The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of victim's clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance on attributions concerning an incident of acquaintance rape. Subjects were male and female university students who read a scenario depicting acquaintance rape, viewed a photograph of one of three female models in a short, moderate, or long skirt, answered ten questions concerning their perceptions of the incident, and completed a Rape Myth Acceptance scale. Main effects were found for sex of subject, for rape myth acceptance, and for victims's clothing. There were 2-way interactions between rape myth acceptance and victim's clothing for four questions. Results of this study document existence of a belief in, and potential effects of, rape myths. Since belief in rape myths is likely to interact with clothing cues to affect perceptions of a victim, it is important that a rape victim's clothing not be allowed as evidence in a trial.
Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Hamish, R. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently ? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 108-126.
2.
Balos, B., & Fellows, M. (1991). Guilty of the crime of trust: Nonstranger rape . Minnesota Law Review, 75, . 599-618.
3.
Blumberg, M., & Lester, D. (1991). High school and college students' attitudes toward rape. Adolescence, 26(103), 727-729.
4.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.
5.
Cahoon, D., & Edmonds, E. (1989). Male-female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females' clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(3), 280-281.
6.
Edmonds, E. & Cahoon, D. (1986). Attitudes concerning crimes related to clothing worn by female victims. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 24(6), 444-446.
7.
Feild, H. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), 156-179.
8.
Fromm, B. (1991). Sexual battery: Mixed-signal legislation reveals need for further reform. Florida State University Law Review , 18, 579-605.
9.
Gibbs, N. (1991, June 3). When is it rape? Time , 48-55.
10.
Kanin, E. (1984). Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims. Victimology: An International Journal, 9, 95-97.
11.
Koss, M., Dinero, T., Seibel, C., & Cox, S. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly , 12, 1-24.
12.
Lennon, T., Lennon, S., & Johnson, K. (1993). Is clothing probative of attitude or intent? Implications for rape and sexual harassment cases. Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 11(2), 391-415.
13.
Mazelan, P. (1982). Stereotypes and perceptions of the victims of rape. Victimology: An International Journal, 5, 121-132.
14.
Monson, T. (1983). Implications of the traits vs. situations controversy for differences in the attributions of actors and observers. In F. Finchon and M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental social dimensions (pp. 293-313). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Muehlenhard, C., & MacNaughton, J. (1988). Women's beliefs about women who "lead men on". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 7(1), 65-79.
16.
Muehlenhard, C., & Linton, M. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 34(2), 186-196.
17.
New year will usher in new gun control law. (1991, December 27). Southern Illinoisan, p. 4A.
18.
Norment, L. (1991, September). What's behind the dramatic rise in rapes? Ebony, 92-98.
19.
Rape ruling: `She asked for it'. (1989, October 6). Southern Illinoisan, p. 1.
20.
Rus, M. ( 1995, February). The rape campaign: Can sexy images be used to sell an antirape message? Elle, 54.
21.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31(5), 530-543.
22.
Shaver, K. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
23.
Terry, R. (1981). Contextual similarities in subjective probabilities of rape and other events. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 293-294.
24.
Terry, R., & Doerge, S. (1979). Dress, posture, and setting as additive factors in subjective probabilities of rape. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 903-906.
25.
Vali, D., & Rizzo, N. (1991). Apparel as one factor in sex crimes against young females: Professional opinions of U.S. psychiatrists. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35(2), 167-181.
26.
Williams, N. (1989, October 10). Date rape devastates victim by violating sense of trust. Daily Egyptian, p. 6.
27.
Wood, S. (1991, August 4). Violence, not passion. St. Louis Post-Dispatch Magazine, 28.
28.
Zellman, G., & Goodchilds, J. (1983). Becoming sexual in adolescence . In E. A. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior (pp. 49-63). Palo Alto, CA : Mayfield.
