Since the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, Federal, State and local governments have increasingly moved toward establishing Homeland Security as an institutional response to not only the threat of future terrorist attacks, but as a means of preparing and responding to natural disasters. Every plan at every level has stated that a critical element to any Homeland Security program is the local police and sheriff's departments. What specifically the police are to do under the concepts of Homeland Security has been unclear and poorly communicated and departments across the country have responded very differently from one another. To date, research in the area of Policing and Homeland Security has been lacking. This article addresses that deficiency, introduces the collection of research articles contained within this special issue of Criminal Justice Policy Review, and establishes an agenda for future research.
Arlington County. (2002). Arlington county after-action report. Arlington County, VA: Author.
2.
Brokaw, T. (1998). The greatest generation. New York: Random House.
3.
Carter, D. (2004). Law enforcement intelligence: A guide for state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. Washington, DC: DOJ.
4.
Davis, L.M., Mariano, L.T., Pace, J.E., Cotton, S.K., & Steinberg, P. (2006). Combating terrorism: How prepared are state and local response organizations?Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
5.
Davis, L.M., Riley, K.J., Ridgway, G., Pace, J., Cotton, S.K., & Steinberg, P.S. (2004). When terrorism hits home: How prepared are state and local law enforcement?Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6.
De Guzman, M.C. (2002, Sept/Oct). The changing roles and strategies of the police in time of terror. ACJS Today, 8-13.
Department of Homeland Security. (2008). National incident management framework. Washington, DC : DHS.
9.
Docobo, J. (2005). Community policing as the primary prevention strategy for homeland security at the local law enforcement level. Homeland Security Affairs, 1, 1-12.
10.
Doherty, S. & Hibbard, B.G. (2006). Community policing and homeland security. Police Chief, 73, 47-50.
11.
Eck, J.E. & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem-solving: Problem oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: PERF .
12.
Executive Office of the President. (2003a). Homeland security presidential directive 5. Washington, DC: White House.
13.
Executive Office of the President. (2003b). Homeland security presidential directive 8. Washington, DC: White House.
14.
Friedmann, R.R. & Cannon, W.J. (2007). Homeland security and community policing: Competing or complementing public safety policing. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4, 1-27.
15.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach . Crime & Delinquency, 25, 236-258.
16.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw Hill.
17.
Greene, J., & Mastrofski, S. (1988). Community policing: Rhetoric or reality?New York: Praeger.
18.
Henry, V.E. (2002). The need for a coordinated and strategic local police approach to terrorism: A practitioner's perspective. Police Practice and Research, 3, 319-336.
19.
Henry, V.E. (2003). The CompStat paradigm: Management and accountability in policing business, and the public sector. Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law Publications.
20.
International Association of Chiefs of Police ( 2005). From hometown security to homeland security: IACP's principles for a locally designed and nationally coordinated homeland security strategy . Alexandria, VA: IACP.
21.
International City/County Management Association. (2003). Homeland security: Best practices for local government . Washington, DC: ICMA.
22.
Jackson, A.L., & Brown, M. (2007). Ensuring efficiency, interagency cooperation, and protection of civil liberties: Shifting from a traditional model of policing to an intelligence-led (ILP) paradigm. Criminal Justice Studies , 20, 111-129.
23.
Murray, J. (2005). Policing terrorism: A threat to community policing or just a shift in priorities? Police Practice & Research , 6, 347-361.
24.
/11 Commission. (2004). Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
25.
Office for Domestic Preparedness. (2003). Preparedness guidelines for homeland security: Deterrence, and prevention . Washington, DC: DHS.
26.
Office of Homeland Security. (2002). National Strategy for Homeland Security. Washington, DC : U.S. GPO.
27.
Oliver, W.M. (2004). The homeland security juggernaut: The end of the community policing era? Crime & Justice International , 20, 4-10.
28.
Oliver, W.M. (2005). The era of homeland security: September 11, 2001 to. Crime & Justice International, 21, 9-17.
29.
Oliver, W.M. (2006). The fourth era of policing: Homeland Security. International Review of Law, Computers, and Technology, 20, 49-62.
30.
Oliver, W.M. (2007). Homeland security for policing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Ortiz, C.W., Hendricks, N.J., & Sugie, N.F. (2007). Policing terrorism: The response of local police agencies to homeland security concerns. Criminal Justice Studies , 20, 91-109.
32.
Pelfrey, W.V. (2005a). The cycle of preparedness: Establishing a framework to prepare for terrorist threats. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2, 1-21.
33.
Pelfrey, W.V. (2005b). Parallels between community oriented policing and the war on terrorism: Lessons learned. Criminal Justice Studies, 18, 335-346.
34.
Pelfrey, W.V. (2007). Local law enforcement terrorism prevention efforts: A state level case study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 313-321.
35.
Peterson, M. (2005). Intelligence-led policing: The new intelligence architecture. Washington, DC: BJA .
36.
Ramirez, D.A., Hoopes, J., & Quinlan, T.L. (2003). Defining racial profiling in a post September 11 world. American Criminal Law Review, 40, 1195-1239.
