Global Positioning System Monitoring of High-Risk Sex Offenders: Implementation Challenges and Lessons Learned

Abstract

Agencies incorporating new technology inevitably face challenges in the implementation process. In response to the passage of Proposition 83, which mandated lifelong supervision of people convicted of sex offenses in California, San Diego County initiated a pilot program assessing Global Positioning System (GPS) monitoring of such offenders considered high risk for reoffending. Using interviews of parole agents and administrators, parole agent records of supervision, and GPS monitoring data, we assess the challenges and lessons learned from the program which help inform the current policy context of electronic monitoring. Results show that rigorous GPS supervision involves substantial workload and resource increases for parole agencies, and may not be appropriate for all individuals convicted of sex offenses. The ethical and legal challenges of electronic monitoring, more generally, require further attention. The future of GPS monitoring will depend on how programs are implemented and resources are managed, as well as how ethical issues are addressed.

Keywords

community corrections GPS sex offenders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

G. S.

Freeman

B. C.

(2011). Examining GPS monitoring alerts triggered by sex offenders: The divergence of legislative goals and practical application in community corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 175-182.

Bales

Mann

Blomberg

Gaes

Barrick

Dhungaga

McManus

(2010). A quantitative and qualitative assessment of electronic monitoring (Final Report Submitted to the National Institute of Justice for Grant 2007-IJ-CX-0017). Tallahassee: The Florida State University.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.

Boyd

J. H.

(2007). How to stop a predator: The rush to enact mandatory sex offender residency restrictions and why states should abstain. Oregon Law Review, 86, 219.

Brown

T. M.

McCabe

S. A.

Wellford

C. F.

(2007). Global positioning system (GPS) technology for community supervision: Lessons learned. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

Budd

K. M.

Mancini

(2017). Public perceptions of GPS monitoring for convicted sex offenders: Opinions on effectivenesss of electronic monitoring to reduce sexual recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1335-1353.

Bulman

(2013, February 26). History of GPS monitoring policies in California. National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/history-gps-monitoring-policies-california

Bülow

(2014). Electronic monitoring of offenders: An ethical review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 505-518.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2008). CDCR completes GPS implementation for high risk sex offenders on parole. Retrieved from https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/news/2008/04/30/cdcr-completes-gps

10.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2010). Sex offender supervision and GPS monitoring task force: Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/News/docs/Sex_Offender_and_GPSTask_Force_Report.pdf, October.

11.

Center for Sex Offender Management. (n.d.). Understanding sex offenders: An Introductory Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.csom.org/train/etiology/index.html.

12.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2016). 2015 outcome evaluation report: An examination of offenders released in fiscal year 2010-11. Office of Research. Retrieved from http://www.antoniocasella.eu/nume/California_aug16.pdf

13.

Clarke

(2017, May 5). Vigilantes assault, rob and murder registered sex offenders. Prison Legal News, p. 30.

14.

DeMichele

Payne

(2009). Offender supervision with electronic monitoring: A user’s guide. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

15.

Dierenfeldt

Carson

J. V.

(2017). Examining the influence of Jessica’s Law on reported forcible rape: A time-series analysis. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28, 87-101.

16.

Dourish

(2014). Technologies of presence and accountability. Retrieved from mundanetechnologies.com

17.

Elzinga

Nijboer

J. A.

(2006). Probation supervision through GPS. European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 14, 366-381.

18.

English

(1998). The containment approach: An aggressive strategy for the community management of adult sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 218-235.

19.

Gies

Gainey

Healy

(2016). Monitoring high-risk sex offenders with GPS. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(1), 1-20.

20.

Gies

S. V.

Gainey

Cohen

Healy

Duplantier

Yeide

. . .Hopps

(2012). Monitoring high-risk sex offenders with GPS technology: An evaluation of the California Supervision Program—Final report. Bethesda, ND: Development Services Group.

21.

Gies

S. V.

Gainey

Cohen

M. I.

Healy

Yeide

Beckleman

Bobnis

(2013). Monitoring high-risk gang offenders with GPS technology: An evaluation of the California Supervision Program Final Report. Bethesda, ND: Development Services Group.

22.

Gilna

Zoukis

(2017). Electronic monitoring becomes more widespread, but problems persist. Prison Legal News, October, p. 23.

23.

Griffin

Stitt

B. G.

(2010). Random activities theory: The case for “black swan” criminology. Critical Criminology, 18, 57-72.

24.

Hansen

R. K.

Thornton

(1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessment for sex offenders 1999-02. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

25.

Hansen

R. K.

Thornton

(2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

26.

Henne

Troshynski

(2013). Suspect subjects: Affects of bodily regulation. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 2, 110-112.

27.

Hermann

Williams

(2016). September 5. Outgoing police chief decries district’s “broken” criminal justice system. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/lanier-exits-with-rebuke-of-the-districts-criminal-justice-system/2016/09/05/3fde324e-7108-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html?utm_term=.42dc6d3bd551

28.

Homant

R. J.

Demercurio

M. A.

(2009). Intermediate sanctions in probation officers and sentencing recommendations: Consistency, net widening, and net repairing. Prison Journal an International Forum on Incarceratio, 89, 426-439.

29.

Hunkeler

(2016). New generation of EM technology: Soon too many sensors? Criminal Justice Research Review, January/February, pp. 35-38.

30.

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2008). Tracking sex offenders with electronic monitoring technology: Implications and practical uses for law enforcement. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/pdf/IACPSexOffenderElecMonitoring.pdf

31.

Levenson

J. S.

Cotter

L. P.

(2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49-66.

32.

Levenson

J. S.

D’Amora

D. A.

(2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 168-199.

33.

Lofstrom

Martin

(2015). Public safety realignment: Impacts so far. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

34.

Meloy

Boatwright

Curtis

(2013). Views from the top and bottom: Lawmakers and practitioners discuss sex offender laws. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 616-638.

35.

Omori

M. K.

Turner

S. F.

(2015). Assessing the cost of electronically monitoring high-risk sex offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 873-894.

36.

Padgett

K. G.

Bales

W. D.

Blomberg

T. D.

(2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 61-91.

37.

Quinn

J. F.

Forsyth

C. J.

Mullen-Quinn

(2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215-232.

38.

Sachwald

(2007). Electronic monitoring of sex offenders. Presentation for the national legislative briefing on sex offender management policy. Retrieved from http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/pubsafety/Sachwald.pdf

39.

Sacks

Sainato

V. A.

Ackerman

A. R.

(2015). Sentenced to pretrial detention: A study of bail decisions and outcomes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 661-681.

40.

Simonson

(2017). Bail nullification. Michigan Law Review, 115, 585.

41.

Smith

S. M.

Omori

M. K.

Turner

Jannetta

(2012). Assessing the earned discharge pilot project: The importance of context, capacity, and content. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 381-408.

42.

St. John

(2013, March 30). Tests found major flaws in parolee GPS monitoring devices. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ff-gps-monitors-20130331,0,2486955.story

43.

St. John

(2014, December 15). Sex offender had GPS bracelet removed and went unmonitored. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-slayings-gps-20141216-story.html

44.

Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole and Middle Tennessee State University. (2007). Monitoring Tennessee’s sex offenders using global positioning systems: A project evaluation. Nashville: State of Tennessee, Board of Probation and Parole.

45.

Tewey

J. F.

(2005, December 31). Task force to study criminal offender monitoring by global positioning systems: Final report to the governor and the general assembly. Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services. Retrieved from http://dlslibrary.state.md.us/publications/exec/dpscs/2005_2504.pdf

46.

Thompson

(2014, November 5). Study: Sex-offender GPS no panacea against crime. The Washington Times. Retrieved from https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/5/sex-offender-gps-no-panacea-for-deterring-crime/

47.

Turner

Chamberlain

A. W.

Jannetta

Hess

(2015). Does GPS improve recidivism among high risk offenders? Outcomes for California’s GPS pilot for high risk sex offender parolees. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research Policy and Practice, 10, 1-28.

48.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2016, August 18) Memorandum to the Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons: Reducing the use of private prisons. Washington, DC: Office of the Deputy Attorney General.

49.

Vetterkind

(2018). Bad cell signal? If you wear a GPS ankle bracelet, It can send you back to jail. The Crime Report. Retrieved from https://thecrimereport.org/2018/03/09/254851/

50.

Williams

(2015, March 30). The high cost of calling the imprisoned. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/31/us/steep-costs-of-inmate-phone-calls-are-under-scrutiny.html

51.

Wilson

J. A.

Davis

R. C.

(2006). Good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 303-338.