This study examines prosecutorial decisions to reject gang-related homicide charges. Focusing on a large, “traditional” gang jurisdiction—Los Angeles—the authors investigate the effect of victim, suspect, and incident characteristics on the likelihood of case rejection for 614 homicide suspects. The data were collected by the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office to evaluate Operation Hardcore, a specialized prosecution unit initiated to address the complexities of prosecuting violent gang-related crimes. These data, which captured decisions made in one of the nation’s largest district attorney’s offices, provide a unique glimpse into how a jurisdiction addressed the growing problem of gang violence. Overall, the results of this study shed light on how prosecutors charge gang-related homicides and how multiple victim cases—which potentially attract more public attention—may influence such decisions. Moreover, the findings also have implications for specialized prosecution units, as they were found to reduce the likelihood of case rejection. Policy implications and directions for future research are offered.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty . Law and Society Review, 21, 291-313.
2.
Alderden, M., & Lavery, T.A. ( 2007). Predicating homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating predictors of disparities across different types of homicides in Chicago. Homicide Studies, 11, 115-132.
3.
Anderson, J. ( 2007, February). Gang-related witness intimidation. National Gang Center Bulletin, 1. Available from www.nationalgangcenter.gov/documents/NGCbulletin_207.pdf. February
4.
Baumer, E.P., Messner, S.F., & Felson, R.B. ( 2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17, 281-307.
5.
Beaulie, M., & Messner, S.F. ( 1999). Race, gender, and outcomes in first degree murder cases . Journal of Poverty, 3, 47-68.
6.
Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. ( 2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461-498.
7.
Black, D. ( 1976). The behavior of law. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
Black, D. ( 1989). Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Bright, C.L., Decker, S.H., & Burch, A.M. ( 2007). Gender and justice in the progressive era: An investigation of Saint Louis juvenile court cases, 1909-1912. Justice Quarterly , 24, 657-678.
10.
Capizzi, M., Cook, J.I., & Schumacher, M. (1995). The target model: A new approach to the prosecution of gang cases. The Prosecutor , March/April, 18-21.
11.
Chaiken, M.R., & Chaiken, J.M. ( 1990). Redefining the career criminal: Priority prosecution of high-rate dangerous offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Curry, G.D., Ball, R.A., & Decker, S.H. ( 1996). Estimating the national scope of gang crime from law enforcement data. In R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (2nd ed., pp. 21-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Curry, G.D., Egley, A., Jr., & Howell, J.C. ( 2004). Youth gang homicide trends in the National Youth Gang Survey. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology meeting. Nashville, TN.
14.
Dahmann, J. ( 1982). An evaluation of Operation Hardcore: A prosecutorial response to violent gang criminality (NIJ 19160). McLean, VA: Mitre Corporation.
15.
Decker, S.H. ( 1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243-264.
16.
Decker, S.H., Bynum, T., & Weisel, D. ( 1998). A tale of two cities: Gangs as organized crime groups . Justice Quarterly, 15, 395-425.
17.
Decker, S.H., & Curry, G.D. ( 2002). Gangs, gang homicides, and gang loyalty: Organized crimes or disorganized criminals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 343-352.
18.
Decker, S.H., & Pyrooz, D.C. ( 2010). Gang violence across the world: Context, culture, and country. Small Arms Survey 2010. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1230.
20.
Estrich, S. ( 1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Finn, P., & Healey, K.M. ( 1996). Preventing gang and drug-related witness intimidation . Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
Frohmann, L. ( 1991). Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems , 38, 213-226.
23.
Froot, K.A. ( 1989). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 333-355.
24.
Genelin, M., & Naiman, L. ( 1988). Prosecuting gang homicides. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
25.
Greenwood, P.W. ( 1980). Career criminal prosecution: Potential objectives. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 85-88.
26.
Howell, J.C. ( 1999). Youth gang homicides: A literature review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 208-241.
27.
Hutson, H.R., Anglin, D., & Pratts, M.J. ( 1994). Adolescents or children injured or killed in drive-by shootings in Los Angeles. New England Journal of Medicine , 330, 324-327.
28.
Jackson, A. ( 2004). Prosecuting gangs: What local prosecutors need to know . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Johnson, C., Webster, B., & Connors, E. ( 1995). Prosecuting gangs: A national assessment [Research in Brief]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
31.
Katz, C.M. ( 2001). The establishment of a police gang unit: An examination of organization and environmental factors. Criminology, 39, 37-74.
32.
Katz, C.M., Webb, V.J., & Armstrong, T.A. (2003). Fear of gangs: A test of alternative models. Justice Quarterly, 20, 95-130.
33.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L.L. ( 2001). Have federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 17, 111-144.
34.
Kleck, G. ( 1997). Targeting guns: Firearms and their control. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
35.
Klein, M.W. ( 1995). The American street gang: Its nature, prevalence, and control. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Klein, M.W., & Maxson, C.L. ( 2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
LaFree, G.D. ( 1989). Rape and the criminal justice system: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
Lagos, M. ( 2008, March 6). Slain witness in protection program. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.sfgate.com/cgiin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/06/BAGHVE9IP.DTL&hw=gangs+witnesses+death&sn=009&sc=189
39.
Lane, J., & Meeker, J.W. ( 2005). Theories and fear of gang crime among Whites and Latinos: A replication and extension of prior research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 627-641.
40.
Lee, C. ( 2005). The value of life in death: Multiple regression and event history analyses of homicide clearance in Los Angeles County. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 527-534.
41.
Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office. ( 1994). Operation hardcore (crime) evaluation: Los Angeles, 1976-1980 [Data file] ICPSR09038-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
42.
Maxson, C. ( 1999). Gang homicide: A review and extension of the literature . In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide studies: A sourcebook of social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Maxson, C.L., Curry, G.D., & Howell, J.C. ( 2002). Youth gang homicides in the United States in the 1990s . In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to Gangs: Evaluation and Research (pp. 107-137), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
44.
Maxson, C.L., Gordon, M.A., & Klein, M.W. ( 1985). Differences between gang and nongang homicides. Criminology, 23, 209-222.
45.
Maxson, C.L., & Klein, M.W. ( 1996). Defining gang homicide: An updated look at member and motive approaches. In C. Ronald Huff’s (Ed.), Gangs in America (2nd ed., pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
McCorkle, R.C., & Miethe, T.D. ( 1998). Political and organizational response to gangs: An examination of a moral panic in Nevada. Justice Quarterly, 15, 41-64.
47.
Miethe, T.D., & McCorkle, R.C. (1997). Gang membership and criminal processing: A test of the "master status" concept. Justice Quarterly, 14, 407-427.
48.
Miethe, T.D., & McCorkle, R.C. (2002). Evaluating Nevada’s antigang legislation and gang prosecution units. In W. L. Reed & S. H. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research (pp. 169-185). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
49.
Natapoff, A. ( 2009). Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of American justice. New York: New York University Press.
50.
Papachristos, A.V. ( 2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations of the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology , 115, 74-128.
51.
Riedel, M., & Boulahanis, J.G. (2007). Homicides exceptionally cleared and cleared by arrest: An exploratory study of police/prosecutor outcomes . Homicide Studies, 11, 151-164.
52.
Rogers, W.H. ( 1993). SG17: Regression standard errors in clustered samples . Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19-23.
53.
Sorenson, S.B., Manz, J.G., & Berk, R.A. ( 1998). News media coverage and the epidemiology of homicide . American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1510-1514.
54.
Spears, J.W., & Spohn, C.C. ( 1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14, 501-524.
55.
Spergel, I.A. ( 1995). The youth gang problem: A community approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
57.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-688.
58.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. ( 1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly , 13, 649-679.
59.
Spohn, C.C., & Spears, J.W. ( 1997). A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women and Criminal Justice , 8, 29-59.
60.
Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Davis-Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the "gateway to justice." Social Problems, 48, 206-235.
61.
Stanko, E.A. ( 1981). The impact of victim assessment on prosecutors’ screening decisions: The case of the New York County District Attorney’s Office. Law and Society Review, 16, 225-239.
62.
Steen, S., Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.
63.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
64.
Tark, J., & Kleck, G. ( 2004). Resisting crime: The effects of victim action on the outcome of crime. Criminology, 42, 861-909.
65.
Taylor, C.A., & Sorenson, S.B. (2002). The nature of newspaper coverage of homicide. Injury Prevention, 8, 121-127.
66.
Thompson, C.Y., Young, R.L., & Burns, R. ( 2000). Representing gangs in the news: Media constructions of criminal gangs. Sociological Spectrum, 20, 409-432.
67.
Thrasher, F. ( 1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Van Derbeken, J. ( 2006). Murder charges dropped against 2 alleged gang members . San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.sfgate.com/cgibin/articlecgi?f=/c/a/2006/11/03/BAGODM5N0B8.DTL&hw=terrell+rollins+witness+murdered&sn=004&sc=429
69.
Williams, K.R., & Flewelling, R.L. (1988). The social production of criminal homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates inAmerican cities. American Sociological Review, 53, 421-431.
70.
Worrall, J. ( 2008). Prosecution in America: A historical and comparative account. In J. Worrall & M. E. Nugent-Borakove’s (Eds.)., The changing role of the American prosecutor (pp 3-30). Albany : SUNY Press.
