The contemporary crime control policy arena is one in which many states and the federal government are passing increasingly punitive legislation authorizing, and often, requiring electronic monitoring of sex offenders. This article reviews exploratory legal data on relevant state codes of all 50 states in the United States. The authors review state statutes regulating the electronic monitoring of sex offenders to identify the characteristics of the legislation, the necessity of (and budgetary support for) the laws, and the implications for probation and parole agencies and officers. Eight patterns are identified through the content analysis of recent legislation regarding electronic monitoring of sex offenders. Policy implications are identified.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, §§ 101-155, 120 Stat. 587 (2006).
2.
Babbie, E. ( 2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson-Wadsworth . Baerga-Buffler, M., & Johnson, J.L. (2006). Sex offender management in the federal probation and pre-trial services systems. Federal Probation, 70(1), 13-17.
3.
Bazemore, G., Burney, L., & Dooley, M. ( 2000). Mobilizing social support and building relationships: Broadening correctional and rehabilitative agendas. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4(4), 10-21.
4.
Berg, B.L. ( 2005). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. ( 2000). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 312-329.
6.
Bryne, J.M., & Taxman, F.S. ( 2006). Crime control strategies and community change-Reframing the surveillance vs. treatment debate. Federal Probation, 70(1), 3-12.
7.
Button, D.M., & Payne, B.K. ( 2008). Training child protective services workers about domestic violence: Needs, strategies, and barriers. Children and Youth Services Review. Prepublished August 27, 2008; DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.08.011
8.
Craig, L.A., Browne, K.D., Stinger, I., & Beech, A. ( 2005). Sexual recidivism: A review of static, dynamic, and actuarial predictors. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(1), 65-84.
9.
Crowe, A., Sydney, L., & Bancroft, P. ( 2000). Offender supervision with electronic monitoring: A user’s guide. Lexington, KY: American Probation and Parole Association.
10.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, 313-338.
11.
Downing, H. ( 2006, October). The emergence of global positioning satellite (GPS) systems in correctional applications. Corrections Today Magazine, 68(6), 42-45.
12.
Durling, C. ( 2006). Never going home: Does it make us safer? Does it make sense? Sex offenders, residency restrictions, and reforming risk management law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 317-363.
13.
Elrod, P., & Brown, M.P. ( 1996). Predicting public support for electronic house arrest: Results from a New York county survey. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 461-473.
14.
English, K. ( 1998). The containment approach: An aggressive strategy for the community management of adult sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 218-235.
15.
Erez, E., Ibarra, P.R., & Lurie, N.A. ( 2004). Electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases-A study of two bilateral programs. Federal Probation, 68(1), 15-20.
16.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). Crime in the United States, 2005: Uniform crime reports. Retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/
Greenfeld, L.A. ( 1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
22.
Heilbrun, K., Nezu, C.M., Keeney, M., Chung, S., & Wasserman, A.L. (1998). Sexual offending: Linking assessment, intervention, and decision making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 138-174.
Kilpatrick, D.G., Edmunds, C.N., & Seymour, A.K. ( 1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center & Medical University of South Carolina.
25.
Koss, M.P. ( 1993). Rape: Scope, impact, interventions, and public policy . American Psychological Association, 48, 1062-1069.
26.
LaFond, J.Q. ( 1998). The costs of enacting a sexual predator law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 468-504.
27.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. ( 2005). The effect of Megan’s law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49-66.
28.
Mair, G. ( 2005). Electronic monitoring in England and Wales: Evidence based or not? Criminal Justice, 5, 257-277.
29.
Martin, C., Lurigio, A.J., & Olson, D.E. ( 2003). An examination of rearrests and reincarcerations among discharged day reporting center clients. Federal Probation , 67(1), 24-31.
30.
McAlinden, A-M. ( 2006). Managing risk: From regulation to the reintegration of sexual offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 197-218.
31.
Meloy, M.L. ( 2006). Sex offense and the men who commit them. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
32.
Padgett, K., Bales, W., & Blomberg, T. ( 2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(1), 61-92.
33.
Payne, B.K., DeMichele, M., & Button, D.M. ( 2008). Understanding the monitoring of sex offenders: Background and implications. Corrections Compendium, 33(1), 1-5.
34.
Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R. ( 1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 422, 149-163.
35.
Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2000). Electronic monitoring: Philosophical, systemic, and political issues. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31(3/4), 93-111.
36.
Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2005). Family violence & criminal justice: A life-course approach (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
37.
Petrunik, M. ( 2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex offender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45(1) 43-72.
38.
Preston, L. ( 2003). The sexual assault nurse examiner and the Rape Crisis Center advocate: A necessary partnership. Topics in Emergency Medicine, 25, 242-247.
39.
Putnam, F.W. ( 2003). Ten-year research update review: Child sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 269-278.
40.
Quinn, J.F., Forsyth, C.J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215-232.
41.
Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 215-237.
42.
Resick, P.A. ( 1993). The psychological impact of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 223-255.
43.
Sample, L.L., & Kadleck, C. ( 2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 40-62.
44.
Schafran, L.H. ( 1996). Topics for our times: Rape is a major public health issue . American Journal of Public Health, 86(1), 15-17.
45.
Schwitzgebel, R., Schwitzgebel, R., Pahnke, W., & Hurd, W. ( 1967). A program of research in behavioral electronic. Behavioral Science, 9, 233-238.
46.
Taxman, F.S. ( 2002). Supervision-Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness . Federal Probation, 66(2), 14-27.
47.
Visher, C.A., Winterfield, L., & Coggeshall, M.B. (2005). Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 295-316.
48.
Vollum, S., & Hale, C. ( 2002). Electronic monitoring: A research review. Corrections Compendium, 27(7), 1-4, 23-27.
49.
Winkler, M. ( 1993, July-August). Walking prisons: The developing technology of electronic controls. Futurist, 34-49.
