Policies throughout the U.S. respond to the well-documented relationship between housing instability and intimate partner violence (IPV), but in practice survivors’ needs often remain unmet. In this community-based participatory study, an interdisciplinary research team interviewed 41 survivors seeking emergency housing assistance at the sole public gateway for homeless families in Washington, D.C. Only four survivors received immediate assistance, and half were determined ineligible for services. While some felt genuinely supported, many survivors faced long wait times and experienced shaming and demoralizing treatment that exacerbated their risk. We discuss the influence of contextual factors including discriminatory narratives surrounding who deserves help, and a lack of system resources driving a scarcity mindset. Recommendations include a sustained, critical, and collaborative approach to evaluating local implementation of ostensibly supportive policies.
BakerC. K.BillhardtK. A.WarrenJ.RollinsC.GlassN. E. (2010). Domestic violence, housing instability, and homelessness: A review of housing policies and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(6), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.07.005
2.
BeattyP. (2004). The dynamics of cognitive interviewing. In R. M. Groves, G. Kalton, J. N. K. Rao, N. Schwarz, C. Skinner, S. Presser, J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin & E. Singer (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 45–66). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2010). Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334282
5.
CattaneoL. B.StylianouA. M.HargroveS.GoodmanL. A.GebhardK. T.CurbyT. W. (2020). Survivor-centered practice and survivor empowerment: Evidence from a research‒practitioner partnership. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220935196
6.
CloughA.DraughonJ. E.Njie-CarrV.RollinsC.GlassN. (2014). Having housing made everything else possible’: Affordable, safe and stable housing for women survivors of violence. Qualitative Social Work, 13(5), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013503003
Eligibility for Services Within the Continuum of Care, DC Code § 4-753.02. (2015).
9.
EpsteinD.GoodmanL. A. (2019). Discounting women: Doubting domestic violence survivors’ credibility and dismissing their experiences. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167, 399–461.
GezinskiL. B.Gonzalez-PonsK. M. (2019). Unlocking the door to safety and stability: Housing barriers for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), 8338–8357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519851792
12.
GoodmanL. A.CattaneoL. B.ThomasK.WoulfeJ.ChongS. K.SmythK. F. (2015). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: Development and validation of the Measure of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038318
13.
Homeless Services Planning and Coordinating Committee. (2024). Homelessness in metropolitan Washington: Results and analysis from the annual point-in-time (PIT) count of persons experiencing homelessness. https://www.mwcog.org/homelessnessreport/.
14.
Homeless Services Reform Amendment Act of 2017, DC Code § 22-65. (2017).
KeefeR.HahnS. A. (2021). Policy roles in promoting affordable housing for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1317–1336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913629
17.
KerigP. K. (2019). Enhancing resilience among providers of trauma-informed care: A curriculum for protection against secondary traumatic stress among non-mental health professionals. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(5), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1468373
18.
KleinL. B.ChesworthB. R.Howland-MyersJ. R.RizoC. F.MacyR. J. (2021). Housing interventions for intimate partner violence survivors: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 22(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019836284
19.
KulkarniS. J.BellH.RhodesD. M. (2012). Back to basics: Essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212437137
20.
KulkarniS. J.NotarioH. (2024). Trapped in housing insecurity: Socioecological barriers to housing access experienced by intimate partner violence survivors from marginalized communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23052
21.
MessingJ. T.CampbellJ. C.BrownS.PatchellB.AndroffD. K.WilsonJ. S. (2014). The association between protective actions and homicide risk: Findings from the Oklahoma lethality assessment study. Violence and Victims, 29(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00013
22.
MessingJ. T.ThomasK. A.Ward-LasherA.JohnsonJ. (2021). Survivors achieving stable housing: Implementation, challenges, and lessons learned. Social Work, 66(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa046
23.
National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2023). 17th Annual domestic violence counts report.
24.
National Network to End Domestic Violence. (n.d.). HEARTH Act 2009 and domestic violence victims and programs. [Fact Sheet].
25.
O’CampoP.DaoudN.Hamilton-WrightS.DunnJ. (2016). Conceptualizing housing instability: Experiences with material and psychological instability among women living with partner violence. Housing Studies, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1021768
26.
ParkerE. M.GielenA. C.CastilloR.WebsterD. (2015). Safety strategy use among women seeking temporary protective orders: The relationship between violence experienced, strategy effectiveness, and risk perception. Violence and Victims, 30(4), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00003
27.
PavaoJ.AlvarezJ.BaumrindN.InduniM.KimerlingR. (2007). Intimate partner violence and housing instability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.008
SpencerC. M.StithS. M. (2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101
30.
StylianouA. M.PichC. (2021). Beyond domestic violence shelter: Factors associated with housing placements for survivors exiting emergency shelters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP9440–NP9462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519858393
31.
SweetP. L. (2021). The politics of surviving: How women navigate domestic violence and its aftermath (1st ed.). University of California Press.
32.
ThomasK.MessingJ. T.Ward-LasherA.BonesA. (2020). No easy decisions: Developing an evidence-informed process to allocate housing choice vouchers to survivors of intimate partner violence. Housing Policy Debate, 30(5), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1755336
VelonisA. J.DaoudN.MathesonF.Woodhall-MelnikJ.Hamilton-WrightS.O’CampoP. (2015). Strategizing safety: Theoretical frameworks to understand women’s decision making in the face of partner violence and social inequities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3321–3345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515598953
35.
WallerB. Y.HarrisJ.QuinnC. R. (2022). Caught in the crossroad: An intersectional examination of African American women intimate partner violence survivors’ help seeking. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 23(4), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021991303
