Although drug courts were intended to reduce the justice system involvement of drug offenders, a recent study found evidence that drug courts were associated with increased (rather than decreased) arrests for minor misdemeanor drug offenses (Lilley, 2017; Walsh, 2011). However, the previous study did not utilize an equivalent comparison group and may have relied on a large sample size to generate findings. The current study tested the robustness of those findings by analyzing only cities with over 50,000 population, including four additional years of data, and utilizing a more equivalent comparison group that was propensity-matched to reduce the possibility that a preexisting difference may have generated higher arrest outcomes among drug court jurisdictions. Net-widening, arrest, and crime challenges and implications for drug court policies and law enforcement roles are also discussed.
AllisonP. (2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
2.
AnglinD.SpeckartG. (1988). Narcotics use and crime: A multisample, multimethod analysis. Criminology, 26, 197-233.
3.
BelenkoS. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University, New York, NY.
4.
BelenkoS. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review (2001 update). New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
5.
BowersJ. (2008). Contraindicated drug courts. UCLA Law Review, 55, 783-794.
6.
BoyumD.KleimanM. (2003). Breaking the drug-crime link. The Public Interest, 152, 19-38.
7.
BrookK. (2010). Drug courts and the treatment of addiction: Therapeutic jurisprudence and neoliberal governance (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3428034)
8.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1993). Assessment of the feasibility of drug night courts (NCJ 142415). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
9.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2012). Arrest in the United States, 1980-2009 (NCJ 239423). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
ConwayK.LevyJ.VanyukovM.ChandlerR.RutterJ.SwanG.NealeM. (2010). Measuring addiction propensity and severity: The need for a new instrument. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1, 4-12.
11.
DeMatteoD.MarloweD.FestingerD.ArabiaP. (2009). Outcome trajectories in drug court: Do all participants have drug problems?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 354-368.
12.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2002). Crime in the United States 2002: Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
Florida: Drug court judges get sanction authority. (June30, 2006). Crime Control Digest, 40, 7.
FreesE. (2004). Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GastonS. (2016). Race, neighborhood context, and drug enforcement: A mixed-method analysis of racial disparities in drug arrest (Doctoral dissertation). St. Louis: University of Missouri–St. Louis.
17.
General Accounting Office. (1997). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
GoldsteinP.BellucciP.SpuntB.MillerT. (1991). Frequency of cocaine use and violence: A comparison between men and women (NIDA Research Monograph No. 110). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
GottfredsonD.NajakaS.KearleyB. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
20.
Government Accountability Office. (2005a). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Government Accountability Office. (2005b). Community policing grants: COPS grants were a modest contributor to declines in crime during the1990s. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
GreenJ. (1999). Zero tolerance: A case study of police policies and practices in New York city. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 171-187.
23.
GrossJ. (2010). The effects of net-widening on minority and indigent drug offenders: A critique of drug courts. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 10, 161-177.
24.
HannonL.KnappP. (2003). Reassessing nonlinearity in the urban disadvantage/violent crime relationship: An example of methodological bias from log transformation. Criminology, 41, 1427-1448.
25.
HepburnJ.HarveyA. (2007). The effect of the threat of legal sanction on program retention and completion: Is that why they stay in drug court?Crime & Delinquency, 53, 255-280.
26.
HoffmanM. (2000). The drug court scandal. North Carolina Law Review, 78, 1437-1534.
27.
HoffmanM. (2002). The Denver drug court and its unintended consequences. In NolanJ. (Ed.), Drug courts: In theory and in practice (pp. 67-88). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
28.
HowardD. (2016). Race, neighborhood, and drug court graduation. Justice Quarterly, 33, 159-184.
29.
HuddlestonC.Freeman-WilsonK.BooneD. (2004). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the U.S. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
30.
HutlockT. (2003). Addressing concerns about drug courts: Despite political popularity, this treatment method still garners some criticisms. Behavioral Health Management, 23, 16-20.
31.
InciardiA.PottiegerA. (1994). Crack-cocaine use and street crime. Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 273-292.
32.
InciardiA.PottiegerA. (1998). Drug use and street crime in Miami: An (almost) twenty-year retrospective. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 1839-1870.
LevittS. (2002). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime: Reply. American Economic Review, 92, 1244-1250.
35.
LevittS. (2004). Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: Four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 163-190.
36.
LeymonM. (2010). “Fixed” sentencing: The effects on imprisonment rates over time (Master’s dissertation). Eugene: University of Oregon.
37.
LilleyD. (2013). Drug courts and community crime rates: A nationwide analysis of jurisdiction-level outcomes. Journal of Criminology, 2013, Article 571760. doi:10.1155/2013/571760
38.
LilleyD. (2017). Did drug courts lead to increased arrest and punishment of minor drug offenses?Justice Quarterly, 34, 673-698.
39.
LilleyD.BobaR. (2008). A comparison of outcomes associated with two key law-enforcement grant programs. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 438-465.
40.
LiptonD.JohnsonB. (1998). Smack, crack and score: Two decades of NIDA-Funded drugs and crime research at NDRI 1974-1994. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 1779-1815.
41.
LuncefordJ. K.DavidianM. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 2937-2960.
42.
MarloweD. (2012). Alternative tracks in adult drug courts: Matching your program to the needs of your clients. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
43.
MarloweD.FestingerD.LeeP. (2003). The role of judicial status hearings in drug court. Offender Substance Abuse Report, 3, 33-46.
MillerJ.ShuttJ. (2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 91-106.
46.
MitchellO.WilsonD.EggersA.MackenzieD. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60-71.
47.
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2009). America’s problem-solving courts: The criminal costs of treatment and the case for reform. Washington, DC: Author.
NolanJ. (2003). Redefining criminal courts: Problem-solving and the meaning of justice. American Criminal Law Review, 40, 1541-1565.
51.
Office of Justice Programs. (2001). Drug court activity update: Summary information on all programs and detailed information on adult drug courts. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project.
52.
OrrickE. (2005). Assessing the city-level impact of drug courts on crime rates, 1985-2000 (Master’s dissertation). College Park: University of Maryland.
53.
RempelM.Fox-KralsteinD.CissnerA.CohenR.LabriolaM.FaroleD.. . . MagnaniM. (2003). The New York State adult drug court evaluation: Policies, participants, and impacts. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.
54.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 515-524.
55.
SchiffM.TerryC. (1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County’s dedicated drug treatment court. The Justice System Journal, 19, 291-310.
56.
SenjoS. R.LeipL. A. (2001). Testing and developing theory in drug court: A four-part logit model to predict program completion. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 66-87.
57.
ShahS.DeMatteoD.KeeslerM.DavisJ.HeilbrunJ.FestingerD. (2015). Addiction severity index scores and urine drug screens at baseline as predictors of graduation from drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 1257-1277.
58.
TurnerS.LongshoreD.WenzelS.FainT.MorralA.DeschenesE.. . . TaxmanF. (2001). National evaluation of 14 drug courts. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.
59.
WalshN. (2011). Addicted to courts: How a growing dependence on drug courts impacts people and communities. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.justicepolicy.org/research/2217
60.
WeiE.LoeberR.WhiteH. (2004). Teasing apart the developmental associations between alcohol and marijuana use and violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 166-183.
61.
WilsonD. B.MitchellO.MacKenzieD. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.
62.
WolfE.SowardsK.WolfD. (2003). Predicting retention of drug court participants using event history analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37, 139-162.
63.
WooldridgeJ. (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
64.
WorrallJ. (2008). The effects of local law enforcement block grants on serious crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 325-350.
65.
WorrallJ.HiromotoS.MerrittN.DuD.JacobsonJ.IguchiM. (2009). Crime trends and the effect of mandated drug treatment: Evidence from California’s Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 109-113.
66.
ZafftK. M. (2014). Can drug courts improve public safety? Exploring the impacts of drug court on crime (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
67.
ZhaoJ.ScheiderM.ThurmanQ. (2002). Funding community policing to reduce crime: Have cops grants made a difference?Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 7-32.
