When Policy Is Not Enough: Intimate Partner Violence Survivors’ Search for Housing Assistance in Washington,D.C.

Abstract

Policies throughout the U.S. respond to the well-documented relationship between housing instability and intimate partner violence (IPV), but in practice survivors’ needs often remain unmet. In this community-based participatory study, an interdisciplinary research team interviewed 41 survivors seeking emergency housing assistance at the sole public gateway for homeless families in Washington, D.C. Only four survivors received immediate assistance, and half were determined ineligible for services. While some felt genuinely supported, many survivors faced long wait times and experienced shaming and demoralizing treatment that exacerbated their risk. We discuss the influence of contextual factors including discriminatory narratives surrounding who deserves help, and a lack of system resources driving a scarcity mindset. Recommendations include a sustained, critical, and collaborative approach to evaluating local implementation of ostensibly supportive policies.

Keywords

intimate partner violence housing policy homelessness discrimination domestic violence policy implementation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

C. K.

Billhardt

K. A.

Warren

Rollins

Glass

N. E.

(2010). Domestic violence, housing instability, and homelessness: A review of housing policies and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(6), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.07.005

Beatty

(2004). The dynamics of cognitive interviewing. In R. M. Groves, G. Kalton, J. N. K. Rao, N. Schwarz, C. Skinner, S. Presser, J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin & E. Singer (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 45–66). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cattaneo

L. B.

Goodman

L. A.

(2010). Through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence: The relationship between empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334282

Cattaneo

L. B.

Stylianou

A. M.

Hargrove

Goodman

L. A.

Gebhard

K. T.

Curby

T. W.

(2020). Survivor-centered practice and survivor empowerment: Evidence from a research‒practitioner partnership. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220935196

Clough

Draughon

J. E.

Njie-Carr

Rollins

Glass

(2014). Having housing made everything else possible’: Affordable, safe and stable housing for women survivors of violence. Qualitative Social Work, 13(5), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013503003

Desmond

(2023). Poverty, by America. The Crown Publishing Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmu/detail.action?docID=7206109 .

Eligibility for Services Within the Continuum of Care, DC Code § 4-753.02. (2015).

Epstein

Goodman

L. A.

(2019). Discounting women: Doubting domestic violence survivors’ credibility and dismissing their experiences. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 167, 399–461.

10.

Gallaher

(2024, October 10). DC public housing agency is making halting progress, but much more needs to be done. Greater Greater Washington. https://ggwash.org/view/97236/dcs-public-housing-agency-is-making-halting-progress-but-much-more-needs-to-be-done#:∼:text=The%20HUD%20audit%20described%20DC's,the%20US%E2%80%94only%2076%25.

11.

Gezinski

L. B.

Gonzalez-Pons

K. M.

(2019). Unlocking the door to safety and stability: Housing barriers for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), 8338–8357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519851792

12.

Goodman

L. A.

Cattaneo

L. B.

Thomas

Woulfe

Chong

S. K.

Smyth

K. F.

(2015). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: Development and validation of the Measure of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038318

13.

Homeless Services Planning and Coordinating Committee. (2024). Homelessness in metropolitan Washington: Results and analysis from the annual point-in-time (PIT) count of persons experiencing homelessness. https://www.mwcog.org/homelessnessreport/.

14.

Homeless Services Reform Amendment Act of 2017, DC Code § 22-65. (2017).

15.

Jang

Flynn

(2024, October 25). Families sue D.C. for ending housing aid in unprecedented case. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/10/25/dc-rapid-rehousing-lawsuit/.

16.

Keefe

Hahn

S. A.

(2021). Policy roles in promoting affordable housing for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1317–1336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220913629

17.

Kerig

P. K.

(2019). Enhancing resilience among providers of trauma-informed care: A curriculum for protection against secondary traumatic stress among non-mental health professionals. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(5), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1468373

18.

Klein

L. B.

Chesworth

B. R.

Howland-Myers

J. R.

Rizo

C. F.

Macy

R. J.

(2021). Housing interventions for intimate partner violence survivors: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 22(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019836284

19.

Kulkarni

S. J.

Bell

Rhodes

D. M.

(2012). Back to basics: Essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212437137

20.

Kulkarni

S. J.

Notario

(2024). Trapped in housing insecurity: Socioecological barriers to housing access experienced by intimate partner violence survivors from marginalized communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.23052

21.

Messing

J. T.

Campbell

J. C.

Brown

Patchell

Androff

D. K.

Wilson

J. S.

(2014). The association between protective actions and homicide risk: Findings from the Oklahoma lethality assessment study. Violence and Victims, 29(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00013

22.

Messing

J. T.

Thomas

K. A.

Ward-Lasher

Johnson

(2021). Survivors achieving stable housing: Implementation, challenges, and lessons learned. Social Work, 66(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa046

23.

National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2023). 17^th Annual domestic violence counts report.

24.

National Network to End Domestic Violence. (n.d.). HEARTH Act 2009 and domestic violence victims and programs. [Fact Sheet].

25.

O’Campo

Daoud

Hamilton-Wright

Dunn

(2016). Conceptualizing housing instability: Experiences with material and psychological instability among women living with partner violence. Housing Studies, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1021768

26.

Parker

E. M.

Gielen

A. C.

Castillo

Webster

(2015). Safety strategy use among women seeking temporary protective orders: The relationship between violence experienced, strategy effectiveness, and risk perception. Violence and Victims, 30(4), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00003

27.

Pavao

Alvarez

Baumrind

Induni

Kimerling

(2007). Intimate partner violence and housing instability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.008

28.

Solum

(2022, November 8). Income needed to pay rent in the largest U.S cities - 2022 edition. Smartasset. https://smartasset.com/data-studies/income-needed-to-pay-rent-in-largest-us-cities-2022.

29.

Spencer

C. M.

Stith

S. M.

(2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101

30.

Stylianou

A. M.

Pich

(2021). Beyond domestic violence shelter: Factors associated with housing placements for survivors exiting emergency shelters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17–18), NP9440–NP9462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519858393

31.

Sweet

P. L.

(2021). The politics of surviving: How women navigate domestic violence and its aftermath (1st ed.). University of California Press.

32.

Thomas

Messing

J. T.

Ward-Lasher

Bones

(2020). No easy decisions: Developing an evidence-informed process to allocate housing choice vouchers to survivors of intimate partner violence. Housing Policy Debate, 30(5), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1755336

33.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2023, January). Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2022 (VAWA 2022). Housing Rights Subpart. https://www.justice.gov/crt/violence-against-women-act-reauthorization-act-2022-vawa-2022-housing-rights-subpart

34.

Velonis

A. J.

Daoud

Matheson

Woodhall-Melnik

Hamilton-Wright

O’Campo

(2015). Strategizing safety: Theoretical frameworks to understand women’s decision making in the face of partner violence and social inequities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3321–3345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515598953

35.

Waller

B. Y.

Harris

Quinn

C. R.

(2022). Caught in the crossroad: An intersectional examination of African American women intimate partner violence survivors’ help seeking. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 23(4), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021991303

36.

The Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless (2017). The final homeless services reform amendment act: Where we stand. https://www.legalclinic.org/the-final-homeless-services-reform-amendment-act-where-we-stand/.

37.

Wiley

(2019). Implementing domestic violence policy: When accountability trumps mission. Affilia, 35(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919894649