“Gentefication” in the Barrio: Examining the Relationship Between Gentrification and Homicide in East Los Angeles

Abstract

Research has increasingly moved toward a consensus that violent crime declines as neighborhoods gentrify, yet some studies find the direction of this relationship varies by type of violent crime. This finding becomes even more important when connected with recent research that finds the structural influences of gang and non-gang homicide are disparate. The current study engages with research in each of these areas by examining the relationship of gentrification with levels of total, gang, and non-gang homicide in Los Angeles Police Department’s (LAPD) Hollenbeck Community Policing Area. We find gentrification was not associated with variation in total or gang homicide, but was positively associated with non-gang homicide.

Keywords

gentrification Los Angeles homicide gangs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

(2015). “Gentrify? No! Gentefy? Sí!”: Urban redevelopment and ethnic gentrification in Boyle Heights, Los Angeles. Aspeers, 8, 9-26.

Aliprantis

Hartley

(2015). Blowing it up and knocking it down: The local and city-wide effects of demolishing high concentration public housing on crime. Journal of Urban Economics, 88, 67-81.

Allison

Paul D.

2005. Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

Anderson

(1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Anselin

(2002). Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27, 247-267.

Armstrong

T. A.

Katz

C. M.

Schnebly

(2015). The relationship between citizen perceptions of collective efficacy and neighborhood violent crime. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 121-142.

Auge

(2017, November 29). Gentrification and the arrival of art galleries in Boyle Heights: Is There a correlation? Urbanize LA. Retrieved from https://urbanize.la/post/gentrification-and-arrival-art-galleries-boyle-heights-there-correlation

Balzarini

J. E.

Shlay

A. B.

(2016). Gentrification and the right to the city: Community conflict and casinos. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38, 503-517.

Barton

M. S.

(2016a). An exploration of the importance of the strategy used to identify gentrification. Urban Studies, 53, 92-111.

10.

Barton

M. S.

(2016b). Gentrification and violent crime in New York City. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 1180-1202.

11.

Barton

M. S.

Gruner

(2016). A theoretical explanation of the influence of gentrification on neighborhood crime. Deviant Behavior, 37, 130-146.

12.

Betancourt

(2019, January). Boyle heights-set bilingual comedy series “gentrified” comes to Netflix. Remezcla. Retrieved from https://remezcla.com/film/netflix-gentefied-latino-series/

13.

Blasko

B. L.

Roman

C. G.

Taylor

R. B.

(2015). Local gangs and residents’ perceptions of unsupervised teen groups: Implications for the incivilities thesis and neighborhood effects. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 20-28.

14.

Boggess

L. N.

Hipp

J. R.

(2016). The spatial dimensions of gentrification and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Justice Quarterly, 33, 584-613.

15.

Brantingham

P. J.

Tita

G. E.

Short

M. B.

Reid

S. E.

(2012). The ecology of gang territorial boundaries. Criminology, 50, 851-885.

16.

Brown-Saracino

(2017). Explicating divided approaches to gentrification and growing income inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 515-539.

17.

Cahill

Hayeslip

(2010). Findings from the evaluation of OJJDP’s Gang Reduction Program. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

18.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

19.

Costanza

S. E.

Helms

(2012). Street gangs and aggregate homicides: An analysis of effects during the 1990s violent crime peak. Homicide Studies, 16, 280-307.

20.

Covington

Taylor

R. B.

(1989). Gentrification and crime: Robbery and larceny changes in appreciating Baltimore neighborhoods during the 1970s. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25, 142-172.

21.

Curry

G. D.

(2015). The logic of defining gangs revisited. In Decker

S. H.

Pyrooz

D. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of gangs (pp. 7-27). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

22.

Curry

G. D.

Spergel

I. A.

(1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381-405.

23.

Esbensen

F. A.

Winfree

L. T.

Jr. He

Taylor

T. J.

(2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime & Delinquency, 47, 105-130.

24.

Freeman

(2006). There goes the ‘hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

25.

Fremon

(2008). G-dog and the homeboys: Father Greg Boyle and the gangs of East Los Angeles. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

26.

Hagedorn

J. M.

Rauch

(2007). Housing, gangs, and homicide: What we can learn from Chicago. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 435-456.

27.

Hipp

J. R.

Wickes

(2016). Violence in urban neighborhoods: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and violent crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 783-808.

28.

Kirk

David S.

Laub

John H.

(2010). Neighborhood change and crime in the modern metropolis. Crime and Justice, 39, 441-502.

29.

Klein

M. W.

(1995). Street gang cycles. In Wilson

J. Q.

Petersilia

(Eds.), Crime (pp. 217-236). San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

30.

Klein

M. W.

Maxson

C. L.

(2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

31.

Kreager

D. A.

Lyons

C. J.

Hays

Z. R.

(2011). Urban Revitalization and Seattle Crime, 1982–2000. Social Problems, 58, 615-639.

32.

Kubrin

C. E.

(2003). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Does type of homicide matter? Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 139-170.

33.

Kubrin

C. E.

Wadsworth

(2003). Identifying the structural correlates of African American killings: What can we learn from data disaggregation? Homicide Studies, 7, 3-35.

34.

Leavitt

Ochs

(1998). Failing, but not fooling, public housing residents: The impact of job interventions (The Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies Working Paper Series). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

35.

Lee

Y. Y.

(2010). Gentrification and crime: Identification using the 1994 Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 549-577.

36.

Los Angeles Police Department. (2018). Hollenbeck community policing station. Retrieved from http://www.lapdonline.org/hollenbeck_community_police_station

37.

Loukaitou-Sideris

Gonzalez

Ong

(2017). Triangulating neighborhood knowledge to understand neighborhood change: Methods to study gentrification. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39, 227-242. doi:10.1177/0739456X17730890

38.

Mares

(2010). Social disorganization and gang homicides in Chicago: A neighborhood level comparison of disaggregated homicides. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 38-57.

39.

Maxson

C. L.

Gordon

M. A.

Klein

M. W.

(1985). Differences between gang and nongang homicides. Criminology, 23, 209-222.

40.

Maxson

C. L.

Hennigan

K. M.

Sloane Ranney

(1999). Perceptions of crime and policing in Los Angeles neighborhoods: Descriptive results from a survey of four LAPD areas. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

41.

Maxson

C. L.

Klein

M. W.

(1990). Street gang violence: Twice as great, or half as great? In Huff

C. R.

(Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 71-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

42.

Maxson

C. L.

Klein

M. W.

(1996). Defining gang homicide: An updated look at member and motive approaches. In Huff

C. R.

(Ed.), Gangs in America (2nd ed.), (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

43.

Maxson

C. L.

Klein

M. W.

(2002). “Play groups” no longer: Urban street gangs in the Los Angeles region. In Dear

M. J.

(Ed.), From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory (pp. 239-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

44.

McDonald

S. C.

(1986). Does gentrification affect crime rates? In Reiss

A. J. J.

Tonry

(Eds.), Communities and Crime (Vol. 8, pp. 163-203). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

45.

Medina

(2013, August 17). Los Angeles neighborhood tries to change, but avoid the pitfalls. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/us/los-angeles-neighborhood-tries-to-change-but-avoid-the-pitfalls.html

46.

Mejia

(2016, November 3). LAPD investigating Boyle Heights vandalism as possible hate crimes sparked by gentrification fight. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-boyle-heights-20161102-story.html

47.

Minnesota Population Center. (2011). National historical geographic information system: Version 2.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

48.

Moore

J. W.

(1991). Going down to the barrio: Homeboys and homegirls in change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

49.

Moore

J. W.

Vigil

J. D.

Garcia

(1983). Residence and territoriality in Chicano gangs. Social Problems, 31, 182-194.

50.

Morenoff

J. D.

Sampson

R. J.

Raudenbush

S. W.

(2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517-558.

51.

Ohland

(2004, November 18). Renaissance in the Barrio. LA Weekly. Retrieved from https://www.laweekly.com/news/renaissance-in-the-barrio-2139102

52.

Papachristos

A. V.

(2005). Interpreting inkblots: Deciphering and doing something about modern street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 643-652.

53.

Papachristos

A. V.

(2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 74-128.

54.

Papachristos

A. V.

(2013). 48 years of crime in Chicago: A descriptive analysis of serious crime trends from 1965 to 2013. Yale, CT: Institution for Social and Policy Studies.

55.

Papachristos

A. V.

Smith

C. M.

Scherer

M. L.

Fugiero

M. A.

(2011). More coffee, less crime: The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City & Community, 10, 215-240.

56.

Parks

C. H.

(2005). 2004–2005 Los Angeles county civil grand jury final report. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury.

57.

Pyrooz

D. C.

(2012). Structural covariates of gang homicide in large US cities. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 49, 489-518.

58.

Radil

S. M.

Flint

Tita

G. E.

(2010). Spatializing social networks: Using social network analysis to investigate geographies of gang rivalry, territoriality, and violence in Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 307-326.

59.

Reyes-Velarde

(2018, September 1). A TV show chronicling gentrification in Boyle Heights is protested as an example of, well gentrification. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-boyle-heights-tv-show-protests-20180901-story.html

60.

Sampson

R. J.

(2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

61.

Smith

C. M.

(2014). The influence of gentrification on gang homicides in Chicago neighborhoods, 1994 to 2005. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 569-591.

62.

Smith

L. M.

Bertozzi

A. L.

Brantingham

P. J.

Tita

G. E.

Valasik

(2012). Adaptation of an ecological territorial model to street gang spatial patterns in Los Angeles. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 32, 3223-3244.

63.

Smith

(1998). Gentrification. In Vliet

W. V.

(Ed.), The encyclopedia of housing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

64.

Taylor

R. B.

Covington

(1988). Neighborhood changes in ecology and violence. Criminology, 26, 553-589.

65.

Tita

G. E.

Cohen

Engberg

(2005). An ecological study of the location of gang “set space.” Social Problems, 52, 272-299.

66.

Tita

G. E.

Greenbaum

R. T.

(2009). Crime, neighborhoods and units of analysis: Putting space in its place. In Weisburd

Bernasco

Bruinsma

G. J. N.

(Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research (pp. 145-170). New York, NY: Springer.

67.

Tita

G. E.

Griffiths

(2005). Traveling to violence: The case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 42, 275-308.

68.

Tita

G. E.

Radil

S. M.

(2011). Spatializing the social networks of gangs to explore patterns of violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 521-545.

69.

Tita

G. E.

Riley

K. J.

Ridgeway

Grammich

C. A.

Abrahamse

Greenwood

P. W.

(2003). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.

70.

Valasik

(2014). “ Saving the world, one neighborhood at a time”: The role of civil gang injunctions at influencing gang behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine.

71.

Valasik

Barton

M. S.

Reid

S. E.

Tita

G. E.

(2017). Barriocide: Investigating the temporal and spatial influence of neighborhood structural characteristics on gang and non-gang homicides in East Los Angeles. Homicide Studies, 21, 287-311.

72.

Valasik

Tita

(2018). Gangs and space. In Johnson

S. D.

Bruinsma

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 843-871). Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press.

73.

van Gennip

Hunter

Ahn

Elliot

Luh

Halvorson

Brantingham

P. J.

(2013). Community detection using spectral clustering of sparse geosocial data. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 73, 67-83.

74.

Vigil

J. D.

(2007). The projects: Gang and non-gang families in East Los Angeles. Austin: University of Texas Press.

75.

Vives

(2017, July 18). A community in flux: Will Boyle Heights be ruined by one coffee shop? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-boyle-heights-gentrification-coffee-20170621-story.html

76.

Williams

K. R.

Flewelling

R. L.

(1988). The social production of criminal homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates in American cities. American Sociological Review, 53, 421-431.