This study investigated the levels of avatar realism required for users to perceive a virtual body as their own and identified optimal avatar design conditions for positive user experiences without psychological discomfort. Fifteen female participants engaged in an experiment involving 30 distinct avatar conditions, combining two facial feature variations, five levels of body representation, and three outfit types, while using a VR headset. Participants evaluated their engagement with avatars by considering facial features, senses of body ownership and body presence, and the reliability of virtual fitting. The study also explored how avatar realism influences likability and overall user experiences. Findings revealed that modest simplification of avatar body representations could elicit positive user responses and suggested key technical specifications driving these effects. The insights gained from this study provide a foundation for optimizing virtual avatar design and fitting systems, enabling more immersive and user-centered experiences in digital fashion platforms.
BalachM.CichockaA.FrydrychI.KinsellaM. (2020). Initial investigation into real 3D body scanning versus avatars for the virtual fitting of garments. Autex Research Journal, 20(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/aut-2019-0037
2.
BatoolR.MouJ. (2024). A systematic literature review and analysis of try-on technology: Virtual fitting rooms. Data and Information Management, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2023.100060
3.
BaytarF.ChungT.ShinE. (2020). Evaluating garments in augmented reality when shopping online. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2018-0077
4.
BeckM.CriéD. (2018). I virtually try it … I want it! virtual fitting room: A tool to increase on-line and off-line exploratory behavior, patronage and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.006
5.
BonettiF.PerryP. (2017). A review of consumer-facing digital technologies across different types of fashion store formats. In I. Choi (Ed.), Advanced fashion technology and operations management (pp. 137–163). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1865-5.ch006
BurleighT. J.SchoenherrJ. R.LacroixG. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.021
DRESSX. (2023). What is DRESSX? The world's first digital fashion store. DRESSX. https://www.dressx.com
10.
Gonzalez-FrancoM.PeckT. C. (2018). Avatar embodiment. Towards a standardized questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00074
11.
HepperleD.PurpsC. F.DeuchlerJ.WölfelM. (2022). Aspects of visual avatar appearance: Self-representation, display type, and uncanny valley. The Visual Computer, 38(4), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02151-0
12.
HerzM.RauschnabelP. A. (2019). Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008
International Organization for Standardization. (2017). Size designation of clothes-part2 (ISO Standard No. 8559-2:2017). https://www.iso.org/standard/64075.html
16.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). 3-D scanning methodologies for internationally compatible anthropometric databases (ISO Standard No. 20685:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/63260.html
17.
KilteniK.GrotenR.SlaterM. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
LeeY. R.JangJ. A. (2020). A comparative of the different between virtual fashion 3D avatar and size Korea of adult women's body shapes. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 22(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2020.22.1.87
21.
LeeD. H.KwonJ. H.SeoY. N.YouB. J. (2015). The effect of human avatars’ facial similarity on users’ sense of co-presence. In 3rd international conference on human-agent interaction (pp. 247–248). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/2814940.2814987
MoriM.MacDormanK. F.KagekiN. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics& Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
24.
PanX.HamiltonA. F. d. C. (2018). Impact of personalized avatars and motion synchrony on embodiment and users’ subjective experience: Empirical study. JMIR Serious Games, 6(2), e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.8848
25.
ParkJ.OgleJ. P. (2021). How virtual avatar experience interplays with self-concepts: The use of anthropometric 3D body models in the visual stimulation process. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-021-00257-6
26.
PengY.CowanK.Lo RibeiroJ. (2025). Into the virtual worlds: Conceptualizing the consumer-avatar journey in virtual environments. Psychology & Marketing, 42(2), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22129
27.
SeymourM.RiemerK.KayJ. (2018). Actors, avatars and agents: Potentials and implications of natural face technology for the creation of realistic visual presence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 953–981. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00515
28.
SlaterM.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
29.
SteinJ. P.OhlerP. (2017). Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind—the influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition, 160, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.010
30.
WaltemateT.GallD.RothD.BotschM.LatoschikM. E. (2018). The impact of avatar personalization and immersion on virtual body ownership, presence, and emotional response. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794629
