protection for survivors of intimate partner violence, future system engagement, and well-being: Understanding the importance of prior abusive relationships. Victims & Offenders, 19(6), 1084–1103.
97.
WolfM. E.HoltV. L.KernicM. A.RivaraF. P. (2000). Who gets protection orders for intimate partner violence?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 286–291.
98.
WrightC. V.JohnsonD. M. (2012). Encouraging legal help seeking for victims of intimate partner violence: The therapeutic effects of the civil protection order. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25(6), 675–681.
99.
Wyoming Statute Annotated § 6-4-404.
100.
ZarlingA.RussellD. (2022). A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and the Duluth Model classes for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(4), 326–338.
