Avatars as Coping Mechanisms for Body Image Inadequacy: A Snapshot of Generation Z Consumers in the Metaverse

Abstract

This study explores whether creating and identifying with ideal avatars in the metaverse offers Generation Z a way to address self-discrepancies between their real-world and ideal body images, ultimately improving their self-esteem as an avatar while playing metaverse. It also investigates how this boost in self-esteem as an avatar influences users’ tendencies to purchase virtual products and their loyalty to metaverse platforms. An online survey of ZEPETO users was conducted, and data were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results confirm that individuals who feel dissatisfied with their body image can enhance their self-esteem through avatar creation in the metaverse. This improvement is facilitated by the alignment between the user and their ideal avatar. Furthermore, the study finds that users with elevated self-esteem due to their avatars are more likely to purchase virtual goods to sustain this positive selfperception, which in turn strengthens their loyalty to the metaverse platform.

Keywords

metaverse avatar Generation Z body image self-esteem

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ameen

Cheah

J. H.

Kumar

(2022). It’s all part of the customer journey: The impact of augmented reality, chatbots, and social media on the body image and self-esteem of Generation Z female consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 39(11), 2110–2129. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21715

Arkes

H. R.

Blumer

(1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4

Bem

D. J.

(1972). Self-perception theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6

Bessière

Seay

A. F.

Kiesler

(2007). The ideal elf: Identity exploration in World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9994

Cingel

D. P.

Carter

M. C.

Krause

H. V.

(2022). Social media and self-esteem. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101304

Dhandra

T. K.

(2020). Does self-esteem matter? A framework depicting role of self-esteem between dispositional mindfulness and impulsive buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102135

Dick

A. S.

Basu

(1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222001

Dunn

R. A.

Guadagno

R. E.

(2012). My avatar and me–gender and personality predictors of avatar-self discrepancy. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.015

Falk

R. F.

Miller

N. B.

(1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.

10.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

11.

Franzoi

S. L.

Koehler

(1998). Age and gender differences in body attitudes: A comparison of young and elderly adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2190/FVG1-GE5A-8G5Y-DXCT

12.

Gilbert

R. L.

(2011). The P.R.O.S.E. (Psychological Research on Synthetic Environments) Project: A program of in-world behavioral research on the metaverse. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v4i1.2108

13.

Hadi

Melumad

Park

E. S.

(2024). The metaverse: A new digital frontier for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1356

14.

Hair

J. F.

Hult

Ringle

Sarstedt

(2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

15.

Higgins

E. T.

(1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

16.

Holtermann

(2023, January 31). Gen Z’s Distorted Sense of Selfie. International New York Times, NA. https://shorturl.at/mm0Bv

17.

Jin

S. A. A.

(2010). I feel more connected to the physically ideal mini me than the mirror-image mini me: Theoretical implications of the “malleable self” for speculations on the effects of avatar creation on avatar–self connection in wii. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(5), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0243

18.

Kaur

Mogaji

Paliwal

Jha

Agarwal

Mogaji

S. A.

(2024). Consumer behavior in the metaverse. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(4), 1720–1738. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2298

19.

Kim

Lee

S. G.

Kang

(2012). I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users’ identification with virtual communities and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.004

20.

Kim

H. J.

Choi

J. H.

Jung

(2024). Decoding millennials and generation Z consumers’ brand behaviors in the Metaverse: The relationships among avatar identification, self-presence, and psychological dynamics. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2405

21.

D. W.

Park

(2021). I am you, you are me: Game character congruence with the ideal self. Internet Research, 31(2), 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2020-0294

22.

Kock

(2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (Ijec), 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

23.

Lala

Chakraborty

(2015). Impact of consumers’ effort investments on buying decisions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-08-2014-1090

24.

Lancaster

(2021, September 15). 4 new metaverse players: are you in? BANYANHILL. https://banyanhill.com/4-new-metaverse-players/

25.

Langlois

J. H.

Kalakanis

Rubenstein

A. J.

Larson

Hallam

Smoot

(2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

26.

Leone

J. E.

Mullin

E. M.

Maurer-Starks

S. S.

Rovito

M. J.

(2014). The adolescent body image satisfaction scale for males: Exploratory factor analysis and implications for strength and conditioning professionals. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2657–2668. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000439

27.

Liao

G. Y.

Pham

T. T. L.

Cheng

T. C. E.

Teng

C. I.

(2020). Impacts of real-world need satisfaction on online gamer loyalty: Perspective of self-affirmation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.016

28.

Loewen

M. G. H.

Burris

C. T.

Nacke

L. E.

(2021). Me, myself, and not-I: Self-discrepancy type predicts avatar creation style. Front. Psychol, 11, 1902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01902

29.

Malär

Krohmer

Hoyer

W. D.

Nyffenegger

(2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.35

30.

Mandel

Rucker

D. D.

Levav

Galinsky

A. D.

(2017). The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.003

31.

Miklas

Arnold

S. J.

(1999). The extraordinary self’: Gothic culture and the construction of the self. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799785045824

32.

Moffitt

R. L.

Neumann

D. L.

Williamson

S. P.

(2018). Comparing the efficacy of a brief self-esteem and self-compassion intervention for state body dissatisfaction and self-improvement motivation. Body Image, 27, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.008

33.

O’cass

McEwen

(2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.155

34.

Park

Kim

(2024). Examining self-congruence between user and avatar in purchasing behavior from the metaverse to the real world. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 15(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2023.2180768

35.

Park

Kim

H. Y.

(2025). Psychological ownership of avatars in the metaverse: Its key antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(1), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2417

36.

Procter

(2021). I am/we are: Exploring the online self-avatar relationship. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 45(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859920961041

37.

Reisenwitz

T. H.

(2021). Differences in Generation Y and Generation Z: Implication for marketers. Marketing Management Journal, 31(2), 78–92. https://www.mmaglobal.org/_files/ugd/3968ca_6efb18f46da340c49efe67c97c121b71.pdf

38.

Rosenberg

(1979). Conceiving the self. Basic Books.

39.

Sirgy

M. J.

(1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924

40.

Y. S.

Chiang

W. L.

Lee

C. T. J.

Chang

H. C.

(2016). The effect of flow experience on player loyalty in mobile game application. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.049

41.

Swann

W. B.

Jr (1996). Self-traps: The elusive quest for higher self-esteem. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

42.

Takano

Taka

(2022). Fancy avatar identification and behaviors in the virtual world: Preceding avatar customization and succeeding communication. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 6, 100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100176

43.

Teng

C. I.

(2010). Customization, immersion satisfaction, and online gamer loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.029

44.

Torres

P. M.

Augusto

M. G.

Lisboa

J. V.

(2015). Determining the causal relationships that affect consumer-based brand equity: The mediating effect of brand loyalty. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2014-0211

45.

Trepte

Reinecke

(2010). Effects of life-satisfaction, game competitiveness, and identification with the avatar. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(4), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000022

46.

Walters

(2021). Are Generation Z Ethical Consumers? In Stylos

Rahimi

Okumus

Williams

(Eds.), Generation Z marketing and management in tourism and hospitality. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1_12

47.

Yang

H. E.

C. C.

Wang

K. C.

(2009). An empirical analysis of online game service satisfaction and loyalty. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1816–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.005

48.

Yee

Bailenson

(2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x

49.

Yee

Bailenson

J. N.

Ducheneaut

(2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330254

50.

Zhang

Gearhart

(2020). Collecting online survey data: A comparison of data quality among a commercial panel & MTurk. Survey Practice, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2020-0015

51.

Zoting

(2024). Metaverse Market Size, Share, and Trends 2024 to 2033. Precedence Research. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/metaverse-market