The Influence of Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Problems on the Effectiveness of Juvenile Drug Courts

Abstract

The effectiveness of juvenile drug courts is mixed, and several factors could account for these findings. The present study examines whether and why youth with co-occurring mental health problems may have worse outcomes in juvenile drug court than youth who only have issues with substance use. In a sample of youth in juvenile drug court, 328 youth with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders were compared with 336 youth with only substance use disorders. Youth with co-occurring mental health problems had significantly worse criminal justice outcomes than youth without mental health problems. These outcomes were explained, in part, by more frequent violations of the drug court requirements, and in particular, violations surrounding treatment noncompliance. Results suggest that juvenile drug courts—as they currently operate—may be unsuccessfully managing youth who present with co-occurring mental health and substance use problems. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Keywords

juvenile drug court co-occurring disorders mental illness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrantes

Hoffman

Anton

(2005). Prevalence of co-occurring disorders among juveniles committed to detention centers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 179-193.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson.

Barnes

J. C.

Miller

J. M.

(2009). Identifying leading characteristics associated with juvenile drug court admission and success. Juvenile Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 350-360.

Bureau of Justice Assistance Drug Court Technical Assistance Project. (2012). Drug court activity update: Composite summary information. Washington, DC: American University.

Butler

Chapman

Forman

Beck

(2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17-31.

Cauffman

Steinberg

(1995). The cognitive and affective influences on adolescent decision-making. Temple Law Review, 68, 1763-1789.

Chandler

Spicer

(2006). Integrated treatment for jail recidivists with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. Community Mental Health Journal, 42, 405-425.

Drake

Essocik

Shaner

Carey

Minkoff

Kola

. . .Rickards

(2001). Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 469-476.

10.

Eno Louden

Skeem

(2013). How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 22-34.

11.

Fazel

Doll

Langstrom

(2008). Mental disorders among adolescents in juvenile detention and correctional facilities: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 25 surveys. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 1010-1019.

12.

Frisman

Mueser

Covell

Lin

Crocker

Drake

Essock

(2009). Use of integrated dual disorder treatment via assertive community treatment versus clinical case management for persons with co-occurring disorders and antisocial personality disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, 822-828.

13.

Goldstein

(1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15, 493-506.

14.

Grella

Hser

Joshi

Rounds-Bryant

(2001). Drug treatment outcome for adolescents with comorbid mental and substance use disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 384-392.

15.

Knoll

Sickmund

(2012). Delinquency cases in juvenile court, 2009. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

16.

Latessa

E. J.

Smith

Sullivan

C. J.

Blair

(2011). Evidence-Based Correctional Program Checklist—Drug Court (CPC-DC) synopsis of findings. University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute (UCCI), Cincinnati, OH: Unpublished report.

17.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Dwyer

J. H.

(1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.

18.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Warsi

Dwyer

J. H.

(1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.

19.

McClelland

Elkington

Teplin

Abram

(2004). Multiple substance use disorders in juvenile detainees. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1215-1224.

20.

Mitchell

Wilson

Eggers

MacKenzie

(2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60-71.

21.

Mumola

Karberg

(2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

22.

Osher

(2006). Integrating mental health and substance abuse services for justice-involved persons with co-occurring disorders. Available from http://gainscenter.samhsa.gov

23.

Petersilia

Turner

(1990). Comparing regular and intensive supervision for high risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 87-111.

24.

Puzzanchera

(2013). Juvenile arrests, 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

25.

Shaffer

D. K.

(2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, OH.

26.

Steinberg

(2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55-59.

27.

Steinberg

Albert

Cauffman

Banich

Graham

Wollard

(2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1764-1778.

28.

Sullivan

C. J.

Blair

Latessa

Sullivan

C. C.

(2014). Juvenile drug courts and recidivism: Results from a multisite outcome study. Justice Quarterly. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.908937

29.

Teplin

Abram

McClelland

Dulcan

Mericle

(2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133-1143.

30.

U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2003). Juvenile drug courts: Strategies in practice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/197866.pdf

31.

U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Courts Program Office. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/205621.pdf

32.

Vaughn

Freedenthal

Jenson

Howard

(2007). Psychiatric symptoms and substance use among juvenile offenders: A latent profile investigation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1296-1312.

33.

Wexler

Cicchetti

(1992). The outpatient treatment of depression: Implications of outcome research for clinical practice. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 277-286.

34.

Wilson

Mitchell

MacKenzie

(2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.