The objective of this study was to explore aesthetic aspects of clothing design. Evaluations of the attractiveness of men's tailored clothing by men and women were analyzed, focusing on the influence of aesthetic attributes and consumer characteristics. An individual-subject analysis of variance, based on a conjoint model with interactions, showed evaluations were affected by aesthetic attributes, configurations of aesthetic attributes, and consumer characteristics. Theoretical and managerial implications of the results for retailers and fashion marketers are discussed.
Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory . New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bell, C. (1989). Art as significant form: From Art. In G. Dickie, R. Sclafani, & R. Roblin (Eds.), Aesthetics: A critical anthology, (pp. 73-83). New York: St. Martin's Press.
3.
Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Meredith.
4.
Bettman, J.R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
Clancy, K.J., & Shulman, R.S. (1992). It's better to fly new product simulator than crash the real thing. Planning Review, 20, 10-17.
DeLong, M.R. (1968). Analysis of costume visual form. Journal of Home Economics, 60, 784-788.
8.
DeLong, M.R. (1987). The way we look. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
9.
Eckman, M., Damhorst, M.L., & Kadolph, S.J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Textiles andClothing Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22.
Evans, M. (1990). Fashion: The design-marketing mismatch ? Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 14, 257-267.
12.
Fairhurst, A.E., Good, L.K., & Gentry, J.W. (1989). Fashion involvement: An instrument validation procedure. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 10-14.
13.
Gockel, G. (1969). Income and religious affiliation: A regression analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 74(May), 632-649.
14.
Goldstein, S. (1969). Socioeconomic differentials among religious groups in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 74, 612-631.
15.
Green, P.E., & Wind, Y. (1975). New way to measure consumers' judgments. Harvard Business Review, 107-117.
16.
Hahn, G., & Shapiro, S. (1966). A catalog and computer program for the design and analysis of orthogonal asymmetric fractional factorial designs (Research Rep. No. 66-C-165). Schenectady, NY: General Electric.
17.
Hays, W.L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston .
18.
Holbrook, M.B. (1981). The esthetic imperative in consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman & M. B. Holbrook (Eds.) Symbolic Consumer Behavior (pp. 36-37). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research .
19.
Holbrook, M.B. (1986). Aims, concepts, and methods for the differences in esthetic responses to design features. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 337-347.
20.
Holbrook, M., & Dixon, G. (1985). Mapping the market for fashion: Complementarity in consumer preferences. In M. R. Solomon (Ed.), The Psychology of Fashion (pp. 109-126). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
21.
Holbrook, M.B., & Hirschman, E.C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.
22.
Holbrook, M.B., & Schindler, R.M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 119-124.
23.
Howard, J.A., & Sheth, J.N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Lubner-Rupert, J., & Winakor, G. (1985). Male and female style preference and perceived fashion risk. Home Economics Research Journal, 13, 256-266.
25.
Minshall, B., Winakor, G., & Swinney, J.L. (1982). Fashion preferences of males and females, risks perceived, and temporal quality of styles. Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 369-379.
26.
Morganosky, M.A., & Postlewait, D.S. (1989). Consumers' evaluations of apparel form, expression, and aesthetic quality. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7, 11-15.
Sproles, G.B. (1981). The role of aesthetics in fashion-oriented consumer behavior. In Perspectives of Fashion (pp. 120-127). Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
29.
Sproles, G.B., & Bums, L.D. (1994). Changing appearances: Understanding dress in contemporary society. New York: Fairchild.
30.
Veblen, T. (1912). Theory of the leisure class. New York: MacMillan.
31.
Vicary, G.Q. (1988). The signs of clothing. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 291-314). Lewiston, NY: C. J. Hogrefe.
32.
Wagner, J., Anderson, C., & Ettenson, R. (1990). Evaluating attractiveness of apparel design: A comparison of Chinese and American consumers. In P. E. Horridge (Ed.), ACPTC Proceedings National Meeting (p. 97). Monument, CO: Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing.
33.
Whisney, A.J., Winakor, G., & Wolins, L. (1979). Fashion preference: Drawings versus photographs . Home Economics Research Journal, 8(November), 138-150.
34.
Winakor, G., & Goings, B.D. (1973). Fashion preference: Measurement of change. Home Economics Research Journal, 1, 195-209.
35.
Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
