This study explored the decision-making processes, motives, and meaning-making experiences of individuals who enacted a passive donation of objects to the Avenir Museum, a historic fashion and textiles museum on a university campus. The work was informed by theory on the extended self and extended object. We adopted an exploratory, qualitative case study methodology to collect in-depth interviews from 13 donors. The major contribution of this study is a grounded theory model illuminating the Decision-Making Processes and Experiences Donating Objects to a University Historic Fashion and Textiles Museum. Unique to the decision-making model developed for this study are the incorporation of the meaning of the object to the overall decision-making process and the identification of motives specific to the donation of historic fashion objects (e.g., Educational and Relational Motives). The work also highlights the way that participants extended their sense of self and identity through object donations to the Museum.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
5.
BelkR. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
6.
BelkR. W. (1991). Possessions and the sense of past. In BelkR. (Ed.), Highways and buyways: Naturalistic research from the consumer behavior odyssey (pp. 114–130). Association for Consumer Research.
7.
BelkR. (2018). Ownership: The extended self and the extended object. In PeckJ.ShuS. B. (Eds.), Psychological ownership and consumer behavior (pp. 53–68). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8
8.
BurnettJ. J.WoodV. R. (1988). A proposed model of the donation decision process. Research in Consumer Behavior, 3, 1–47.
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
10.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
11.
FosterA. M. (2019). “We decided the museum would be the best place for them”: Veterans, families and mementos of the first world war. History & Memory, 31(1), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.2979/histmemo.31.1.0087
12.
GeertzC. (1983). Local knowledge. Basic.
13.
GreenD. N.Reddy-BestK. L. (2022). Curatorial reflections in North American university fashion collections: Challenging the canon. Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 13(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1386/csfb_00035_2
GuyB. S.PattonW. E. (1989). The marketing of altruistic causes: Understanding why people help. Journal Of Services Marketing, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024711
16.
KonrathS.HandyF. (2017). The development and validation of the motives to donate scale. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976401774894
17.
MarckettiS. B.FitzpatrickJ. E.KeistC. N.KadolphS. J. (2011). University historic clothing museums and collections: Practices and strategies. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 29(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X11419361
18.
MarckettiS. B.GordonJ. F. (2022). The fashion and textiles collection matrix: A proposed self-assessment tool. Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 13(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1386/csfb_00042_1
19.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
20.
OwenJ.BarronA.PottingerL. (2021). Object-oriented interviews. In BarronA.BrowneA. L.EhgartnerU.HallS. M.PottingerL.RitsonJ. (Eds.), Methods for change: Impactful social science methodologies for 21st century problems (pp. 1–9). Aspect and The University of Manchester.
21.
QueenS.BergerV. L. (2006). Clothing and textile collections in the United States: A CSA guide. Texas Tech University Press.
22.
RosenzweigR.ThelenD. (1998). The presence of the past: Popular uses of history in American life. Columbia University Press.
23.
SaldañaJ. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
SchervishP. G.HavensJ. J. (1997). Social participation and charitable giving: A multivariate analysis. Voluntas, 8(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02354199
27.
SimamoraB. (2021). Toward a general theory of consumer motivation: A critical review. Journal of Business Studies and Management Review, 4(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.22437/jbsmr.v4i2.12264
28.
StancielG.Reddy-BestK. L.SimonJ. D.StreckK. G.GreenD.MatthewsD.GordonJ. (2022). Radical structural change in North American dress and textile museums and collections: Critically analyzing social justice, oppression, and empowerment. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 42(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X221132009
29.
StrawnS. M.LittrellM. A.CarlsonL. (2006). Preserving provenance: Collaborative conversation with a textile collector. Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/300
Van der GrijpP. (2014). The sacred gift: Donations from private collectors to museums. Museum Anthropology Review, 8(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.14434/mar.v8i1.3099
XepoleasL.HayflickE. (2022). Curating costumes from many lands: Addressing the colonial gaze in two university dress collections through digital curation. Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 13(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1386/csfb_00036_1
