Citizens’ perceptions of the police have been recognized as a long-standing issue of significant importance. Positive perceptions of the police, especially as they relate to legitimacy, are not only critical for fostering healthy police/community relationships but also for enhancing community safety. A large body of research has examined the predicates of legitimacy by studying residents’ general police perceptions as well as their perceptions in specific contexts, primarily traffic stops. Much less is known, however, about the sources of police legitimacy in the context of street stop encounters. Consequently, the current study uses data from the 2011 Police Public Contact Survey to examine the role of procedural justice, along with key sociodemographic characteristics—race and class—in shaping perceptions of legitimacy during non-traffic-related police–citizen street encounters. Findings indicate that officer behavior and levels of respect afforded to citizens during these encounters significantly influence perceptions of legitimacy. Implications and policy recommendations are discussed in detail.
AllenJ.Monk-TurnerE. (2010). Citizen perceptions of the legitimacy of traffic stops. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 589-594.
2.
ArielB.FarrarW. A.SutherlandA. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of quantitative criminology, 31(3), 509-535.
3.
BrunsonR. K. (2007). “Police don’t like black people”: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 71-102.
4.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613-640.
5.
BushwayS.JohnsonB. D.SlocumL. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151-178.
6.
CherneyA.MurphyK. (2013). Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 46, 403-421.
7.
ColeD. (1999). Race, policing, and the future of the criminal law. Human Rights, 26, 2.
8.
EithC.DuroseM. R. (2011). Contacts between police and the public, 2008. (NCJ 234599). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, DC.
9.
EdwardsS. B.HarrisD. (2016). Black lives matter. ABDO.
10.
EngelR. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445-481.
11.
GauJ. M. (2013). Consent searches as a threat to procedural justice and police legitimacy: An analysis of consent requests during traffic stops. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24, 759-777.
12.
GauJ. M.BrunsonR. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255-279.
13.
GauJ. M.CorsaroN.StewartE. A.BrunsonR. K. (2012). Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 333-343.
14.
GelmanA.FaganJ.KissA. (2007). An analysis of the New York City police department’s “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 813-823.
15.
HawdonJ. E.RyanJ.GriffinS. P. (2003). Policing tactics and perceptions of police legitimacy. Police Quarterly, 6, 469-491.
16.
HeckmanJ. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475-492.
17.
HindsL.MurphyK. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 27-42.
18.
Institute for Intergovernmental Research. (2015). After-action assessment of the police response to the August 2014: Demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri (COPS Office Critical Response Initiative). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
19.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.HoughM.MyhillA.QuintonP.TylerT. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051.
KochelT. R.ParksR.MastrofskiS. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30, 895-925.
22.
LundmanR. J.KaufmanR. L. (2003). Driving while black: Effects of race, ethnicity, and gender on citizen self-reports of traffic stops and police actions. Criminology, 41, 195-220.
23.
LurigioA. J.GreenleafR. G.FlexonJ. L. (2009). The effects of race on relationships with the police: A survey of African American and Latino youths in Chicago. Western Criminology Review, 10, 29.
24.
MastrofskiS. D.SnipesJ. B.SupinaA. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 269-305.
25.
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 33-63.
26.
MazerolleL.BennettS.DavisJ.SargeantE.ManningM. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245-274.
27.
McCluskeyJ. D. (2003). Police requests for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. LFB Scholarly Pub.
28.
MurphyK. (2015). Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults’ and youths’ willingness to collaborate with police. Policing and Society, 25, 53-76.
29.
MurphyK.HindsL.FlemingJ. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing & Society, 18, 136-155.
30.
MurphyK.TylerT. R.CurtisA. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?Regulation & Governance, 3, 1-26.
31.
NortonB.HamiltonE. E.BrazielR.LinkseyD.ZeunikJ. (2015). An assessment of the St. Louis County Police Department (Collaborative Reform Initiative). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
32.
PetrocelliM.PiqueroA. R.SmithM. R. (2003). Conflict theory and racial profiling: An empirical analysis of police traffic stop data. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 1-11.
33.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s task force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
34.
ReisigM. D.LloydC. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12, 42-62.
35.
ReisigM. D.TankebeJ.MeskoG. (2014). Compliance with the law in Slovenia: The role of procedural justice and police legitimacy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 20, 259-276.
36.
ReitzelJ. D.RiceS. K.PiqueroA. R. (2004). Lines and shadows: Perceptions of racial profiling and the Hispanic experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 607-616.
37.
SantosR.GregoryR.CorderoL.RichardG. (2016). An assessment of the Salinas Police Department (Collaborative Reform Initiative). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
38.
SchulhoferS. J.TylerT. R.HuqA. Z. (2011). American policing at a crossroads: Unsustainable policies and the procedural justice alternative. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 335-374.
39.
StolzenbergR. M.RellesD. A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62, 494-507.
40.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513-548.
41.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103-135.
42.
TheobaldN. A.Haider-MarkelD. P. (2009). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 409-426.
43.
TylerT. R. (1988). What is procedural justice-criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22, 103-136.
44.
TylerT. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283-357.
45.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance.
46.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84-99.
47.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
TylerT. R.FaganJ.GellerA. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 751-785.
49.
TylerT. R.SchulhoferS.HuqA. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365-402.
50.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ.MentovichA. (2015). The consequences of being an object of suspicion: Potential pitfalls of proactive police contact. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12(4), 602-636.
51.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42, 253-282.
52.
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2016). Investigation of the Baltimore City Police Department. Washington, DC: Author.
54.
WeitzerR.TuchS. A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40(2), 435-456.
55.
WolfeS. E.NixJ.KaminskiR.RojekJ. (2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of quantitative criminology, 32(2), 253-282.
56.
WuY.SunI. Y.TriplettR. A. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?. Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 125-156.
