This study evaluates the intended and unintended consequences of the Missouri Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 1995. Factors related to sentence outcomes are examined prior to the Act's passage and then several years after the Act was implemented. The elimination of sex and race biases were intended goals of the Act. Although the analyses reveal mixed findings, the results clearly indicate that sex and race equity was not achieved. Some evidence suggests that judges may be taking a more retributive approach since the passage of the Reform Act, for example, not placing as much emphasis on drug/alcohol use when making sentencing decisions. Alternative explanations are offered.
Abrams, D.E. (2003). A very special place in life: The history of juvenile justice in Missouri. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Juvenile Justice Association.
2.
Abrams, D.E. (2005). Reforming juvenile delinquency treatment to enhance rehabilitation, personal accountability, and public safety. Oregon Law Review, 84, 1001-1092.
3.
Aldrich, J.H., & Nelson, F.D. (1984). Linear probability, logit and probit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Bernard, T.J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Dedel, K. (1998). National profile of the organization of state juvenile corrections systems. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 507-525.
6.
Fagan, J. (1996). The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law and Policy, 18, 77-114.
7.
Frazier, C.E., Bishop, D.M., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1999). Get-tough juvenile justice reforms: The Florida experience. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 564, 167-184.
8.
Gebo, E. (2005). Do family courts administer individualized justice in delinquency cases? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(2), 190-210.
9.
Griffin, P., Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions: Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Jenson, J.M., & Howard, M.O. (1998). Youth crime, public policy, and practice in the juvenile justice system: Recent trends and needed reforms. Social Work, 43(4), 324-334.
12.
Lipsey, M.W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartman , L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-128). New York: Russell Sage.
13.
Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Mears, D.P. (1998). Evaluation issues confronting juvenile justice sentencing reforms: A case study of Texas. Crime and Delinquency , 44(3), 443-463.
15.
Mears, D.P. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of juvenile justice reforms: A closer look at the criteria and the impacts on diverse stakeholders . Law and Policy, 22(2), 175-202.
Myers, D.L. (2003). Adult crime, adult time: Punishing violent youth in the adult criminal justice system. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1(2), 173-197.
18.
Neter, J., Kutner, N.J., Nachtsheim, C.V., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Boston: Irwin .
19.
Singer, S.I. (1996a). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Singer, S.I. (1996b). Merging and emerging systems of juvenile and criminal justice. Law and Policy, 18, 1-15.
21.
Snyder, H.N. (2003). OJJDP bulletin: Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
23.
Torbet, P.M., Gable, R., Hurst, H., Montgomery, I., Szymanski, L., & Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime: Research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
Unnever, J., & Hembroff, L. (1988). The prediction of racial/ethnic disparities: An expectation states approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25(1), 53-82.
